Brian Camp THE FALL OF AKO CASTLE (1978) is yet another version of the story of the 47 Ronin, a historical event that has resonated in Japanese popular and literary culture for the last 300 years. If you want to try to understand Japanese culture and the Japanese character, a good place to start would be this story and the different versions of it that have been written and filmed over the decades. This film, directed by Kinji Fukasaku for the Toei Studio, is the third version I've seen (with three more waiting) and it compares quite favorably with the others, Kunio Watanabe's THE LOYAL 47 RONIN (1958), done at Daiei and also reviewed on this site, and CHUSHINGURA (1962), done at Toho. All three versions are spectacular productions and highly recommended, but I tend to like the 1958 film best because it explicitly enunciates many of the key details that westerners would need to know to understand the incident and its aftermath. Specifically, it devotes its first 20 minutes to the build-up to the incident that caused so much trouble and led to the downfall of the Asano clan, i.e. Lord Kira's insults directed at Lord Asano and Asano's violent reaction in the Shogun's castle, a violation of court etiquette so severe it results in Lord Asano's death. We understand exactly what happened and why. In Fukasaku's version, the incident is handled rather quickly and gotten out of the way in the film's opening scene, so it helps to have seen the other versions first. Fukasaku's overarching emphasis is on the grieved reactions of the samurai in Asano's clan. We see how the incident and the death of their lord impacted them and how they reacted emotionally. There is some time spent on other factions and other affected parties, but not much. The overwhelming emphasis is on the men and their emotional states during the long build-up to the eventual raid on Lord Kira's residence and the mission of revenge. As such, I found the whole thing very affecting and there are moments during the big finale (which lasts at least a half-hour) when an audience at a screening, especially during the glory days of Japanese film festivals in Manhattan, would have erupted into cheers and applause.This film has a formal beauty that one doesn't always find in Fukasaku's films. His Yakuza films of the 1970s are filled with gritty street-level cinematography and hand-held camera movement, particularly in the action scenes. There's a whole different aesthetic at work, for the most part, in THE FALL OF AKO CASTLE. The compositions are beautifully lit and designed, boasting a quality that would compare with the visual elegance in both of the cited previous versions of this tale. On the other hand, he brings an occasional chaotic quality to the action sequences and scenes of men in conflict and turmoil that echoes such elements in his Yakuza films. Violence in Fukasaku is rarely choreographed; it's usually quite messy—just like in real life. However, there are moments in the final battle here, particularly when Sonny Chiba goes into action, that are quite artfully staged.Kinnosuke Nakamura (billed as Kinnosuke Yorozuya for some reason) plays the lead role here, that of Asano Clan Chief Counselor Oishi, who takes command of the samurai following Asano's death. I've seen him in a number of films and TV shows, although I had to consult his IMDb filmography to remind myself which ones. (He starred in the Lone Wolf and Cub TV series.) He tends to blend into whatever ensemble he's cast in and doesn't stand out as much as some of his more famous co-stars here. These include Sonny Chiba as a former clan swordsman who assigns himself the job of bodyguard to Oishi; Tetsuro Tanba (YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE) as Lord Yanagisawa, who decides the ultimate fate of the 47 Ronin; Mariko Okada as Oishi's wife, and an actress famous for having played Akemi, one of Toshiro Mifune's love interests in the SAMURAI trilogy; and Toshiro Mifune himself, in a two-scene cameo as Lord Tsuchiya, who occupies the estate adjacent to Lord Kira and makes his position known once the raid begins. I am quite certain that the old samurai-loving crowd at Japanese film festivals in Manhattan in the 1970s would have burst into applause when Toshiro Mifune makes his first appearance here and again when he makes his declaration of support for the raiders. An audience today would just sit there with blank stares while a handful of us old-timers in the crowd would applaud wildly. I must confess I was unfamiliar with most of the other actors cast in key roles here.As you can tell, I do wish I'd seen this in a theater with a large, enthusiastic audience. As it stands, I had never even heard of this film until I came across the DVD, under the title SWORDS OF VENGEANCE, in a sale bin at my local FYE (it was $1.78!). Why had this never gotten distribution in the U.S.? And when Adness released it on DVD, how did it slip under my radar? It definitely should be better known.As for other versions of the 47 Ronin, I have yet to see Kenji Mizoguchi's epic filming of it, made during WWII, or Kon Ichikawa's 1994 rendering. As a completist, I plan to also see Keanu Reeves' 2013 fantasy version, although I have doubts about its fidelity to the source material. There's also a famous TV dramatization from 1971, "Dai Chushingura," also starring Mifune, but I don't know if we'll ever see a subtitled version of it.

