Victims!

1985 "Four Girls Alone in the Desert. They All Became His ... Victims!"
Victims!
3.5| 1h25m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 01 January 1985 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Four young girls on a camping trip in the woods are stalked by a pair of crazed serial killers.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Scott LeBrun "Victims!" is an ultra cheap, ultra crude exploitation feature notable for a misogynistic edge. Two lowlife bad guys played by Robert Axelrod and Lonny Withers go on a crime spree, and target four nubile ladies. These ladies have gone into a remote part of the desert to supposedly study rock formations for a geology class, but seem to be more interested in having fun. The cretins proceed to humiliate the gals for an extended period of time.Written by John O'Hara and directed by Jeff Hathcock, this movie looks and sounds pretty damn bad. But the writer & director know what their audience demands, and deliver various scenes of nudity and degradation. They get off to an awfully funny start with a couple of random scenes of tacky violence. Soon, they ease into what passes for this movies' story. Still, even at a running time of a mere 77 minutes, they're obliged to pad the thing as much as they can.The largely unattractive cast give what are some of the worst performances to be seen in this genre. Only Axelrod had a somewhat decent career after this, turning up in some of the Charles Bronson / Cannon Group pictures as well as the remake of "The Blob". That said, these performances *are* fairly amusing in their badness. Axelrod and Withers are stone cold creeps, and a flashback late in the movie reveals the origins of their hatred for women.And that music score! Composed by Glenn Baxley, it's a mind boggling assortment of inane, keyboard and piano based drivel.If the photography were of a higher quality, the use of the desert locations would come off better.This is worth a gander if you're interested in unearthing obscure trash movies, but be warned that it's more tedious than other cinema of its kind.Five out of 10.
HumanoidOfFlesh Four unattractive girls are raped and subjected to sexual degradation by two sleazy criminals.The desert setting is full of screams.After watching Jeff Hathcock's "Night Ripper" I decided to check out his debut "Victims".In comparison to "Night Ripper" "Victims" is far more exploitative and misogynistic.The acting is awful and some scenes are extremely cheesy,but the misogyny is rampant and some scenes of abuse are actually pretty mean-spirited.The film is obviously influenced by "Last House on the Left" and "I Spit on Your Grave",two exploitation staples of 70's.6 out of 10 for this low-budget piece of smut.Can't wait to see Jeff Hathcock's "Streets of Death".
FieCrier The opening scenes before the title involve women being killed by blades, and then some cross-dressing guy who attacks a woman getting chased and caught. There's a voice-over perhaps relating to that that was cut off on the videotape I watched.Following that, a couple guys do a robbery, steal a car, sneak up on a couple having sex in a field, kill the guy and rape the woman and steal their car.Following that, four women go on a geology field trip, and they're unwittingly followed by the two robbers. Predictably, they get stranded and raped, and then fight back. Some Vietnam flashbacks are thrown in to provide some backstory for the two robbers. The ending scenes take place in a police station.It's not absolutely awful, but it's pretty cheap. Possibly older than 1985, though it references the "Two Wild and Crazy Guys" sketch from Saturday Night Live, whenever that was.
one4now4 This is, without a doubt, what everyone will agree that it is: awful, trashy, hateful, and sleazy. Still, being a conossieur of things nasty, I don't think it's all that worthless to fans of awful, trashy, hateful, sleazy movies (and by awful I don't mean movies like the mighty "I Spit on Your Grave", which applies to every trait other than awful in the sense that it was at least well-done). Not that I'm some sicko who gets off on rape or anything, but I did like the earlier rape scene based on its bondage qualities. The movie has some moments that are so cheezy and bad, you have to laugh or cry, which earns it some very generously given minor points from me. But, unless you're looking to blow a couple of bucks on renting this BAD movie with awful sound, cinematography, acting, music, gore FX, writing, etc., etc., don't even waste your time. I would give this piece of crap no more than about a half star myself for the very few substitutes for qualities I found in it, which again is VERY GENEROUS.