Alvaro Azofra Don't watch it. No plot , nothing... just horrible. I know this comment doesn't help ... but im very frustrated at the waste of time this movie is. The whole movie you are waiting for something to happen... but even at the end nothing does... also there are some unexplained things in the middle that come out of nowhere and have no reason to be in the film. The plot would be judged as confused if there was one , the characters have no motivation or reason to do what they do , everything in the movie is a (very) boring mystery that never gets explained or cleared or even hinted at what it was...All in all .. the film "wants" to be different or something but doesn't accomplish anything.

jj_redman I would have to say ironically Wild Seven is worthy of just that, a 7 out of 10. It is a Tarintino inspired western that pits A father, his son, his son's low-life friends, and a retired criminal against a a crazy racist crook. I thought the movie spent too much time on the younger generation when it should of focused more on the relationship between Forster, and Roundtree. And even the relationship between Forster and his son played by James Hausler. There were some stories and scenes that were truly clever and fun. The opening scene with Forster and Roundtree's initial meeting, A trip to a Arizona ghetto to purchase illegal firearms, and then a very comical scene in a gun store for the purchase of ammo and teddy bears. I thought that certain time lapse shots became overused and Loggia's performance was all over the place. Either he would play it down or go way over the top. It is nice to see a young director be so influenced by older movies and taking chances. I would recommend to this movie solely to people who are fans of old spaghetti westerns and dark comedies. Wild Seven is a solid 7

clonedhuman ....that's the impression I had of this movie.It was genuinely awful. For all its edgy posing, the hackneyed dialogue, the poor acting from the twenty-somethings, the plot line that somehow managed to be overly convoluted and boringly simplistic at the same time, and the flat one-dimensional characters made this movie seem like torture by blandness.When I wasn't injecting my own MST3K commentary, I was wondering how anyone could possibly have funded this movie - and I imagined that the fathers of the actors/director were all oil billionaires or something.It's part of the culture of entitlement with the twenty-something offspring of wealthy parents - if you want to make a movie, you can do it! If you want to record a rap album, you can do it! You're great! Here's the problem: Somewhere along the way people seem to have forgotten that creating great art requires talent and imagination. Hell, creating mediocre art requires some talent and imagination. Creating a movie like Wild 7 only requires Daddy Warbucks and an unearned sense of self-confidence fostered by overly-indulgent parents and a true lack of understanding about what makes great movies great.In short ... we all love movies. But, that doesn't me we all can make them. Sometimes you're only cut out to be a fan.

corpseed This is perhaps one of the worst films I've had the misfortune to see all year. Tarantino knockoffs are a dime a dozen but this is truly scraping the bottom of the barrel. Decent performances from b-movie stalwarts Loggia and Forster are quickly overshadowed by hackneyed, clichéd dialog from a writer/director who clearly has no vision or talent. The film is paced with very pretty time lapse photography of the Arizona dessert which I imagine is supposed to invoke some kind of looming dread but instead comes off as some cloying device to extend the duration of the film. The abrupt ending is some attempt at a clever twist but ends up leaving the viewer with the bitter realization that they have wasted the past 90 minutes. I'm astonished that this film is rated so highly on this website.