crunchycloset This is a terrible movie, the history don't surprise, the cast of actors are the worst and the lighting is a shame!

kmarialm It was slow, anticlimactic, and poorly executed. Bad acting. Poor camera crew. It was like a cheap made at home $100 movie. Would not recommend

keylamichelle STThis is probably one of the worst movies ever made. The acting was horrible. The lighting and sound was awful. I really wish I could get my money back. It was poorly made and cheesy. I don't even want to waste anymore time on this movie and keep writing. Save yourselves this movie stunk so bad it made me mad.

Laiath If you can get over the horrible lighting, the God awful camera-work (think shaky and out of focus quite a few times), and Tommy Dreamer's annoyingly bad acting, it's actually a pretty good movie. I'd never watched anything with Rachel Jane Conn in it before, but turns out she's one hell of an actor. She could teach some of the so called A- listers a few lessons in how to scream like you're in actual pain, or conveying a plethora of emotions with your facial expressions alone (looking at you, Kristen Stewart). James Duval was also great, but can't really comment on his acting without giving spoilers. I really liked the premise and the script as well, and the twist, and even the ending. Those are really rare in B (or C, in this case?) movies. Go ahead and give it a shot; you might like it too.