Wild in the Streets

1968 "If you're thirty, you're through!"
5.9| 1h34m| R| en| More Info
Released: 29 May 1968 Released
Producted By: American International Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Musician Max Frost lends his backing to a Senate candidate who wants to give 18-year-olds the right to vote, but he takes things a step further than expected. Inspired by their hero's words, Max's fans pressure their leaders into extending the vote to citizens as young as 15. Max and his followers capitalize on their might by bringing new issues to the fore, but, drunk on power, they soon take generational warfare to terrible extremes.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

American International Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

SnoopyStyle Max Frost is a young rich rock star and powerful mogul. His band includes Billy Cage, Sally LeRoy, Abraham Salteen, and Stanley X (Richard Pryor). Mrs. Flatow (Shelley Winters) tries to contact Max who is actually his son Max Jacob Flatow, Jr. who has cut ties to his parents. Johnny Fergus (Hal Holbrook) is running for the Senate to lower the voting age. Max decides to support him but he wants to lower it even more. The kids come out to vote expanding the generational divide. Eventually, Max's ambitions overtakes Fergus and even the entire country.The premise is silly. It's a hippiexploitation film. The young people takes over and puts the old people in concentration camps. I don't think a sudden youth takeover can be easily portrayed in a believable way. It would be better to start with that as a given. None of that matters because the most compelling thing in this movie is the presence of the very young Richard Pryor. His role is small and he has few lines. It's the only thing that matters because it's very groovy.
capone666 Wild in the StreetsThe problem with teenagers voting is that they loiter around the ballot box afterwards.However, the adolescents in this musical are more apt to through a dance party.Subversive since infancy, Max Frost (Christopher Jones) now fronts a successful rock group of astute teens (Richard Pryor, Kevin Coughlin, Diane Varsi) that Senator Fergus (Hal Holbrook) would like to partner with.But before he'll endorse the policymaker, Frost wants Fergus to lower the voting age to 14, or else Frost's fans will riot.Eventually, Frost uses LSD to win the US presidency and send everyone over 35 to internment camps.An outlandish cautionary tale about the social tensions affecting sixties youth, this cult classic may have some trippy ideas and seriously catching tunes, but its message of dissent is drowned out by all its bell-bottomed kitsch.Regardless, what good is the vote at 14 if you can't go binge drink afterwards?Yellow Lightvidiotreviews.blogspot.ca
rosiemarie57 For its time this was a movie that made a huge impression on youth. I was about 11 when I saw it and have always remembered it and wanted to see it again. I'd tell everyone about it and no one seemed to have seen it. The song was equally as impressive and I always remember it as well. Made a huge impact on my outlook. Involved politics, teenage idealism, sex, drugs, rock & roll - everything you could want. It was all about youthful rebellion during a volatile time in our nation's history. Did not see it again until 36 years later. Yes, now it is definitely dated and campy, but the memories it brings back are very powerful and I want to see it one more time! Chris Jones rocked, too bad he never made it as big as he should have.
Richard O'Donnell It was Jimmy Fergus who initially brought out the "very best" in Max, who met the former so abruptly on the former's own terms; but, as the kind of modern-day Caligula lingering not too deeply beneath the flimsiest of surfaces in Max, at least when the wrong buttons were even quite innocently and inadvertently pushed; but, particularly, by the kind of "legacy," from "Stiffs," who "live high, and fat, with all the money!"--Or, "at least," given their most miserably poor driving habits, in a way which would have produced the same "high-intensity" reaction, especially from James Dean, and, in fact, did, on many occasions. . . . This is a dynamically thought provoking script, from beneath its more "cultishly caricaturistic" surface; as one of the most timely and relevant yet marginalized and underrated satires of social commentary ever produced, even despite its "grossly absurd improbabilities." . . . Moreover, as for all those "Old Tigers?" Maximilian, baby, couldn't have been more wrong! Just wait and see how well one of the oldest of them is about to "fly!" Yet, nobody but Jones could have carried this lead so effectively, with the kind of professionally well-polished finesse he exhibited. He was truly fated to assume this particular role, just as he blended in so smoothly with the character of Frost, that it's about anybody's guess, from far enough away, as to where he ended, and Max began. . . . Only Shelley Winters had been as "archetypally" irreplaceable here--Along with her Sally LeRoy!--and, in total, an entire cast which it was extremely fortunate didn't have to be replaced. The songs were no less movingly, inspiringly performed as well as composed. For instance, the thought of seeing such a dynamically new paradigm envelop the land, "like a fresh, new breeze," had been something quite overwhelmingly, urgently, inseparably "top-of-the-line!" At least one unsung line is more than applicable today, which goes, "The only thing that blows your mind when you're thirty is getting guys to kill other guys; only in another city, another country, where you don't see it; they don't know anything about it!" . . . I was hardly the first to notice the close physical resemblance of Jones to James Dean. I believe he missed one of his greatest opportunities, and commands upon the scope of his talent, by not having portrayed the role of James Dean himself, in place, for just one instance among others, of a Stephen McHattie--who had no business in the part, either! . . . As for his differences from James Dean, which do run much more than "skin-deep," even in ways which need never have detracted from the uniqueness of the skills of Jones, had Dean been permitted, in this sense, to reduce him to nothing but a "clone?" James Dean had a genuineness, an existential depth, which is not at all the easiest thing in the world to merely imitate!--Save, that is, and short only of the real thing, to the extent that a level of "method acting," on a par with, say, Kirk Douglas, in his purely superficial though movingly convincing portrayal of Vincent Van Gogh, had been adequately at the command of Jones. . . . The only other real waste, next to that of Jones, here, is that Charles Laughton would have played the role of Socrates, as superlatively as he did Gracchus, in Spartacus! As for Jones, however, he did, nevertheless, get a very good "Shot at the Title," of being Dean, at "Home," or, more accurately, in the words of Dean himself, at the "Zoo," and, of course, again, after a car crash, during the opening scenes of Wild in the Streets! . . . Just thank God, if even most of you believe in the right one, that Wild in the Streets is only a fantasy; along with its logically necessary sequel, Children of the Corn, and a gradually renewing expansion of the "Legal Age!" However, perhaps nothing at all, even in such a dismally-conceived future, could possibly surpass, for instance, the reportedly true as well as normatively realistic history, of a film such as Mark of the Devil, with Herbert Lom!--Or, as Nietzsche said, Progress is merely a modern idea, that is to say, a false idea!