SnoopyStyle American couple Port (John Malkovich) and Kit Moresby (Debra Winger) see themselves as travelers looking for new experiences. They go to Tangier after the war with their friend George Tunner (Campbell Scott) who they see more as a tourist. Port is introduced to a prostitute and is robbed. Kit and George take a train trip. Port is jealous and follows them catching a ride with the Lyles (Jill Bennett, Timothy Spall).It's a grand meandering story about being aimless. It's not just about being aimless but there is also a pointlessness about the movie. The location shoots are wonderfully exotic. Malkovich is chewing up the scenes and Spall is being weird. However the movie struggles to find a meaning.

Colin Billett I discovered this film very recently and very soon after my first reading of the book. The book impressed me greatly, and the film too in other ways. The beautiful prose of the book is replaced by the beautiful cinematography, and wonderful soundtrack. The scenery is some of the most impressive I've seen, and authenticity appears in every shot. Acting is superb throughout, and all nicely controlled and even understated. From a fairly dense book there is of course there is a great deal to condense and there is much omitted, which might make it difficult for people who have not read the book to follow the progress of the central pair of characters. On the other hand, if you have read the book, you might be disappointed that many of the significant points are missing. But if you know the story and are prepared to accept this, you might be in for a real treat.

taniaaust1 I watched and watched this till it's end, waiting to be pulled into it, expecting it to improve. It never did thou and just left me feeling quite disappointed by the end as I believe this could of been a great movie especially with all the great scenery in it.It didn't even draw me in enough, for me to feel any emotion at all, in what should of been very emotional scenes.Im a person who hates Lord of the Rings as it seems to go on and on leaving me bored with plot.. this movie was similar as the plot just dragged on and seemed to go around in circles to me.The most exciting part of this movie to me was seeing some white camels in it! (warning.. don't expect this movie to improve)

michael-1151 Bertolucci's superb The Conformist is one of my all-time favourites, meaningful, succinct, powerful and erotic. The Sheltering Sky is not quite up there with it, it seduces the senses with visual grandeur, rather than emotional significance. Set in North Africa shortly after WW2, not too distant in time frame from his masterpiece, it is not so much an epic without a plot or a love story as some have suggested, it's more a parable, but it needed deeper motivational elements for its' central characters to compel.The majestic dunes of the Sahara, stark beauty of a barren landscape, is beautifully captured, as is the slim sensuality of Debra Winger; she doesn't seem to mind too much about the sand and flies getting everywhere - in one scene, a fly surreptitiously wanders along her thigh and up her dress during love-making with her husband in the desert - an unpaid extra, who nevertheless, contributes to the realism. In my neck of the woods, flies always demand rehearsal fees.What is it with Italian directors and sex in the desert? Think Antonioni's Zabriskie Point, an artistic orgy, mind - not a fly in sight! Believe me, there are plenty here - not just up Ms Winger's dress, but buzzing around buses, in hair, on faces, attacking raw meat on sale in markets, everywhere.John Malkovitch, as the husband, doesn't provide any reason for his professorial ambiguity - married to a beautiful woman, trying to reignite their relationship, but as soon as the opportunity arises, exploring North African prostitution with a wholly non academic interest. And the character of George Tunner, their part-time fellow-American travelling companion, captivated and at the mercy of Debra's charms, seems unaware or unconcerned by at least one of the Ten Commandments - quite a big thing in those days - why, Cecil B. DeMille even made a film about them.I like meaningful films, I liked this one, in spite of - or maybe because of - it's significance being at best eclectic, and perhaps confused. When any movie character does anything, you have to ask why. Here, you shrug your shoulders and wistfully wonder, why not? Luscious landscapes are more for painters. The images here needed more cohesion and purpose behind them. But they are images to enhance your spirituality, eventually providing a warm glow, even in an ultimately dismal context.