The Flying Fleet

1929
The Flying Fleet
6.5| 1h40m| en| More Info
Released: 19 January 1929 Released
Producted By: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Six friends, all hoping to become aviators, are to graduate the next day from the United States Naval Academy. When the officer of the day becomes sick, Tommy Winslow has to take his place, while the others go out and celebrate.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

Trailers & Images

Reviews

dglink A slight story of Annapolis-cadet camaraderie and a predictable romantic triangle provide excuses for extensive aerial footage of post-World War I biplanes in flight. Evidently inspired by the success of William Wellman's "Wings," "The Flying Fleet" takes the basics of that Oscar winner and makes a valiant effort to repeat the earlier success. Unfortunately, peacetime lacks the action and dynamics of World War I, Anita Page lacks the appeal of Clara Bow, and the relationship between Ramon Novarro and Ralph Graves lacks the depth of interaction between Charles Buddy Rogers and Richard Arlen.Released in 1929, during the transition period between silents and talkies, "The Flying Fleet" is a silent film with inter-titles that has been enhanced with synchronized sound effects and a musical score. Ramon Novarro and Ralph Graves are best buddies from their days at the Academy into their basic training as pilots. However, when Anita Page enters the scene, the pair compete for her affections, and the friendship is tested. Ralph Graves, a ruggedly handsome guy, is aggressive in his pursuit of Page and often tests the bounds of friendship with his underhanded, often mean-spirited tricks to outwit Novarro. Understandably, Graves's antics tilt audience sympathy towards Novarro, the film's star, who maintains a stoic, sensitive, and dewy-eyed stance.However, the film's best moments are provided by the formation flying and aerial stunts, well photographed by Ira H. Morgan. Although the aerial battles and dog fights in "Wings" remain more exciting, the airborne antics in "The Flying Fleet" are still awesome for the time and a treat for aficionados of vintage aircraft. Novarro retained his handsome leading man looks when this film was made, and his fans will definitely relish his presence and the occasional glimpse of his physique. However, while breezily entertaining, the story is slight and predictable, and, despite the aerial work, the movie pales beside "Wings." "The Flying Fleet" will appeal largely to admirers of the one-time "new Valentino" and to vintage aerial photography buffs.
xerses13 This is our first review of a 'Silent Film' and we felt we should explain the ground rules of our rating. Though the 'Silent Film' is part of the visual medium it should not be considered in the same light as the 'Sound Film'. Nor is it a derivative of the 'Stage'. It is an entity of its own with a separate language, the art of acting in pantomime and visual expression. THE FLYING FLEET is a fine example of this medium. To be correct though, made in 1928 (release 1929) it is a transition 'Silent' by M.G.M. It came at the end of a twenty-five (25) year development of the feature 'Silent Film' starting with THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY (1903). So it had more then a piano, organ or orchestra a synchronized soundtrack. The soundtrack would be used to enhance the visuals and featured Music, Sound Effects and Voice Overs. The InterTitles carried the dialog of the principals (ie actors).THE FLYING FLEET starts with the story of six (6) MidShipMen from just before their graduation. All six (6) are friends and going for the same goal, to become Naval Aviators. The story involves their careers. Four (4) of them FAIL for the following reasons; Trivial, Physical, Fear and Tragic. Two (2) succeed, STEVE (Ralph Graves) and TOMMY (Ramon Navarro) who become involved in a romantic triangle with ANITA (Anita Page). What follows is a standard service rivalry with a logical conclusion. Those familiar with the screenplays of Frank 'Spig' Wead have an instant advantage because he co-wrote it.The United States Navy gave its "sanction" for the making of this film. Which meant its full support. So we are treated to what was then the latest in aircraft and technology. One (1) thing this film clearly illustrates is that the U.S.N. WAS NOT anti-air minded, contrary to bogus claims of General Billy Mitchell. The U.S.N. was very interested in the development of its air-power. The only restraints upon it were monetary and the technical developments of the time. The U.S.N. wisely invested its limited resources in developing its MEN the Aviators. The only AirCraft Carrier footage coming from the converted collier LANGLEY (CV1) a largely experimental unit useful only for training. LEXINGTON (CV2) and SARATOGA (CV3) commissioned in 1927 were not featured at all. Most likely because of their size, second only to the British BattleCruiser H.M.S. HOOD and their advanced features such as aircraft arrestor gear. At that time the U.S.N. thought (rightly) they had most powerful warships in the world.This 'Silent Film' has much to offer the viewer as do many others. For those who have never watched a 'Silent Film' or have trouble watching one (1) we have a few tips that will help out. ONE (1), turn off all the lights and watch the film after dusk so there is no ambient light. The only light should be coming from your T.V. TWO (2) NO EATING you may have drinks but thats it. If anyone needs a refill or go to the washroom pause the film and DO NOT restart till everybody settles back down. THREE (3) 'EVERYBODY' keep your comments to yourself till the picture ends. In other words SHUTUP! No running commentary or criticism. Just because YOU don't get it does not mean you should spoil it for others or YOU do get it and your embarrassed, keep it to YOURSELF. WATCH, LEARN and ENJOY.
Rich Drezen (Drezzilla) This is the second Ramon Novarro picture I've seen (the first being 1925's "Ben-Hur") and it is every bit enjoyable as the last picture I saw with him. Ralph Graves delivered a great performance but I somehow had mistaken him for Burt Lancaster (?!?!?!?!). No joke, I thought he really looked like a young Lancaster (which he couldn't have been since Burt was only 15 when this picture was made). Though it is mainly an adventure film, parts of it are really funny. The funniest moment is when Novarro dives his plane toward his friend on the ground and nearly runs him over. Anita Page was a year younger than me (I'm 19) when she took this part, and as small as her part was, she deserved the upmost praise for her early, but dazzling performance. The synchronized music track is phenomeonal considering that it was produced in 1928. To whoever scored this picture, you're not only a genius, but you made this picture work!
raskimono This high budget MGM movie from 1929 stars Mr Ben Hur himself, Ramon Navarrow, himself, a cross btw Robert Taylor and Ty Power. Here he has the Tom Cruise role of Maverick. In the Val Kilmer role we have Ralph Graves and the girl is Anita Page who would soon have her own blockbuster with the Broadway melody. Highly exciting aerial sequences are undercut by an underwritten and paint by the numbers, extremely broad strokes plot. Some of the sequences seeem like documentaries, though they should play more like set pieces eg the T-1000 morphing in T-2, bullet-time in the Matrix. You are giving the audience something they haven't seen, like they've never seen it. The movie never gives you that feeling or the necessary iconographic images that are usually associated in this genre. This is definitely a movie dialogue would have made better, for there is sound, through, music in the background, sounds of the planes etc but not enough to give the scenes the necessary gravitas to support a story about six friends and their friendship through naval and aerial school. he aviator movie would go on to be a popular genre in the earlie thirties Hollywood with all the studios throwing in their hats. Most weren't good but had a certain gravitas because of dialogue. Facial expressions just don't do the job here. Overall, not the best movie, but luscious cinematography and slightly above average direction, with fine performances all around from the cast slightly compensate but not enough.