zardoz-13 History veracity doesn't necessarily translate into cinematic virtuosity. The well-intentioned people that fought tooth and nail to produce the lackluster Civil War romance "The Last Confederate: The Story of Robert Adams," a.k.a. "Strike the Tent," are direct descendants of the protagonist. Co-director, producer, scenarist, and leading man Julian Adams, who plays his real-life great-great grandfather Robert Adams, deserves a modicum of recognition for this reverential independent film production that depicts one Southerner's view of the War Between the States. Indeed, Adams garnered several Indie film awards for this effort. Nevertheless, "The Last Confederate" qualifies as a tedious re-enactment with wooden performances by all except Mickey Rooney in a bit part as a bedridden Pennsylvania uncle. Although "The Last Confederate" looks respectable, I have serious reservations about it. I had to opportunity to speak with Julian Adams, the individual who wore all the hats on the production, and he shared his experiences in making the film. Although I didn't like this movie, I have a great deal of respect for the trials and tribulations Adams endured to get it produced and distributed. Anybody who reads this critique can object with my criticism. Mr. Adams took issue with my criticism. Feedback isn't something that I often receive. Had Adams been a Hollywood mogul, I'd have laughed in this face, but he isn't a mogul. He admitted that his film isn't perfect, but it isn't perfect because he didn't have a budget.As the descendant of a Mississippi Civil War soldier, I enjoy movies told from the Confederate perspective, but "The Last Confederate" conjures up little suspense and excitement, and it lacks quotable dialogue. Sadly, the actors and actresses could have been reading their lines off cue cards for all the conviction that they put into their performances. Remember, this is an independent production and quality talent doesn't come without considerable expense. Let's just say that they performed their parts as the late Spencer Tracy observed. They said their lines without stumbling and they didn't bump into the furniture. As the hero, Adams is no Errol Flynn, but then he did have his hands full with producing this epic, right down to sinking his own dough into the handguns and the muskets.Technically, everything appears reasonably accurate. Dramatically, this period piece never generates momentum, even during the explosive battle scenes. Adams manages to stage one modest,close-quarters gunfight toward the end. Meanwhile, the epic scale combat sequences are simply re-enactors fighting battles with cameras set up on the periphery of the action. These scenes with hundreds of dutiful re-enactors parading around and discharging their black powder arms do contribute solid production value, but they don't enliven the drama. Adams shuns making judgments against either side, North or South, but he didn't design "The Last Confederate" to convey a moral message about slavery. Adams assured me that he was simply relating genealogical history. In any case, on his tight budget, adopting an attitude would have been more than his low budget could have accommodated. The romance between Adams and a Pennsylvania woman, Eveline McCord (co-scenarist Gwendolyn Edwards of "The Broken Hearts Club"), who came to South Carolina to teach school before hostilities, lacks any vibrancy. Alas, it's really a shame, but this stuff really happened.Directors A. Blaine Miller and Julian Adams relate their yarn in flashback. Our hero, Captain Robert Adams, rushes to the aid of a wounded Confederate soldier and looks up to find a Union soldier taking a bead on him with his revolver. The remaining 90 or so minutes that ensues is devoted to events before and after the war, and there is a hint that perhaps the protagonist didn't survive this trial by bloodshed. Miller and Adams never make the protagonists seem sympathetic until the middle of the action when Adams and two of his friends engineer an escape from a Federal prison and a grudge-totting Yankee officer chases them. The filmmakers lacked the budget to develop the kind of tension that would make you fear for the lives of the characters. For the record, Adams survived the war, and Eveline and he raised four children and ran a school. What makes Robert Adams is important and essential as a Confederate patriot is never explained. Julian Adams doesn't provide enough insight into his character to differentiate him from countless other characters. He strikes a gallant figure, but we never get under his skin. Alas, the fortunes of low budget film-making prevented Adams from addressing this problem. The romance between the hero and the heroine is sterile. Some histrionics wouldn't have hurt this otherwise flat-lined drama. Shawn Lewallan's color photography makes the grade, but there isn't much subtlety in his lighting. If you suffer through the end credits, the producers reveal that they invoked dramatic license to make their history more palatable. Ostensibly, "The Last Confederate" boasts ambitious intentions, but delivers only a modicum of dramatic impact. Comparisons with the multi-million dollar "Cold Mountain" are inevitable. Initially, when I reviewed this film (which I bought at a Movie Gallery sale, I berated it as "Dull Mountain." I still think it is pretty dull, but I will be a man enough critic to applaud Mr. Adams for making this film. He invested his heart and soul in "The Last Confederate." While I didn't care for this movie, I appreciate it a lot more after having a conversation with Mr. Adams. Just because I didn't like it—for purely aesthetic reasons—doesn't mean that you should ignore it.

CrackinFoxy For a movie made on a low budget, the cinematography is pretty good and has some very good looking scenery. Unfortunately, this one good thing is not enough to overcome the atrocious acting and bad storytelling. The story itself might have been better if told chronologically, rather than using a flashback of a flashback. It seemed like an unnecessary device to use. The lack of any emotion from the actors, especially the lead, led to the story falling flat and pointless. The lead actor just read his lines in a monotone voice like he was reading off of a cue card. It's virtually impossible to have a good drama without either an excellent script or excellent acting. This had neither. I have no doubt that the main problem with the movie is that it was produced, directed, acted, and written by the family. With the same amount of money, someone else could have made a better movie because they were emotionally detached from the content and could have seen the obvious shortcomings.

acmetech Very well done, especially considering the budget. I liked the independent, realistic feel to it, vs manufactured or contrived Hollywoodism.I read somewhere a reviewer saying that this was "revisionist history" wrt this movie's depiction of how the slave owners treated their slaves so nicely. Absolutely untrue... there really wasn't that much depiction of slave owners with slaves to begin with, and to see one white gentleman actually talk nicely to a few slaves was totally believable.That same reviewer also said this movie was about "nostalgia" for the pre-war south. But I think it was more about southerners protecting their tradition, and then finally knowing when to surrender (hence the title "Strike the Tent"). Otoh, the extra featurette on the DVD about how the film was conceived did show that Julian's intention was to proudly depict his much beloved, land-owning family history.The film depicts pre-war southern life favorably, yet doesn't demonize the north (much), even after it's clear that the south had lost the war and had to free their slaves. It was a good depiction of one side "protecting their own", but pretty much intentionally blind to the issue of slavery itself. An interesting "real life" depiction of real history--at least from a southern, white-man's point of view.

bkz2457 OK, first and foremost i like good "realistic" war films, secondly i like films even better if they are based on fact. This was both, and a bonus to both of those critical points is the lead role, who is a descendant of the "historical" character who is the main focus of the film. My wife enjoyed the film too, hard to find a film both of you can watch knowing there's going to be some bloodshed mixed in with a love story, but it works and it works well. Its hard to tell at times this is not a big budget film, but reading about it elsewhere you know its not and you can appreciate it even more. You can see there's a lot of personal effort gone into getting this film made. You see so many people on here saying "well thats 90 minutes of my life wasted" well this is just the opposite, i wish it had been longer, you get a great insight into some real peoples lives during the civil war, and the authentic backdrops and locations just add to its quality.