Alexander_TheOne
Out of 2100 movies watched. I would rate this as the worst pure, utter bullshit I've ever seen. (Haven't watched vampires suck yet.) The script seemed to be written along the way, Acting, Costumes and effects are among the most ridiculously bad someone could possible do.They used the name, the genre to make money. It's the only ambition and reason people who made it had.I honestly wonder if the director himself even would/have watch/ed the movie more than 1 time..To sum it up, avoid at all cost. Watch only if you are a huge movie nerd, or want to see how to absolutely not!!, make a movie.
FlashCallahan
I'm not a fan of the Scary Movie franchise, or those blasted ..... movie movies, so I knew what I was letting myself in for, but in the back of my head, I thought, just one of these movies, just one, could change the way they make these movies.It's still need to be made though. There is one good visual gag involving the Ring right at the beginning, and then it goes way of the old toilet humour and sexual innuendo gags at every level possible.The cast are given very little to do, apart from scream, act really stupid, and just generally irritate the audience.Story is silly but to the point, titular character has to deliver some videos (even though there DVDs) and ends up getting lost and the townsfolk mistake him for Hugh Jackman.Cue lots of unfunny jokes referencing slasher movies of the eighties and Leslie Nielsen in a wig and make up.It's as bad as it sounds.I wish I hadn't had bothered.
hr-boege-546-170392
again i was talked into watching a movie that was bad. i don't really have any positive comments, only negative ones. its basically just a load of cultural and horror movie references thrown together in a thin story from a bad road movie. my main critique is the cultural and horror movie references. first of all, cultural references ARE NOT FUNNY, and they get dated really quick. the horror movie references are done pretty lame and cheap. they just took some well known characters and changed their appearance a bit, as well as changing some scenes from a few horror movies. the plot is really really bad and so messed up that i couldn't follow the story. they just go from one location to another, without making any sense. the only positive i have to say is that i had 1 or 2 giggles, they used a Johnny cash song and the movie is only 90min (thanks god for that). i will only recommend this movie to you, if you are really stoned, drunk or retarded (no offence for any retarded)
Diorafan05
Last year I developed a big addiction for mindless slapstick comedy. I made it my objective to see all the spoof movies that released over the past couple of years. The first movie to start this genre was 'Scary movie' It is a classic and possibly the best of the franchise. Originally it was the 'Naked gun' series which made this genre popular back in the day. Other average films released such as 'disaster movie, date movie, epic movie, and superhero movie followed, which didn't quite live up to expectations, but were fun to check out. Spoof genre still exists and I'm eagerly awaiting 'scary movie 5'. My expectations are not too high due to the average outcome of 'scary movie 4'. This genre still exists and I'm eagerly awaiting 'scary movie 5'. My expectations are not too high due to the average outcome of 'scary movie 4'. Jason Frietzberg and Aaron Zetzler started this but lately the quality is lacking in their movies. Stan Helsing was a low profile film that received a limited cinema release in the states and only got a DVD premiere around the world. When viewing one can understand that it doesn't possess the big box office potential. Reasons for this are obviously due to the lack of big names and absence of plot. But this doesn't deter one from enjoying it. The only reason I seen it was from noticing Diora Baird in the cast. But I admit I was pleasantly surprised from the endless adult humour and double meaning jokes. The only problem is that it doesn't make for viewing with the parents. The crass comedy may not be appealing to everyone. But it depends on one's individual comedy tastes. I think the failure of the film resulted from the non existence of a plot. Okay so a video store clerk wanting to deliver a collection of porn to a customer isn't very appealing. But what makes this watch-able is the endless comedy situations. The entire movie is shot in dark surroundings. And we follow the four characters who are to attend a Halloween party, make a detour to give a porn collection to a customer. On their way they get lost in to a quiet town and attempt to find a way out. Throughout the film there are countless horror movie references that are made in a funny and sarcastic manner. Unfortunately some comedy is forced and seem out of place at certain segments and over done. The horror movie characters were not required. They were not involved to any purpose and seemed pointless. The horror movie characters were not required. They were not involved to any purpose and seemed pointless. To add to that the ending was also pathetic. But one shouldn't expect much from the climax anyway. It reminded me of 'the police academy' movies, where something just happens at the end to give the movie the final touch.Bo Zenga who happened to be the executive producer of the 'scary movie' franchise directs this comedy. I think he did a commendable job. He also happened to write the script to the movie. I enjoyed the sex jokes. They made me laugh. It didn't come across as anything forced. Going by the reviewers on here, I can only assume that they don't find these kind of skits enjoyable. This isn't a plot based comedy movie and the entire focus is on the dialogues and jokes. It is a pity that people didn't realise this.