nagyovamonika 6.6 is pretty low for such a good movie. Guess everyone has different taste but still, i love this movie !!!!

tangreat-bk There are basically two acts in the film and both of them are overlong. The violence feels unnecessary cruel and the payoff is not particularly fulfilling.But it's a well crafted movie. There are many sequences with nail biting tension. Acting is particularly impressive across the board.Not for the fain of heart.

saramgia This starts out better than the original--more character development, less time spent brutalizing, terrorizing, and degrading the victims, and a few other improvements I won't state to avoid giving TMI. The bad part is that the remake requires the characters to be stupid to make the movie longer. They took a good original plot and added every bad '80s overdone technique to extend the movie. So, it was as bad as the original but in a completely different, unoriginal way.

cmovies-99674 PROS: One thing that was well realized was the build up of tension. It almost felt like the film was happening in real time, which gave that extra bit of paranoia to the project. When the movie unraveled it spiraled out of control giving a sort of hypnotic attractiveness. It lured you in and kept you hyper focused on each event, which allowed for the extreme scenes to have no limits, giving it that great tension. I genuinely don't believe that this could've been achieved if the acting wasn't as good as it was. Each character had depth, had more to them than just "a father" "a rapist" "a victim". These were real people, and that came across through the screen. The Final thing that I appreciated was the feel of the movie. It's hard to explain, but the tone of the scene, the weather, and the timing really vamped up the movies importance. To top it all off, the film had a very classic horror vibe which was terrific.CONS: The biggest thing that bothered me was the resolution. It not only felt redundant, but it was unbelievable and not plausible by any means.www.chorror.com