HagenSteele Terrible, terrible, TERRIBLE show! The hosts are portrayed as idiots, if not childish, and they garner absolutely NO respect OR credibility throughout their "investigation". They fail to ask pertinent questions when talking with witnesses, and their is no consistency to be found in their investigative process. The overwhelming majority of "evidence" collection and assessment does very little, if anything, to prove OR disprove any given sighting.This show is less like "In search of..." and more like "Honey boo boo", which is NOT what I want to watch. Chances are, YOU won't want to watch it either.Nat Geo should feel bad for putting this dreck on the air, as it is little more than tabloid television.

grynai I love the National Geographic magazine. In the world where quality matters less and less, it's still surprisingly professional and inspiring.However, seeing shows like this on their TV channel makes me think that one day - sooner rather than later - it too will join the cheap entertainment(?) media. How such an idiotic production ended up on National Geographic channel is beyond me. It seems to go against all the values that I thought the National Geographic society had. But I rarely watch TV and mostly read the magazine, so maybe this show isn't an exception. Maybe it's a direction in which the channel is headed. In that case, I have nothing more to say.

dbusack National Geographic – deep six this show and try to redeem yourselves before you ruin your once respected name! UFO Hunters was bad verging on psychotic.Ancient Aliens took preconceived ideas to entirely new levels so far out of reality that their final episode should have been to visit the wizard and get a brain.The new evolution, Chasing UFO's, is not even worth watching. This show could take a true believer and turn them into a hard core skeptic. There is just no basis in reality/science/research anywhere in this show. I truly cannot come up with any redeeming features for this show. It is as if they gave some failed actors a poorly written script and told them to wing it. I have tried to give it a chance, but three episodes are enough to make my call on this one. This show is pathetic.If this is the direction educational channels (as I once considered National Geographic) are going, we are in for serious problems.

Haydn King Lame. It is just a daytime TV type show for dummies, no real science, no proper investigations, no expert analysis and utterly awful cast. Ryder is the core of this programs failing, she is highly irritating grrrr she must go if the show has any chance, but I am positive it will fail. For the show is a fake as the hubcap ufo photographs that have muddied the real truth all these years. This is a real insult to the professionals that painstakingly research the real evidence on the subject matter, the sheer lack of credible investigations and the Hollywood style faked drama will be a massive disappointment to watchers hoping to find a good solid foundation in this subject. Producers need to rethink this concept and stop making unprofessional cartoon dramas on a subject that has very real and credible evidence to its existence.