jesussaddle
This isn't the film you're expecting. It may not be a film you will like. I liked it. I think I liked it because I like to watch movies that don't turn in predictable directions, that have decent unknown actors, and that have a premise or storyline that gets my curiosity. This wasn't great, but definitely better than most low budget films. The director and actors are worthwhile, and the writing was decent as well, and if you have any desire to watch cult movies, you may not be sorry you watched this, so long as you're not expecting a Hollywood budget and scenes and dialog "polished" for an average audience. That's the thing that generally makes movies appear dull to me, whereas an action audience might be thrilled. I enjoy creativity more than pointless pacing. There is pacing in this movie. But the direction opens up and the characters are given time to be distinctive. This is definitely comedic in a dark, satiric way, and I sense that viewers that hated this film would hate Bill Murray's performance in "What about Bob". Some people don't get certain types of comedy. I'm not saying they're below it, but they only wish they were above it.
Chuck G. (flaminghat)
There I was, minding my own business, fishing for cheesy movies to watch whilst enjoying a late night drinking session. I'd stumbled upon a listing of post-apocalyptic 'classics' and knew I'd hit the jackpot. One of the movies in that list had an intriguing title: 'Beach Party at the Threshold of Hell'. My eye caught, after doing a little research I decided to give it a shot. Couldn't be worse than 'Roller Blade 7', after all...Wow...alright, before I explain why this movie induced violent paroxysms of laughter, I will cover its so-called 'weak points'. Yes it's cheap: there's one scene that was apparently beyond the scope of the makers' budget and/or abilities so it was animated, the costumes are usually jeans and t-shirts cut up, everything takes place in basically one location and the cast is not 'diverse', consisting mostly of the creators in the acting roles. It jumps around and inserts documentary sequences and character introductions that break up the action. It's done in a documentary style that will harsh many a buzz of those used to more straightforward storytelling. If you're Tarantino, Rodriguez or Ritchie apparently that's all well and good, but I digress. There may be further 'negatives', but even the ones mentioned aren't negative to me, so forgive me if something's left out. However, now you must again forgive me as I rub my hands together with devious relish and explain why all that doesn't matter, or at least doesn't make the film any less enjoyable.First and foremost, it made me laugh louder and harder than anything has for a long time. The dialog is great and the gags hit their mark. You do have to possess a sick sense of humor and love of irony to truly enjoy it, but with those two qualifications this movie will take you to fine places. I would love to point out specific things, but honestly, they won't be as funny if you are expecting them. The only one I'll touch is one of the funniest sequences involving some difficulties with a chainsaw. That's all you're gonna get. Just trust me on this, if you're a sicko, your gut will be a-bustin'.Now to address those alleged weaknesses: the documentary style does slow it down, sure, but it's a comedy. It's not an action-packed thrill-ride that needs to move quickly. It was pulled off very well and allowed for the inclusion of some very good and funny cameos, such as Jane Seymour as the last President, Tony Hale (of 'Arrested Development' as Buster) as a biographer and Richard Riehle (who played Tom in 'Office Space') as the narrator. Some may think the documentary bits padding, but I truly think it adds an element of tongue-in-cheek quirkiness to the proceedings, and while perhaps the characters could have been introduced in other ways, I thought their way was far more interesting than characters busting into monologue or ill-fitting dialog. Some may think it a rip-off of other directors, but I say thee 'nay'. What they did always felt more like respectful hat-tips than straight rips, though there were many. The whole feel of the movie is very Dr. Strangelove meets Pulp Fiction, and I say that as a means of description, not really to compare this film to those others. Even at its most serious it doesn't take itself a bit seriously, but it's imaginative and well-written enough not to spiral off into pure goofiness. Campy, yes, insipid, no.Bad acting? I have seen bad acting (I've seen 'Men of Honor'), and with a cast of primarily amateurs the acting is actually very good. Hell, even Daniel Baldwin didn't suck, and that's saying something! But the actors had a lot to work with and had reason to do a good job, for the script, again particularly the dialog, is excellent. I'm not even going to qualify that with a 'for a low-budget movie' or anything. It is just GOOD. It's sharp, and is sharply delivered. The characters are weird but cool and well-played. These are not the typical post-apocalyptica stereotypes, but something altogether different and, dare I say, brilliant. What else do you need? But wait, there's more!There's blood and gore, as one would expect of post-apocalyptic fare, and quite a bit, but done well (though certainly not tastefully) and death scenes that would look cheesy are given the 'go to black' or 'blood spatter on lens' treatment, avoiding the typical groan-and-eye-roll moments that plague horror movies. It's also done with great sick humor. For instance, a spine gets pulled and in later scenes you can still see it lying on the ground as other situations play out in the same area. The much poo'd-upon animated sequence is actually cool, and a smart move on the makers' part. I'd much rather see animation, adding more quirk to the quirky, than hokey live-action. As opposed to simply axing the bit, they use it to make their movie even weirder. I for one dig it and applaud them for it.I could go on, but this beast needs to be wrapped up. In summary, I think 'Beach Party' is simply a great movie, funny and wrong in all the right ways. It stands up against the best the big companies have to offer, and with a fraction of a fraction of the budget. It's a fine example of what indie developers can do with heart and inspiration. If you want big budget fluff, look elsewhere. I for one will not miss you. If you want a to spend a hour-and-a-half chortling and feeling like a misanthrope for doing so, please, for the love of all that is sick and unholy, look this movie up, then tell someone else. That's the only way to make sure that movies like this continue to be made, as they damn well ought to be.
jcerise
This is the biggest pile of crap I have ever watched. DO NOT RENT! The makers of this movie should be band from ever making another movie. It starts with some what of a plot, then fades fast to nothing. I think I would rather watch paint dry then to as much as looking at the cover. The actors were awful, the plot faded fast, filming left to much work to be done. Not one good thing to say about this crap movie. If you rent this movie you will waste your money. I really enjoy National Lampoon movies, but this was a waste of time. Learn to write, learn to act, learn to produce, and learn to direct. I feel I should sue these a-holes that made this movie for money wasted on rental cost and time lost.
