shepardinio I signed up to IMDb just to leave a comment about this film...it was so bad i borrowed a friends hammer to smash my eyes in...the lack of the usual hassan/dyer phrases and words such as tit, slag and caaaant was an even greater disappointment.it was so bad that i'd rather drag my balls through a mile of broken glass in order to press the button that napalms a vietnamese orphanage.If i am forced to watch this again...I will...Hunt you down...And kick u in the nuts!!!That is all

JDtheBigGuy First off all Danny Dyer fans might be disappointed as his character has very little time on the screen.You can ignore the claim by Ty Power that the film tells the story of a cataclysmic event that leaves only 7 remaining people on earth and their desperate struggle to understand the events as they are hunted one by one by a demonic power.All we know right up until the end is that the 7 people find themselves in one small part of London that is completely deserted and they don't know why they are alone or how they got there. It's true that some of them are hunted by Danny Dyer as "the Angel of Death" but the clue is in the name "Angel" not demon.Mostly the acting is good and Ronan Vibert deserves a mention as he stood out from the others, but the Henry Chambers character just doesn't cut it and I cannot tell if that's because the acting is below par or he had a poor script. Whilst on the subject of the script why is it that every film Dyer is in, the F**K word has to be repeated so many times. It is sometimes needed because Gosh or Blast is not enough but all too often it appears as nothing more than a filler to be used whenever the writer cannot be bothered to write. Perhaps Dyer has a clause that says any film he is in "must have a F**king F**K word every F**king three or four F**king words" There are a couple of twists at the end which add to the film and I would happily watch this again one quiet afternoon when nothing else was on.

huntie I found this to be an enjoyable film, well acted, filmed and with an intriguing story which takes some time to develop and also to fully comprehend.The scenes showing a London devoid of people were amazingly well done and set the tone and feel of the film rather well.This film did however, in my opinion, seem to borrow heavily from two other films, 28 Days Later and the New Zealand film entitled The Quiet Earth. To be fair, any film set in London where the population has disappeared is going to inspire comparisons to 28 Days Later.If you are looking for an action based film like 28 Days Later you will be disappointed, this film centers around the effects on survivors rather than horror, although there is an underlying threat ever present throughout the film.The ending contained a little bit of a twist but it made sense when taken into context with the rest of the film. In conclusion, I would happily watch this again.

drklabs Yes Definitely all people worked for this movie must retired and go home ,i hope this was the last movie of them ,no more please thank you its enough , everything and i mean everything it was awful , stupid clichés , stupid plot , cast for a "last of the vampires" movie not for this one musical score for dummies and a sirens of a car alarm what a surprise and we got a movie here.Also the worst of all an army officer in cameo suit peeing for at least 20 min of the movie into a garbage box and then he is hearing some voices "Buhuuuuuuuuu" and " wuaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh"brrrrr so scary and while all people believed that it was a virus or something like "28 days later" then director said "noooo this was in another movie it reminds me something" lets make it different we ll say this was the underworld London or the paradise or heaven London or whatever but this will not convince no one , because GOD DOES NOT TAKING SOULS INTO TAVERNS OR RESTAURANTS this was the most ridiculous part of the movie.Yes this movie really S U C K S. Watch it at your risk.