Michael Ledo We see the killer briefly as a happy child then 20 years later as a killer. The gore effects are lame by today's standards using fake parts and pig guts. The blood spray was also fake looking. There wasn't much of a plot, random people being in the woods getting killed and mutilated. About 30 minutes or so we get some kind of Satanic explanation, that didn't explain much.Guide: F-word, Fake organ nudity and mutilation.

Horst in Translation ([email protected]) This is a 72-minute video by Andreas Schnaas from 27 years ago, maybe more when you read this review. The only thing one can say to somehow justify the bad quality of h'this film here is that he was only 20 years old when he made this. And at 20, being a writer, director and lead actor is something you can, but you also need to have a bit of talent. I see no talent here from Schnaas. It is bloody, has lots of gore and murder sequences, self-mutilation, the full program. Now this is perfectly fine, if you manage to build a story around all this, which somehow justifies it. This is not the case here. It is all just violence for the sake of it and as such it is really repetitive, uncreative and boring. Painful to watch there are many sequels and a very recent remake. Sometimes great films do not get the accolades they deserve or the sequels they deserve, but this piece of garbage here does. Several even. Do not mistake my disliked of this film for being offended. I was not. I was just very much underwhelmed although I probably should not have been looking at the accurate rating it has here on IMDb. It would be an understatement to recommend you not to watch it. I say: Stay far far away.

world_of_weird One of the other users here describes VIOLENT SH*T as "the worst movie ever made by human hands". That's a perfect description, because this terminally boring exercise in incompetently-staged bloody mayhem is terrible on every imaginable level. It makes HEADLESS EYES look like Stanley Kubrick. Shot on camcorder, with computer-generated titles, migraine-inducing video effects and only the faintest attempts at coherent editing (or coherency of any kind), VIOLENT SH*T has the look of a depressing mid-eighties porno, only not nearly as interesting. Its raison d'etre are the taboo-busting gore scenes, but even these are so hilariously inept you're more likely to laugh than cringe - plastic hands, penises, arms, legs, innards and breasts are sent flying as bright pink blood gushes everywhere and the 'victims' bellow unconvincingly. Karl, the 'butcher sh*tter', resembles Eminem with his denim dungarees and cropped blonde hair, and most of his targets look like they've just wandered out of a Scorpions concert with their mullets, thin moustaches, bleached drainpipe jeans and cowboy boots. If nothing else, the film lives up to it's title, because it's both violent and a huge pile of...you can guess the rest. Incredibly, the man behind this catatonia-inducing bilge (one Andreas Schnaas) has gone on to make several other films. Let's hope at least one of them is an improvement over this effort, which is as close a movie has ever come to replicating the sensation of being repeatedly bashed over the head with a tin tray for 75 minutes. Nice when it stops.

eer85 Andreas Schnaas' first feature could be the worst movie ever made if it would be a "real film". In fact, it's actually a homemade feature shot on video. The editing is terrible. Since it was quiet hard to add sound effects, all the splatter sequences are soundless with only a (boring) music playing. The gore scenes are rather bloody, but the special effects are utterly amateurish (as the entire flick), so absolutely unable to shock and\or disgust. The cinematography is less than poor, like a birthday video shot at night with a horrible sound and the story doesn't exists: it's basically an anthology of unconvincing splatter scenes, The only right thing is the title.