bakidarakari It is an interesting movie with many twists and turns.at the beginning story seems to be a simple one but as it progresses,the plot thickens.In between erotic scenes,it has held on to it's plot.girls have done well.watching this movie today may not be as exciting as it would have been 10 yrs back but it's a good revenge story.

angiris Let me keep this short because a lot of other people have already said this over and over again...First of all there is nothing new here at all. We have 2 girls and 1 guy just like the first movie again scamming their way through some big shot lawsuit with millions of dollars and so on etc. Everything happens in the same type of order as the first film and not just the events but also the actors lines and even appearances. its all one big copy paste and there is actually nothing else to say except for the fact that this was made for the sake of the money and nothing else because no human individual would create something as miserably low as this for a reason such as art-like purposes or similar... This is business driven misuse of a great script and a shameful excuse for a "sequel if you can even remotely call it that" More like a lame remake if you ask me without any of the good stuff in it. The only reason I gave this a 2 out of 10 is because of the girl on girl action that not only makes this just bearable to watch. Not to mention the fact that without that aspect this "film" would've been completely uninteresting. As in way WAY more than it already is.Thats all there is to say. Nothing but a cookie cutter copy paste miserable excuse for a movie, driven by financial desperation which is ironic considering the fact that they must have spent more on this than what they ended up earning. Big surprise there when you carry over everything from the first movie unto the second one... "sigh".........don't watch this! Not even for the sake of the beautiful women in it! Watch the first one! Neeve Campbell and Denise Richards will give you your moneys worth in great acting and stunning appearances. This is not worth your time.

insomniac_rod Susan Ward shines in this mediocre direct to video soft-core sex flick. While the original "Wild Things" has it's moments of thrilling scenes and a memorable plot twist, this sequel has only sex and hot women running around in skimpy outfits trying to figure out some stuff.I won't get into detail because believe me, this one does not deserves your time or your money.Susan Ward and a threesome scene (better than the one from the original!!) are the highlights. So my recommendation is: watch this on late cable and wait for the sex scenes to happen.This movie is a total robbery and a poor excuse for nudity.

tysonhollen I thought this movie was going to be different than the original one but it seems to be a cheesy B-List copy in almost every way.It contains the same plot as the first Wild Things.The actors and the characters they play look like,act and talk almost identical to the characters in the original.They chose Susan Ward for the Denise Richards spoiled-rich girl role because she looks like Richards.They chose Joe Michael Burke for the Matt Dillion town-respected city worker role because he looks like Dillion and they chose Linden Ashby for the Kevin Bacon obsessed cop role because he looks like Bacon.The only difference between this one and the original is that in this one the rich girl gets the money and the poor girl dies,where a in the first movie the poor girl gets the cash and the rich girl dies.This movie is very predictable after the first fifteen minutes. Calling this piece of trash a great flick is blasphemy.I only rent this one when I can't find anything else to rent. My advice is go and rent the original not this one or wild things 3 either.