Horst in Translation ([email protected]) "Der scharlachrote Buchstabe" or "The Scarlet Letter" is a collaboration between West Germany and Spain and the outcome was a German-language film from 1973. The director is Wim Wenders and he is also one of the many writers who worked on this one. His collaborator on the screenplay was Bernardo Fernández and it is an early career effort from him that also explains Spain listed as a production country. The movie is based on a novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne, who was already dead for over a century when this film was made. It runs for 90 minutes exactly and German film fans will immediately recognize lead actress Senta Berger as well as little Yella Rottländer and Rüdiger Vogler with whom Wenders worked on many occasions. Hans Christian Blech is probably not too known anymore today, but still gives a good performance. Foreign audiences will most likely immediately recognize Lou Castel who plays something similar to a love interest to Berger's character.This is a film set in the 17th century and the story of a woman who gets humiliated because she has a child born out of wedlock. Things get even more complicated when her former husband returns into her life, but only with malicious intentions as he tries his all to find out who is the one that got her pregnant. The answer is: the local priest, which makes the situation even worse, even if nobody (except the audience) finds out about it for almost the entire film. I must say I enjoyed the watch. The actors were good and even if there was a questionable moment or situation in terms of realism here and there (it's okay though, nothing too bad and with some fantasy you can probably explain each of these moments to a somewhat credible degree), it was a convincing watch overall. It was easy to care for them, but Wenders still does not go for cheap emotional affection when it comes to the relationship between characters and audiences, but he goes for convincing portrayals and the characters with all their shades make very much sense. The cinematography is occasionally stunning too. I am a bit surprised this is nowhere near as famous as Wenders' most known works as it has depth, creativity and wit as well as nice dramatic tension from start to finish that will have you on the edge of your seat occasionally. Maybe the reason is that the real moments of greatness and extraordinarily memorable situations can't really be found here. It is still one of the best I have seen from Wenders so far and he proves that he can also make quality period pieces, a genre that he has not touched that much I guess. I certainly recommend the watch.

Tim Kidner I watched this film as part of my lovely Wim Wenders Collection boxed set, with eight films/documentaries, which I'm slowly working through.As an English film lover, who's so used to 'our' often excellent dramas of old, that the thought of a German one seems quite odd and with Wenders normally associated with more contemporary and thought-provoking subjects, perhaps surprising, too.Such films are never going to be my favourites but I can tell immediately that his version here of the Salem-set melodrama looks the part, is well-made and convinces in its period detail. Some of the coastal scenery is impressive, too, with quite a Danish feel, to my eyes. The story is most likely to be a familiar one to those seeking out this, so I don't feel the need to elaborate too much on this aspect. As the central character Hester Byrne, Senta Berger looks attractively regal, but with a distant, cool look and the main men-folk are interestingly featured, facially (in other words, a bit ugly!) but in a not unattractive way. Another reviewer has talked about a heavy musical score which they thought hampered it - true, but this is suited to a slow-moving period drama, as it's all orchestral and musically fitting but also keeps the movie flowing along better. Visually, in parts, it could be rather static otherwise.As I said, I'm no expert on period drama, nor on this story and haven't read the source material, so cannot say how faithful it is. However, it is a well presented, good-looking drama with a good cast and the subtitles present us with a fairly well written script. It is not as dingy and dark as many of such ilk, specially from the 70s, that I've come across and whilst Wenders will never be known for such, his 1973 (so, early) adaptation is well worth watching if you either enjoy the literary source, Wenders himself or indeed, good period drama. The German dialogue will put some off, as will the requisite subtitles and those Wenders fans expecting something more modern, or snappy will be disappointed, possibly very much so.

romina_p Pretty good adaption, but the music was outright silly at times, not to mention too loud... what could have they been thinking? Most of the time the rhythm or feeling of the music had nothing to do with what was happening, it seemed as if they ridiculed the storyline on purpose.In my opinion the actors in general were quite talented, Berger was excellent with those long meaningful looks she cast at the others (Dimmesdale and Chillingworth). The only negative thing I can think of about her is that she had on too much makeup; it got kind of distracting since this was supposed to be a Puritan colony and I'm sure they opposed such practices (especially since she was punished for being a "wh..." and she tried as much as possible to be accepted again), oh well! The filming location was beautiful, but I don't know if the Portuguese landscape convinced me enough to believe it was New England, particularly during the beach scenes that were originally forest ones (and the sense and objective of confrontation, darkeness, and secrecy take on a much heavier meaning in the woods, which just aren't conveyed in the same manner in a bright and sunny beach).The actor who played Dimmesdale wasn't the best choice at all, it made me wonder how a strong-willed, sexy woman (as played by Berger) such as Hester Prynne could have fallen in love with, well, a weakling, who wasn't even strong in the looks department! He was just fainting all over the place in every other scene and it made me want to tell Hester to run away from him as fast as possible and look for a real man!Excellent performance by the actor who played the evil Chillingworth, he was perfectly cast. His overall appearance was downright creepy, well done! The costumes in general had the look of an elaborated school play, not very real at all. Hester's "A" was put in the wrong place; there was nothing remarkable about its design as it's so often mentioned in the book, with the gold thread and all which made all the villagers want to hire her for sewing, an important step in her eventual acceptance. Dimmesdale "A", when finally discovered by Chillingworth was simply laughable, they would have transmitted so much if they didn't show it and maybe just showed Chillingworth's reaction.All in all, considering the year it was filmed, 1973, and the fact that it was filmed in Europe, with European actors (who might not have learned and read the book in High School as it's done in American schools, thus making it perhaps quite difficult to understand and grasp the true meaning of living in those times in a recently colonized area where the Bible was taken literally - just my opinion, I don't mean to insult anybody-), this American classic was very well depicted and acted. The emotions the actors transmitted to the audience were the right ones, which is what in the end counts.If anybody has the chance of watching an alternate interpretation of The Scarlet Letter, you won't be disappointed with this one!

mjgullen Wenders has made some extraordinary films, but this is not one of them. Low budget, poor acting, and a terrible score render this film a total failure; the subtle intermixture of fantasy and reality that is so characteristic a trait of Hawthorne's novel is wholly lacking in Wenders' adaptation which comes dangerously close to unintended parody at times.