monte-hayward This needed to be edited down. I value the gradual unveiling of information in the order it was revealed historically. That is how it unfolded for one affected family. There are way too many minutes of re-enactment, especially the rendering of details that the storytellers say are missing. At times, the re-enactment footage is re-used! Additional footage comes from productions of a Shakespeare tragedy. So it feels as if the Shakespeare OR the re-enactments would have been indulgence enough. Why feature both?I was curious. This answered some questions. Wish it had done so more quickly.

Mr Carrington The title, the trailer añd the marketing blurb lead me to believe that this was a drama in fact I was even misled by IMDb which places it as a drama. Netflix advertises it as a major new drama.unfortunately it is one long boring interview with a decrepit old nobody from nowhere that nobody heard of talking about nothing of its nobody is interested.dull boring unnecessary Avoid

ryanfarnin Goes off in multiple directions at times. Hard to describe without spoiling any of it - just watch for yourself!

abmarchant . . . also obvious, tiresome, repetitious, and low-rent. Long, moody pauses substitute for meaningful dialogue. The interviews are edited to draw attention to words that the filmmaker can then clumsily twist. The cinematography is weighed down by endlessly recycled special effects.