Virus

1996 "There is no antidote"
Virus
3.1| 1h30m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 10 December 1996 Released
Producted By: Spill Film Productions Ltd.
Country: Canada
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A United States Presidential bodyguard risks everything to save the day when a truck chock full of biological weapons contrives to crash in a National Park.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Spill Film Productions Ltd.

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Robert J. Maxwell I don't think movies -- even made-for-TV movie shot in Canada -- can get much lower than this.The direction and editing are very poor, the special effects worse than humdrum, the acting egregious, and the plot unfathomable.The only person involved in the production who seems to know what he was about was the photographer. And what he was forced to photograph is just plain bad. Well, I should add that David Shamate as an inquiring reporter brings some personality to his role. He's the only one who does.Algonquin Provincial Park, where I once spent the night in the back seat of my car, is Yellowstone National Park or somewhere, except that it's anything but. There are no real geysers, no lavender rock formations, no Yellowstone Falls, only Ontario late in a dreary gray Canadian winter, a place where the sun never shines.I won't go on about it. It's not worth another word.
mithluin I concur; this is without a doubt one of the worst movies ever made. Do not watch it. It seemed *much* longer that it was, was quite tedious and overall just a horrible movie. Gaping plot holes, bad acting, you name it. It made me seriously lose confidence in the judgment of the people who picked it out to watch. I don't know if it was a budget issue or a script issue or what, but the final product is *terrible*. I would give you a summary of the plot, but I don't think this movie is worth it. The plot is not coherent enough to deserve a summary. The premise is that a deadly virus is on the loose and is going to kill a bunch of people if the heroes fail to save the day. But really, the only people who are going to bleed from the eyes are the ones who watch this movie. If the plot interests you at all, watch "Outbreak" instead.
alicespiral Its one of those sort of films where the hero does the lot-he kills people he steals a motorbike,he steals dynamite from the armoury,he slugs people left and right he blows up a stream which is travelling underground -belive it or not to the very area where the President is giving a speech-and in the end Saves The World!! The only thing he can't do is fly but he probably could if he donned a Cape! Its real lowest common denominator stuff which had over 500 people work on it nevertheless. The distributors must have been bribed with a big consignment of drugs-I mean people have difficulty getting films released which have turned out winners at the box office eg the biopic of Ray Charles was 15 years in the planning and making stages
apw420 This is the CHEAPEST movie I've ever seen in my life.Thermal Wells National Park in Oregon?And I don't get why all of a sudden, every Park Ranger is carrying a semi automatic rifle shooting at KEN FAIRCHILD. CHEAP!!!And did you notice that once these people are exposed to the virus, they just kinda start bleeding and die? I don't get it.And how about the drunken truck driver? If he knew he was carrying the worlds most toxic biological weapons in the back of his truck -- why was he pounding beers and housing pills the entire ride??I've seen better film on teeth.