Cleopatra

1999
6.4| 0h30m| en| More Info
Released: 23 May 1999 Ended
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Cleopatra, the famed Egyptian Queen born in 69 B.C., is shown to have been brought by Roman ruler Julius Caesar at age 18. Caesar becomes sexually obsessed by the 18 year old queen, beds her, and eventually has a son by her. However, his Roman followers and his wife are not pleased by the union. In fact, as Caesar has only a daughter by his wife, he had picked Octavian as his successor.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Smithsonian Channel

Director

Producted By

Trailers & Images

Reviews

NothingButDVD The first 5 minutes of this movie are incredible. Technically, it's top notch, the sets and costumes are luxuriant, and this is a Must Have for Dalton fans; Caesar never looked (or sounded) so good, striding into Alexandria with so much ego and charisma. Unfortunately, we all know what happens to Caesar, and it happens about halfway through this thing. Then we're left with Cleopatra, the most insufferable lead ever, due in part to terrible acting and the other part to terrible characterization. She does little but whine and pout like a petulant teenager, and is useless for addressing any of a Queen's duties. She can't help this movie any more than her similarly poorly-cast sister Arsinoe, or Billy Zane's unsympathetic Marc Antony. Everyone seems to realize that Caesar is too hard an act to follow, but they do try. The results are mediocre to good in places.However, it's totally worth the watch and the buy for the first hour, which is beautiful, sexy, and violent with an engaging story. And personally I never tire of watching Tim Dalton do what he does best: Upstage everyone and make out with untalented co-stars.
FloatingOpera7 Cleopatra (1999): Leonor Varela, Timothy Dalton, Billy Zane, Rupert Graves, John Bowe, Nadim Sawalha, Art Malik, Owen Teale, Phillip Quast, Daragh O'Malley, Sean Pertwee, Bruce Payne, Kassandra Voyagis, Indra Ove, Josephine Amankwah, Elisabeth Dermot Walsh, James Saxon, Amina Annabi, Alexandar Francis Lynch...Director Franc Roddam Teleplay..Stephen Harrigan, Anton Diether.Based on the best-selling novel "Memoirs of Cleopatra" by Margaret George, this was a televised miniseries on ABC, released in May of 1999. It starred Leonor Varela as Cleopatra, Timothy Dalton as Julius Caesar and Billy Zane as Marc Antony. At the time it aired on TV, many epic made-for-TV films and series was all the rage. NBC had "The Odyssey" with Armand Asante and "Merlin" with Sam Neil. In following with the Cleopatra history/legend, this is a drama dealing with Cleopatra and her relationship with two powerful men in her attempt to empower Egypt as a force equal to that of the growing Roman Empire. While the 1963 Cleopatra with Elizabeth Taylor is far better known and more romanticized, this movie portrays Cleopatra as ambitious and power-hungry, sensual but tough and physically strong. Being the late 90's, she does not come off as a bitchy user of men as much as she does a liberated woman not afraid of confrontation and who uses not only her beauty but her brains. There's a scene late in the film in which Cleopatra, aboard one of Antony's ship in that final decisive sea battle, fights her way out of it. That's something that Elizabeth Taylor's more vulnerable Cleo would not have done on film. Leonor Varela is the first black actress to appear in the role of otherwise "white" Cleopatras and they cast her because she has a tan, Arabic/Mediterrenean look that historians believe is closer to the real Cleopatra. She is a wonderful actress and does the role justice. Timothy Dalton as Caesar is miscast in my opinion, yet another British actor in a role full of pomp. But Billy Zane as Antony is terrific. Shot in North Africa, the look of the film is gorgeous and epic. The screenplay is well-written and certainly a lot better than the 1963 film, but this owes to the fact that the script was drawn from a very well-written novel. This Cleopatra is for modern audiences with modern sensibility and with a feminist slant. Also, Varela's performance as Cleopatra is far more human and moving than Elizabeth Taylor's more wooden one. Varela's human touches of nuance and warmth makes her Cleopatra less cold and calculating than previous Cleopatras. In another scene, she feeds her starving people with wheat that had been stored for Roman occupants. Her Cleopatra is one we can feel sorry for and sympathize with, especially when her dreams of a unified Egypt and Rome alliance are thwarted and one by one her dreams are shattered. Her much talked about suicide is not an act of weakness or despair and in this film, it's made out to be a means of escape for her and a way for her to triumph over Octavian her enemy. Rather than being his new conquest and victimized as another Roman captive, she bravely takes her own life. A great movie with high production values, great sets and costumes and music by Trevor Jones who had done music for NBC's "Merlin" and at one time "Excalibur". So if you liked the novel and you are a fan of historical fiction in film, this one is definitely for you. Watch as the drama, passion and sensationalism unfolds as the triumphs and tragedies of Cleopatra Queen of the Nile comes to life.
ArwenLaitoste Well, this wasn't the worst Cleopatra movie ever, but it sucks compared to the book it's based off of. "The Memiors of Cleopatra," is an incredible novel, and this missed most of it. The novel covers Cleopatra's life from the age of 9 and goes up to her last moment, but there is a lot of emotion and wonderfully historical analysis that was missed in this mini film.Also, I enjoyed the fact Cleopatra was a little less stereotypical, but stereotypical nonetheless. Cleopatra was Greek. Cleopatra was a brilliant and smart woman, who knew 9 different languages. They forgot the fact that she had 3 children with Marcus Antonius. So if you want to watch a movie on the real Cleopatra...you might want to wait until someone directs one.
solbro1-1 This movie was pretty good, but it did get somewhat boring towards the end. I almost fell asleep.The writing was uninspired and in places really bad. But I am so familiar with the two Shakespeare plays based on the same historical events, I may be biased. During Marc Antony's speech to the crowd at Julius Caesar's death I couldn't help but compare it to the mesmerizing speech made in the movie "Julius Caesar" staring Marlon Brando. I also had a problem with the way the movie portrayed Octavian and I don't think the problem was Rupert Graves. It was the script. In a couple scenes they show Octavian to be a coward. Which, considering he became Rome's greatest Emperor, Augustus Caesar, I believe that Octavian was probably a lot of things but coward was definitely not one of them. I almost think they decided to make him cowardly so Marc Antony wouldn't look so whipped.Anyway, this was a nice romance style movie and I liked the pretty colorful sets.