johnmbr I have watched this film so many times I know the dialogue off by heart. It is, in my opinion, the best film ever made. Everything about it is "just so", some things by design and some through serendipity such as when the two horses kiss just at the moment General d'Hubert gets down on one knee to popose to his lover.

lasttimeisaw Ridley Scott's feature film debut is a handsome period drama taps into a historical factoid concerning a string of duels between two French Hussar officers in the Napoleonic era, in this film, the two duelists are Armand d'Hubert (Carradine) and Gabriel Feraud (Keitel), whose overall 5 duels extend nearly 2 decades and their weapon of choice changing from sabers, rapiers to pistols, once on horseback. If you are keen on finding the rationale behind their drawn-out conflict, you may feel a bit unfulfilled, there is no feud or even rift at the first place to begin with, being his acquaintance, Armand's sole mistake is to volunteer as a messenger to deliver some not so jovial news to Gabriel, who is a wacko fanatic of bloodbath, Keitel is outright menacing and snarky in an ultimately underwritten character, because Scott plumps for the chivalry-minded Armand as the cynosure, an accountable decision since he is the one we root for unyieldingly, albeit Carradine's devoted performance, Armand's life trajectory does fall into every bromide along the fragmented narrative: he is an honest man, true to his feelings (doesn't want to settle down with his mistress Laura, played by a spunky Diana Quick, only to be thrown into oblivion perfunctorily) and doesn't shirk from his duty and will fight for his honor till his last breath, with the exception of his noble decision to anonymously save Gabriel from the gallows after Waterloo fiasco, why on earth he wants to spare his arch enemy? In a weird logic, one finally gets the impression that Armand doesn't want their unfinished business to reach such a bathetic denouement, in his heart of hearts, the urge to settle this old score with a final face-off also tickles him, that intrinsic violent id is every man's inner demon, right before their last pistol duel, Armand is simultaneously hot to trot and dreads his possible impending fate. This is what the film brings home to its viewers, less a mockery of foolhardy gallantry than burrowing into a man's conflict between his fighting instinct and its knock- on effects, which also compels us to divine what is the mindset behind Gabriel's outwardly monstrosity, is he psychiatrically impaired or there is something deeply nefarious worth digging (to smear Armand's loyalty toward Napoleon is such an underhand ploy), only if the story could have been a far more even-handed portrayal of them both.On the aesthetic front, Scott makes the most of the its elemental and picturesque natural locales which reminds us BARRY LYNDON (1975), but in a less heavenly fashion, the palette is more muted and more crude in impression. From almost any aspect THE DUELLISTS is a far cry from Scott's galaxy-shattering sophomore ALIEN (1979, 8.5/10) and his canonized Sci-Fi magnum opus BLADE RUNNER (1982, 9.2/10), but this is where he starts, pales in comparison with what he would conjure up in his prolific and prestigious career, nevertheless, it auspiciously breaks his duck, that is not just a beginner's luck.

DonAlberto That Ridley Scott, director of Alien and Blade Runner, is a human being that's being bestowed with an unnatural and sweet talent for telling stories is quite obvious. Yet, with The Duelists he pulls off something out of the ordinary, a film that one hesitates to say what genre it belongs to.You'd think, Mr reader, that as the movie is about the duels between two soldiers of the Napoleon Army, The Duelists would be an epic tale...but no. There's more to it than that. What Ridley Scott gives us with this undeniable masterpiece of duels, honor, combats that span through decades is a drama as well, thereby drawing our attention away from the war. By doing it, a subtle shift takes places since we get to assess the contractions of the soldiers, lives which are seeking for meaning, their lies.Having watched the Duelists more many times than I should, I just wonder why is Mr Scott so interested in going back to the Alien Franchise, when he is so skilled a director that should be able to create some evocative works of art like The Duelists.

Phil Hubbs At the beginning I was growing a little bored with this film, a lot of talk and nothing much interesting at that. Slowly you do get a sense of the two main characters and who they are, what they want, and there is the plot. Two soldiers at each others throats through the Napoleonic era from a simple silly cross of words. It sounds almost stupid but the story shows great human emotion as you follow Carradine's character, watching him grow weary and tired of the feud. Whilst at the same time Keitel is perfect as the egotistical and virtually combat obsessed Feraud who loves a good duel. Feraud's quick temper and short fuse causing the main quibble and many others throughout the story. As time passes we see both characters change and grow in terms of attitudes and maturity as well as looks and styles throughout the age.This is where we see Ridley Scott's attention to detail and his master of visual art. The film looks stunning all the way through from start to finish, the costumes are lavish and accurate right down to the buttons on the men's tunic's (certainly looks that way anyway). The sets are small but look highly authentic whilst the landscapes of Europe are sensational! How Scott got the shots as he wanted is beyond me because it looks as though he made a deal with God for some, he must have waited some time for just the right weather to arrive. Whats more amazing is this was all achieved with no CGI assistance of course. Its all very real which makes it even more impressive and shows just what you can do if you put in some hard graft and really really care about what your doing without simply relying on the lazy digital way out.You would never guess this was made 34 years ago now, the stunning visuals and story play out just as well as any modern historical epic. The sword fights may be few and far between but look perfectly realistic, it really does look as though the men are really having to think about their next move, what they're gonna do next to try and survive. No fancy over the top movements, stunts or showboating for the camera here, its all very strategic looking. I loved the way D'Hubert pauses just before the start of one duel to simply sneeze. Intended? I don't know but its a nice little touch that just makes the moment that little bit more realistic...and aristocratic.Seeing as this was Ridley Scott's first film its a hell of start and really shows his potential. The only thing I would say is the film makes you wanna see more of the history going on around the main characters, alas you don't really see much. Its tantalising and hints at it making you want more but the story feels a tad restricted at times. Watching these two chaps bicker like children over nothing in a very polite way can get a tiny bit stale, but overall you still can't help but adore what you're seeing.9/10