jerichor
Stumbled on this show while searching for TV shows to binge watch. Apparently, it got canceled after less than a season. The series had a good plot and had potential. But the main character and his partner do not have chemistry. It would have been better if they slowed down the tempo and make the story unfold, made it darker/grittier and hired more sympathetic actors for the main character and his partner. The writing and cinematography could be better. I'd cast Jim Caviezel and Michael Pena.
jonmccann
Quite why this has been cancelled, I have no idea!The premise is simple, a serial killer on the loose and a two focused plot on both the killer and cop chasing him/her! Sounds simple, but made better. Why? Because it doesn't try and complicate the story with interwoven plots (yes, true detective I mean you!), because it is set in an era when serial killers started to gain notoriety, because it doesn't shy from the gruesome aspects of a serial killer and more importantly, that sets it aside from true detective, it gets into the mind frame of the sociopath quality (yes I wrote quality, as its the one thing that sets us all apart, be that bad or good!) of manipulation and total confidence in the act by the said sociopath.The casting is great, not newbies, but not stellar casting, this makes it convincing from an actor point of view as there is no cheesiness and its believable, the story is really well written, simply because it focuses on the main subject and rarely deviates from the chase, and the setting of the 70's for me at least, means the genre is right at the heart of the time when serial killers started to attain focus on what they did. In all this is a cleverly scripted TV show and could easily have gone on to spurn multiple series, but for some reason it was cancelled, some cite the brutality of it (it's not that gory), but I expect it's because it's so similar to True Detective, but was made on a lesser budget with less well known actors, that was it's downfall. None the less, this is a well made TV show and deserves a second chance, but only if it is in keeping with what it set out to do...Tell a good story, with no over dramatisation, and using the simple basic methods of script writing...Keep it simple, make the plot believable, and keep the viewer hooked! I am hooked!
Christine A
I absolutely LOVED the pilot. I was initially attracted to Wicked City because I am such a huge fan of Ed Westwick, but I have fallen in love with the ensemble cast (esp Taissa Farmiga, Jeremy Sisto), the setting, the music, the wardrobe, the writing, and how the show is filmed. Ed does an amazing job portraying a complex individual who just happens to be a serial killer. His portrayal of Kent is multi-layered and I am so looking forward to how he continues to develop over the course of the show. This show is very very dark, definitely not for the faint of heart, and ABC is pushing the boundaries with this prime time show. I, for one, am enjoying every single minute of it. This show has become my #1 favorite out of all of the fall lineups.
alphatango241
This might be just one of those cases where the pilot is far better than the rest of the series but this first episode is just impressive.The story is really original and every character in the show has the potential to be a bad guy/girl. I was specifically impressed by Erica Christensen who plays a role with more depth than in Parenthood.As per Jeremy Sisto and Ed Westwick, both are giving an excellent show.This story has a real potential and can run for many seasons if the quality of the scenario doesn't deteriorate after the first 10 episodes... as it's often the case (with the producers firing the expensive writers and directors and replace them with amateurs).And the music is good too.