adonis98-743-186503
Boyka is back. This time he is fighting in the first ever inter-prison tournament with one knee. Scott Adkins is back and this time he's the good guy i love this film more than the 2nd one even tho that one was amazing this one is even better Boyka is the good guy and he is still kicking ass the best of the 3 for sure more action, more one liners and more Boyka. If you loved the 2nd film you're going to love this one also they are making a 4th one also so i guess it's going to be as good as this one and i hope even better. Like i said fans of the 2nd film will find entertainment with this one also it's better, faster and stronger than the previous film and for sure better than the Original.
feverbaba123
cant say i am very impressed with undisputed 3.it is like those 100s of badly directed Hollywood MMA action films. Now we know in such films , acting is not really a prerequisite but even by those std, there was some serious bad acting and silly dialogs throughout the film. The climax is super-cheesy .I really cringed at that moment where there is a bad animation shown for a fracture of the villains leg. wont recommend this film!The Chinese ,korean and Thailand's are still the best in action genre.Hollywood will continue to be a wannabe just like MMA is a wannabe Muay Thai.
dushyant chaturvedi
Adkins returns as Boyka, the prisoner who is an ace mixed martial arts fighter. He is nursing his knee which was broken by Michael Jay White at the end of the second part. He takes part in the local prison competition and predictably wins. Then he is send off for an "inter prison MMA" tournament wherein the winner will walk free. I must admit that this is the only part of the trilogy which I enjoyed. There is a modicum of effort which has gone on in the development of characters. True, the focus is still on the fight. However, there are scenes which show the development of camaraderie between Adkins and Jenkins who plays an American fighter. The fight sequences are choreographed superbly and are total value for money. The movie does not bore you. The ending is unintentionally laugh out loud. The acting and direction is above average. The background score is good. 3 out of 5 for the Undisputed 3. Watch it for Adkins and the action scenes. Some of the punches will take your breath away.
KineticSeoul
Although I didn't like the first movie, after watching part 2 I thought this franchise might have potential. Yuri Boyka(Scott Adkins) who was the main villain in the second movie is back and this time he is the main character. Unlike the previous movie, this time it's more like a tournament where bunch of convicts must fight each other in the ring and be the winner in order to get freedom. The losers are however eliminated from the tournament. I really liked how Yuri Boyka's amazing fighting skills and choreography is more explored in this one. In fact this movie sort of does make Boyka seem like the most complete fighter in the world. People who seen the previous Undisputed movies know that this franchise is about fighting and you will get good amounts of it and pretty good ones at that. So if you want action you will most definitely get satisfying amounts of it in this one. For a B-movie most people won't be expecting much from it, I wasn't expecting much either but got almost all I wanted out of this type of movie. For anyone who is into fighting movies should check this one out. If there is ever a 4th installment, I will most definitely make sure to see it.6.9/10
