JoeytheBrit This early Hepworth film is fairly humorous but it carries on for far too long and drags in the middle because of the repetitious nature of its scenes. An old man plays a trick on a youngster with pepper causing the boy to sneeze uncontrollably. The boy, who, it has to be said, appears ever so slightly effeminate (and might have been played by a girl), gets his own back by peppering the old man's hairbrush, handkerchief, hat, etc while he sleeps. In the morning the old man's sneezes are so powerful that things in their path collapse and fall apart or fall off walls, etc. The sneezes keep on building until they create an earthquake and then cause the old boy to explode.The last minute or so of the film is probably the most effective. Where a filmmaker today would use a shaking motion of the camera to transmit an earthquake, the cameraman here rocks the camera back and forth, eventually slowing down to signify the passing of the quake while the old boy hangs on to a lamppost. It's still quite an effective little trick. Overall though, the film went on far too long for what is essentially a one-shot joke.

bob the moo An elderly man plagues a small boy by putting pepper all over his food and making him sneeze uncontrollably. Later that night when the man is asleep the boy sneaks into his room and puts pepper all over his clothes and possessions. The next morning sees the man unable to stop sneezing but it is not the frequency of the sneezing that is the real problem but rather the power.Firstly you really need to try and ignore the performance of the young boy in this film because he is awful; and not by modern standards but by the standards of those around him as well. His fist waving at the dinner table is so unconvincing that I was laughing before the jokes started coming. Outside of this though (and he keeps mincing along in each scene) the film is actually pretty amusing and is a very good example of early special effects humour and the destructive sneeze gag that others continued to use afterwards. The various scenes of things falling apart are amusing and mostly very well done even if some are better than others. The final shot is a simple cut but it was delivered very sharply, well edited and in time with the music and it worked really well.Worth seeing then because as well as having value as part of cinematic history in the UK, it is also genuinely quite amusing.

Snow Leopard This is an interesting combination of some very good camera effects and a very silly story. Overall, it's still worth seeing, even as long ago as it was filmed. The premise is no flimsier than those used for a lot of full-length features in more recent times, and the camera work holds up quite well.The simple story starts with an older man and a youth (apparently relatives of some kind) playing practical jokes on each other with pepper, and soon things get out of hand, with some outlandish results. It's thoroughly goofy, but because the camera effects are done well, it works well enough to be entertaining much of the time. It does go on a bit too long, and would probably have been better if they had not drawn it out quite so long before wrapping things up.

cmmchale2 Granted, this is not profound, earth-shattering filmmaking of the sort to change lives and open minds. It's still fun, imaginative in a way that--so early in film history--had the flavor of unknown possibilities. Now that we know we can do anything via computer graphics, there's so little joy in trick photography and special effects via rigged props. Its strength is its rough edges; this is film in evolution. And the way they chose to end this film is nothing short of priceless.