counterrevolutionary I rented this movie in spite of Fukasaku's name, so I'm perhaps not the most objective judge. In fact, it turned out not to be as bad as I expected, particularly after the completely inappropriate 70s cop-movie theme music. (I kept expecting one of the investigators to slam Asano up against the wall and ask him if he'd ever picked his feet in Kamakura.) But it's still basically a Fukasaku movie. Where it's a straight retelling of the 47 Ronin story, it's OK. Where Fukasaku inserts his own special brand of action melodrama, it's not; I defy anyone to sit through the murder-suicide scene without laughing.The climax is considerably more Sonny Chiba than Chushingura, and I don't mean that as a compliment.And how much did Toei Studios have to shell out to get Toshiro Mifune for a role that could easily have been played by a bit player who would have been glad to do it for scale? It's not that his presence makes the movie worse, exactly, it's just that...why is he there?

alice_frye This is director Kenji Fukasaku's contribution to the 47 Ronin story, and it represents something of a combination of Mizoguchi's 1941 version and the 1962 version from director Inagaki. Supposedly, Fukasaku wanted to turn the much loved story on its head, but star Kinnosuke Yorozuya used his then extremely high influence with the studio to keep the traditional telling. Fukasaku did get his way with the fight scene, which was choreographed and led by Sonny Chiba, so viewers can expect lotsa action.Lord Asano is not as well fleshed out as he is in Inagaki's effort, so you learn more about the depth of the insult and its significance from the remarks of his loyal samurai. Kira's greedy and conniving personality, so wonderfully conveyed in Inagaki's film, are also less emphasized. Strong supporting performances are delivered by Hiroki Matsukata (the stuttering Shogun Iemitsu in "Shogun's Samurai",) the ubiquitous Tetsuro Tamba and one of my personal favorites, Mikio Narita (the chess player in "Zatoichi and the Chess Expert".) Mifune has a small, but critical role, as well.The movie is a visual treat for fans of jidai-geki (period films,) and maintains a better pace than the 90 minute longer film from 1941. But I recommend seeing Inagaki's "Chushingura," first, if you are not familiar with the remarkable 47 Ronin. Then pick up "The Fall of Ako Castle" for the fight scenes.

IrishYankee I was a fan of The Shogun's Samurai. So you can imagine my reaction when I was at the movie store and saw Big Pappa Yagyuu on the cover of a different movie. I took a gander at the back to get the synopsis and I immediately knew I NEEDED to buy this. It is pretty much the same cast as Shogun's Samurai, it has Sunny Chiba, Toshiro Mifune, the same director and pretty much all the same co-stars. If you DID like Shogun's Samurai, you will probably like this one a lot more. I know I did.This is A lot longer than Shogun's Samurai at just under 3 hours, but it is definitely for good reason. This movie is a film rendition of one of the most famous tales in Japanese folk lore which is the story of the 47 ronin who willingly went to their death to avenge their lord who pretty much got the shaft after attacking another lord in the shoguns castle. The first 2 hours involve only a few fights but it isn't that big of an issue because it is a good story and it has cool camera shots. This part of the movie wont blow you away, but I still really liked it because I'm kind of a dork and the story really interested me. The last 45 minutes or so is a giant battle with LOTS of samurai sword action that apparently was choreographed by Sonny Chiba.There are only a couple of issues I had with this movie. For one, Sonny Chiba only had a very minor role in it which was kind of sad because he is really bad ass(but when he IS in it, he is laying a serious beat down on whatever bad guy is in the shot with him). And the other issue is they could have probably trimmed out 30 minutes worth of footage. I say this because sometimes the camera would wait way too long to finish a scene with a close up on an actors face.All in all, very solid samurai flick. Any fan of Sonny, Samurai Movies, or folk lore(this is pretty much the Japanese equivalent of the Alamo story, according to my Japanese friend) will probably really like this movie assuming they have 3 hours to kill. I liked it even more than I liked The Seven Samurai which is saying a lot, possibly because I like Sonny Chiba, and it had a lot better use of music which made some of the scenes a lot more immersive.