scanlon178 I'm not so much a fan of reality tv, more like one of those people who slows down in their car to see an accident on the side of the road. I found For Love Or Money quite good, so let's take stock here:It had: 1)Hot women 2)Plot twists, and characters with secrets from one another 3)Some guy who was really quite dumbYou get to laugh at the guy, especially at the end. He had a choice, the girl who actually likes him, Paige, and the other one, the gold-digger, who obviously didn't.And he went with the gold-digger! Ha ha. She played him like a fool. He just couldn't figure it out.From the strangest place ( a crap reality show), comes an important lesson about men; how we behave, and the rules of attraction.

Asteri-Atypical This show is a new low.We're watching the steady descent of the so-called "reality" series. It seems to be the networks' way of shocking the audience. When you think they've gotten as stupid, as trite, as trashy and as pointless as possible, a new series like "For Love or Money" comes out. I would daresay this series has surpassed "Joe Millionaire" for banality. Only "Anna Nicole" rivals it for brain-dead pointlessness.I have to agree with Jay Leno's comment about this series - "I felt like taking a shower after watching that greasy thing"!About "The Anna Nicole Show", I said "TV has finally come out with a show even more pointless as watching a lava lamp". Well, "For Love or Money" wraps up the brain-numbing effects of the lava lamp with the perceived 'joy' of contracting a sexually transmitted disease from a prostitute at the same time.I would say you'd get more entertainment value from watching the TV test pattern at 4am without the same utter decay of every thinking process you have.