plargreg SPOILER: Zack Bagel or whatever his name is, is nothing more then a fame seeking fraud. Not once in this show does anything supernatural happen, just abunch of burned out potheads make scared faces as they walk into walls and pretend they hear voices (well maybe with all the holes they created in their brains with hard drug use i could believe they do imagine voices) The fact that these guys get paid to do this makes me sick

scallion-42245 What a joke. Worst overacting on TV. I have been to some of the places these guys supposedly investigate. I didn't see or hear anything strange. The bald guy is a clown and seems to be affected by everything BRO! This show is a typical cliché ghost hunter type show that is ruining TV more than it already is with all of these reality shows.

Blake-Brandenburg Let's get this out of they way. For the people basing a television show (that's purely for harmless entertainment by the way) on whether some, most or all of it is fake...PLEASE GET A LIFE. It's entertaining! It's very well done and it pulls you in. For those of us that have been there since the beginning; sure it was sad watching Nick's departure and the way the whole show evolved and changed after it, but it has stayed true to itself in many ways (thank god for Aaron). The emergence of Jay and Billy hasn't been all that bad either. We have all watched Zak's ego grow, but the guy has worked incredibly hard. So what if he goes a little over the top sometimes? It's his livelihood. He's allowed. The pressure that comes from network execs that clearly stick their noses where they don't belong has got to be infuriating. Some of us get it Zak. Just lighten up a little more often big guy. The show has changed big time from the words "with no big camera crews following us around" have been uttered in the opening. But, it's the same guys (for the most part). They give us the nostalgia when they can. You have to remember, there's now two generations of fans here now. They have to cater to both. I think they do an excellent job of it too. As for validity of evidence and/or credibility of those involved...well...they've made their mistakes over the years. Which of course really takes something away from the kid inside of us but, I feel like I know these guys, and that makes them a little more believable for me. Please stop basing reviews off of total non acceptance of the paranormal. It's really pathetic. People believe what they want to believe about the afterlife. If these guys can present "evidence" and be entertaining about it...IT'S A GOOD "SHOW"!

jeremyaraiza I watch almost all paranormal documentaries out there. Sadly, this is one of the worst. They to try to portray themselves as investigators but there is nothing scientific or objective in their approach. They might use technical gadgets but that in no way legitimizes the process.The lead keeps on over reacting, jumping to conclusions, and makes generalizations without any basis whatsoever. He often likes to dramatically proclaim spirits as being evil without any form of evidence. He feels it might be evil so he declares it as evil. Pure sensationalism.If there was any sense of objectivity, then they should approach it with rational observation. Instead, the lead just keeps on over dramatizes and speculates.Furthermore, what is the point of their whole exercise other than sensationalism? They don't try to seriously investigate, nor do they try to help the spirits that may be lingering there. Instead, the lead just likes to show of his machismo by taunting invisible characters. He enjoys trying to show off how fearless he is but over acts like a drama queen the moment some 'ghostly' action takes place.