The Dracula Saga

1973
The Dracula Saga
5.6| 1h32m| en| More Info
Released: 31 December 1973 Released
Producted By: Profilmes
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Count Dracula's pregnant granddaughter arrives at his castle, along with her husband, who is not a vampire. While she prepares to give birth to a new member of the Dracula line, her husband secretly launches into a series of affairs with the Count's resident "brides."

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Profilmes

Trailers & Images

Reviews

adriangr The Dracula Saga is a rather ragged attempt at a costume horror movie that sadly fails on more levels than it succeeds. The story follows a young couple travelling to a remote castle in central Europe to visit the remaining family relations of the wife, who is pregnant. Along the way villagers warn them that the castle is evil, and dead bodies are found along the way with neck wounds. Nothing very original there! On arrival at the castle, all manner of strange things happen as the truth about the family background is revealed...which should come as no surprise, bearing in mind the title of the movie! There is a fair amount of nudity, with lots of female cast members removing their blouses, and some gruesome action as well, especially at the movie's climax.Unfortunately the enjoyment of all this is hampered by some very basic shoddiness. Although Deimos Films have found a beautiful clean print, and colours are rich and clear, a lot of shots are out of focus. No amount of remastering can correct badly focused photography, and it really shows. Several shots also have a gauze-like mesh effect overlaid on them, which at first I thought was a technical issue, but in reflection it might have been a failed attempt by the director to add atmosphere. The acting is not very good, the English language dub is truly awful, and in another bizarre lapse of continuity, the heroine clearly wears different wigs in different scenes throughout the story!I suppose this accounts for why Leon Klimovsky never made it as a big name horror director. Having a stunning authentic castle as a setting and adding lots of bare boobs does not make up for all the other budgetary and artistic shortcomings. Even European beauty Helga Line (in a minor role) is wasted here. I do love Deimos' presentation of these Euro horrors, they do very well with the quality, packaging and DVD features. This is just not one of the better movies.
jacobjohntaylor1 There are a lot of Dracula movies made around this time that were great . And this is not one them. This Dracula sequel unlike most Dracula sequels is not scary. It is badly written. Badly acted. It has an awful ending. Don't wast your money. Don't wast your time. Don't see this movie. It is about Dracula trying find his descendants who don't know he his a vampire. He trying to turn them into vampires. This could have been a good movie. If it was not so badly acted. So badly written and had such an awful ending. Pooh pooh, pooh pooh, pooh pooh, pooh pooh, and pee pee to. Don't see this movie. Don't see it. Don't see it Don't see it.
MARIO GAUCI This is another film I had never heard of until recently; being a devotee' of both the vampire subgenre and the "Euro-Cult" style I was instantly intrigued, especially since the copy I came across promised to be of a reasonably high quality, having been released on DVD through BCI – unfortunately, though, I had to make do with the substandard English-dubbing since the original Spanish version carried no accompanying subtitles! I was nonetheless rather disappointed by the end result, even if I should have been forewarned of this via the other titles I had watched from the director involved!; the fact that only one member of the cast (the ever-luscious Helga Line') was familiar to me did not help matters.Incidentally, the general goofiness on display reminded me I had a number of vintage Mexi-Horror efforts still to catch up with; indeed, the film starts off with a truly weird scene in which the heroine (a descendant of the Draculas) dreams she is being literally menaced by a bat-man! There are several more scenes in this vein: one where it seems that all the inhabitants of a village are impaired in some way (hunchbacked, lame, half-blind, etc.), not to mention the presence of Dracula Jr. as a horrific Cyclops with webbed fingers! Bafflingly, while the seemingly obtuse villagers keep commending the Dracula family to the new arrival, they are surprised by this outburst of vampire attacks...duh! For this reason, the entire family looks upon the heroine as the last hope of the vampire bloodline (even if she is not one herself), since the girl is pregnant by her lanky blond husband; when the couple finally arrive at Castle Dracula, she asks the keeper to show her the tomb of her grandmother…where the coffins of the current members of the family are also plainly in sight, which she obviously finds not a little odd! Despite the expected emphasis on nudity (this was probably yet another example of an "International Version") and ghoulishness (with the color scheme intentionally on the dreary side), the film is both plodding (feeling much longer than it actually is) and slapdash (though intermittent 'filmed-through-a-gauze' shots seem at the very least to be intentional, albeit superfluous, or else inherent in the negative!).Ultimately, one regrets the film not being somewhat better than it is, as the script appeared to be striving for something more than the usual blood-sucking fare: the whole ROSEMARY'S BABY (1968)-like subplot, the melancholic/philosophical tone adopted by the atypically elderly Count (though he reverts to camp at the very end when his disembodied head breaks up into laughter!), not to mention a climax in which the leading lady goes berserk and becomes the axe-wielding executioner of her own brood (even if she is herself mortally wounded in the massacre)…though it all contrives to keep the Dracula name alive (after all) by feeding the infant with the dripping blood of its own mother!
Scarecrow-88 Count Dracula(Narciso Ibáñez Menta), his nieces, Irina and Xenia(Cristina Suriani & María Kosty) and new wife, Munia(Helga Liné) are excited at the thought of a new heir, to be born by his granddaughter who has been living in London away from Castle Vlad in Transylvania for some time. Berta(Tina Sáinz) and her husband Hans(Tony Isbert) are to visit and possibly live in Castle Vlad as heirs to Vlad Tepis' estate and castle. What Berta doesn't realize is that her unborn son is drinking her blood from the womb, exhausting her, while Hans has become a victim at the seductive hands of Munia. Meanwhile, the vampires strike locals as Dracula prepares for the grand day of his grandson's arrival, with Berta suffering not only physically, but her steady fear has evolved into mental deterioration, with isolation and the loss of Hans having quite an effect. Director León Klimovsky maintains a really strange ambiance as the film builds towards the birth of a new beginning for Dracula's family. Dracula, as portrayed here, is an old, sad, pitiful sight, while the vampire women have vitality, quite precocious and promiscuous. Helga Liné captivates as always, just when appearing on screen, her power is just magnetic. The pale make-up for the vampire family is ghastly and their existence is equally dreary and decadent. The film is at times wicked, playful, weird, and violent. You have an one-eyed mutant offspring often whipped by Dracula for killing people and is such an embarrassment to him that he's locked away. A bible-quoting priest, who is ridiculed for looking at pretty girls, falls prey to Berta's devious cousins. Liné doesn't wait very long before seducing Hans and he's a willing victim. María Kosty, as Berta's cousin, Xenia, might be recognizable to Spanish horror fans for she has starred in such fare as Jess Franco's Exorcismo, Ossorio's Night of the Seagulls, A Dragonfly for Each Corpse and Vengeance of the Zombies. Tina Sáinz, as Berta, pretty much remains either frightened, paranoid, or off-the-deep-end, and it's understandable since this movie places her in a bleak situation. While there are moments of graphic violence, such as some ax-chopping and a poor fellow's flight down a spiral staircase, this movie wasn't as gory as I was expecting. There's some blood-sucking(..the necking, however, mostly occurs off-screen, bloody throat wounds shown afterward). Castle Vlad is, surprising enough, rather sunny and vibrant, not gloomy or melancholy as those who live within it's environs..quite a difference from the typical Gothic horror flicks which contain a castle, crypt, and nearby cemetery. A great deal of the film is shot during the day, or as the sun rises, another difference from what we are accustomed to. We see the vampires actually out and about as the sun remains in the sky, even though we can tell it annoys/bothers them, until they eventually must return to their resting place. Ends on a darkly comic note with Dracula, all fangs, grinning fiendishly.