Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough

2005 "Bad girls just want to have fun."
4.5| 1h27m| R| en| More Info
Released: 19 February 2005 Released
Producted By: Mandalay Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Mandalay Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Maziun Hollywood is incredible sometimes. Not only they made "Wild things 2" with basically the same plot as the original , but now they made this. "Wild things 3" is essentially a remake of first two movies ! My God. What a lazy and greedy people live in Hollywood. I'm even more surprised that they made "Wild things 4" ! I haven't seen that one and I'm not going too. From what I've heard the only change they made is that they have now 3 sexy girls in it instead of two.This ? This is a waste of time. Even the sex scenes were awful , because the girls are UGLY.Don't watch it. I give it 1/10.
kosmasp The real diamonds lie within the movie "Wild Things" ... that is/was the first part (they actually went and did a fourth one). The others just retell the same story, with some tweaks here and there (though the second felt, like a complete copy of the formula). And while this might steer a bit away from that, it's still as weak/"good", as the second movie. Though it feels weird calling those movies sequels. They are just cash-ins, made for the quick buck.Stay with the original, to get the story with the acting and the story as it should be told. Of course, if you think you have to watch some nice ladies wearing next to nothing (sometimes only the latter), than you can give this a try. But other than that (acting, story, production values), there is nothing much to see here
bigdgun The plot of this updated Wild Things is weak and the acting isn't much better, but Sarah Laine just might have best body ever seen naked on screen outside of the porn industry. And the extras lying around the pool, diving at the competition, and turning up dead are absolutely gorgeous. Sandra McCoy isn't too bad either. It's a shame that she hired a body double. This one I might have to buy. When the movie ends you might find yourself wondering who and how they all got where they end up, but don't try too hard. You might hurt your pretty head. A physicist couldn't figure it out. So I like to watch two beautiful girls kissing and fondling each other. So I like to watch beautiful girls get even with nasty older guys. So I like beautiful girls. So sue me.
Troy **contains a few spoilers** WT3 has its good points and its bad points. One of the main good points, at least for me, is the character of Dr. Johnson, the handsome, clever forensic geek who plays an instrumental part in the twist of the plot. I'm a forensic buff myself and thought the addition of a forensic scientist was somewhat beneficial to the story. I also liked the return of Linden Ashby, who reprises his WT2 role of Detective Morrison, the cop who's always a step or two behind the deceiving main characters. The only truly bad point was the generic plot line. Money is involved and some of the main characters concoct a scheme to claim it for themselves by staging or committing crimes. But, other than that, the movie's quite watchable.