Witchcraft 666: The Devil's Mistress

1994
Witchcraft 666: The Devil's Mistress
3.3| 1h31m| R| en| More Info
Released: 11 May 1994 Released
Producted By: Vista Street Entertainment
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A serial killer targets young women wearing gold crosses; Detectives Lutz and Garner enlist Will Spanner to help with the occult angles of the case.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Vista Street Entertainment

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Michael_Elliott Witchcraft VI: The Devil's Mistress (1994)* 1/2 (out of 4) Detectives Lutz and Garner are investigating the strange murders of three women found in the nude with no apparent death marks. The only thing connecting the victims is that they had gold crosses with them. With no one else to turn to, they ask Will Spanner (Jerry Spicer) to help them with the case and sure enough it leads back to Satan worshipers. WITCHCRAFT VI is yet another bad film from this bad series but like the previous five, this one here just has something about it that makes it watchable. Perhaps it's the non-stop humping that keeps it moving but even this after a while starts to get old. I think it's fairly interesting that we're six movies in and the same character has appeared in each of these. As silly as it might sound, this actually gives the series some familiar territory for the viewer because each time you start a new movie you really don't have to get familiar with new characters and instead you're just continuing the connection with this lawyer who always has a hot girlfriend and is always getting involved with the Devil. The performances here are actually pretty good with Spicer doing a nice job in the role as Will and both Kurt Allen and John Holiday are good as the detectives. As far as the women goes, it's clear that the casting call was for big breasted ladies who wouldn't mind showing their bodies. I think I counted at least six women that were naked before the 25-minute mark and the film hadn't even gotten to the major sex scenes yet! Oh yeah, isn't it kinda strange that pretty much the only scene that doesn't feature nudity is one in a strip joint? This here is clearly just for fans of the series or those nutty enough like myself to try and sit through all of them. Those not fitting either of those categories are best to leave this one alone.
korgaard59 So why 10 out of 10? Mainly to counteract the "Academy". The Academy believes that no film which does not deal directly with some left-wing (gay anything!) societal issue, have a completely depressing ending, or at the very least involve unattractive actors mumbling philosophical nonsense to each other in Swedish or French has any right to be seen. Not so! Klaus Kinski in Herzog's "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" is tedious enough to make me want to peel off my own flesh. Stephanie Swinney in "Witchcraft 6", on the other hand, leads me to believe that some flesh just needs to be appreciated. It should be remembered that in its beginnings cinema never aspired to the status of art. It was entertainment pure and simple. That some film has indeed achieved the status of art is both inarguable and laudable, but it would be unwise to denigrate that which aims to merely titillate or entertain.
Big Wheel This is good harmless fun. Although some typical, uptight,feminist reviewed this and complained about the "gratuitous" female nudity, I enjoyed it and so will most heterosexual men and bisexual women! This was made back in the '80's before the "politically correct" crowd stepped in. Back then you could find lots of fun films with ample female nudity. Nowadays, all we get are dicks flapping in our faces. (yuch!) Female frontal nudity is always a good thing. We need a lot more of THAT in mainstream films, instead of men's penises. Maybe one day things will be fair and Hollywood and the MPAA will allow full female genital nudity (the labia and clitoris) to be shown, the same way they allow full male genital nudity to be shown!Until then, its best to go back to the '80's flicks. Basically this is one of those low budget, campy, fun, not-to-be-taken-seriously horror films that promises good female nudity. I'll take it over disgusting, gay-porn garbage like "Bruno" any day! 8/10
westie-3 Although it pretends to be a horror film, this is really soft core porn at its sleaziest. The good thing is, it's pretty funny at times, and the tongue and cheek style makes an otherwise run of the mill horror pic watchable. Hustler centerfold Stefania Swinney is drop dead gorgeous as the innocent victim at the beginning of the film.