The Saracen Blade

1954
The Saracen Blade
5.5| 0h30m| en| More Info
Released: 06 June 1954 Released
Producted By: Columbia Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Based on the book of the same name by Frank Yerby. Pietro is an orphan who is raised by a family friend in 15th century Italy. When the friend is killed by the same nasty baron who murdered Pietro's father as he led the peasants in revolt against the baron's tyranny, Pietro vows vengeance against the entire family. This will prove difficult, since he's been in love with the daughter of the nasty baron since he was a child and wants to marry her.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Columbia Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

LobotomousMonk Like other films in this era of Katzman-Castle production, The Saracen Blade puts an emphasis on tableau (symmetrical composition of mise-en-scene within the framing of a static camera positioned with frontality as the dominant). Castle outdoes himself this time as he adds a new element to his beleaguered stylistic system - suture! The shot-reverse-shot editing system is not only naively constructed and overt, but poorly employed with relation to the plot progression. As a result, there is a stagnant pace. I pity that a talented director such as William Castle found himself compulsively alternating between two stylistic systems for different films. The Saracen Blade is a 1954 release - and one of eight Castle films released that year! If the authorial voice seems mute perhaps it was a result of the man being overworked. The script doesn't help as the narrative is relayed with tweenish 'dear-diary' precision and crossing-guard intuition. If only this film wore a bright reflective 'X' it might become self-aware and develop a set of compensatory unique qualities. As it stands, the film hunches and then limps. Despite each sequence taken individually having the flavor of a bad porno, there is no passion infused into character relationships. All the characters seem sickeningly smug about the conflicts that befall them. But fear not, for Castle would soon break free from a bunk system of mechanical and mass reproduction in the guise of historical action-drama storytelling in order to forge the better parts of a stylistic system that he had been struggling to express for most of his career (When Stranger Marry had established most of the elements).
m Forget about Rambo,James Bond Van Damme etc. this is a truly fascinating and high action film made before fancy special effects and stunt men.Ricardo does all his own stunt-work including deft sword fighting,fancy fist work and horsemanship skills.He also shows a tender side to the hero not unequalled by Olivier or even Bogart. The final sword-fight scene including the sudden death of the dastardly evil enemy "The Siniscolas Brothers" rivals the brilliant performance of Sir Lancalot's John Cleese.Unfortunately this film did not earn him an academy award and I recommend this film to lovers of fast action and Monty Python films.
moshn2002 I loved this movie very much mainly thanks to RICARDO MONTALBAN who plays the role of Pietro the hero. Young RICARDO MONTALBAN is just fascinating: Handsome , charming ,viril , strong brave every talent we expect from a real Man and real Gentelman. He is just the type for this role. He is a tender lover and a brave fighter he seeks justice and is ready to pay the consequences( He offers himself to get the Punishment instead of a woman slave and is lashed on his muscled bare sweating back courageously . no surprise that women fall in love with him , but remains devoted to his true love. I highly recommend this movie to everyone who loves adventure and romance
dinky-4 Frank Yerby's novel could easily have been turned into one of those sweeping, sprawling, big-budget epics -- such as Tyrone Power's "The Black Rose." Instead it emerged as a 76-minute bottom-half-of-the-double-bill feature starring Ricardo Montalban. The results are disappointingly thin but, on the other hand, there's a modest, unpretentious quality at work here which makes the movie easy to watch.Here's an example of the Grade-B dialog. Carolyn Jones says to Ricardo Montalban: "My cousin, Iolanthe, has probably given you her lips." To which he replies: "So? They are her lips." Montalban serves as an easy-to-like hero. At one point, he's stripped to the waist and forced to hug a palm tree as he's flogged across the back. (This scene ranks 94th in the book, "Lash! The Hundred Great Scenes of Men Being Whipped in the Movies.") Meanwhile, in "Queen of Babylon," he's stripped to the waist and bound to a wall so that he can be flogged across the chest. Does this make Montalban, along with Steve Reeves, the only leading man in the movies to get both a back whipping and a chest whipping?