Siren555 This movie is a treasure. Michael Rapaport perfectly plays the part of the downtrodden protagonist Les, absolutely luring us in with his character's purity of heart. Without being gimmicky or vague, Haberman and Passmore's direction and writing achieve a complex balancing act in terms of what is really happening with Les. There is pathos, humor, and, ultimately, a tale that speaks to the underdog in each of us. Note the name of the lead character: Les, as in "less." Michael Rapaport has been around as an actor for a while now, but I can't say I've seen him in anything else. As Les in "Special" he has definitely made an outstanding first impression.

FollicleMan Special is a well-made movie. The visual style and performances work excellently to build characters and situations that we care about. Unfortunately, the filmmakers' overeagerness to create drama and catharsis undermine the premise of the film and strain suspension of disbelief beyond the breaking point. Michael Rappaport's mild- mannered schlub Les joins a clinical trial for an antidepressant. Shortly after beginning his dosage, he gains super powers. Or does he? Unfortunately, the film doesn't let the ambiguity linger: the first time he shows off his powers to his doctor, we see from an objective perspective that they're all in his head. The doctor instructs him to stop the dosage, while Les hears him "telepathically" encourage him to continue and enhance his powers. He dons a costume and sets out to fight crime, tackling random people and drawing attention from the police. While running from cops, he gets picked up by the two wealthy young sponsors of the drug, who tell him to stop taking it, since his adverse reaction could ruin their chances of marketing their product. And here is where the movie ceases to play by its own rules. The main source of dramatic tension is the contrast between Les' delusions of being super powered, and everyone else's recognition of his actual normalcy. A strong hook with a lot of potential. However, this dynamic depends on other people's reactions to Les being recognizable as the kind of thing a normal, sane person would do. But this is not the case. Firstly the villainous sponsors. After thousands of successful cases, one subject with side effects will destroy the marketability the drug? Rather than simply putting a warning label "0.01 % of users may experience hallucinations, paranoia," or bribing some bureaucrat, they seem to think the best way to deal with the Les problem is by bribing him, the guy they think is crazy, even after he stabs Jonas in the ear with a chopstick. They later try to beat him to death and run him over, as a plan B. Wholly unbelievable. After escaping his would be murderers, Les runs to his local convenience store and throws himself, bleeding and exhausted, at the mercy of the checkout clerk, whom he once tried to ask out. It turns out she has a severe stutter, which is why she didn't respond to him before. How could a woman with a prohibitive speech impediment hold a job where she has to talk to customers all the time? Then, telling her he "finished the bottle of pills," Les convinces her to let him stay the night in the store bathroom. Who in their right mind would let someone with severe head wounds and a possibly lethal drug overdose go to sleep, instead of going to the hospital? I understand why the filmmakers put these scenes in: so Les can overcome adversaries and engage in a sweet character moment. But they are simply too absurd to accept, and pulled me out of the story completely. The film is still worth watching, but could have been so much better if it simply committed to its premise and avoided the illogical melodrama.

rooprect Aside from the time I spilled hot coffee on my lap during "Fiddler on the Roof", I'd say this is one of the most powerful experiences I've had while watching a movie.This quirky gem of a film is 25% comedy, 25% tragedy, 25% feel-good, 25% depressing, and 100% awesome. Starting off with the most preposterous plot (i.e., a lonely metermaid guy develops special abilities and fights crime while running from strange men in suits), it quickly develops into much more than meets the eye. It's essentially the story of the lone, forgotten individual who's trying to make a difference in this world. In that respect, it can be a sad film. But at the same time it can be funny, warm and deeply inspiring.Thanks largely to an absolutely brilliant performance by Michael Rapaport as the metermaid guy, this movie takes you on a crazy ride through every emotion you've ever had and some you haven't had yet. I laughed, felt sad, felt angry, felt the warm fuzzies, felt pity and felt empowered. I can't remember the last time I cared so much about a movie character. It's funny because I began watching this film not liking him very much (after all, who likes metermaids??), but quickly he became one of the most lovable misfits since "Amélie".Never have I seen the plight of the superhero so wonderfully presented and fleshed out in human terms. Whether we wear a cape or not, we're all trying to change the world in our own ways. You, yes you sitting there reading this, could be a superhero. This movie presents us with that idea, and (unlike Spiderman, Batman, Catwoman, etc) it does not slip into fantasy territory where we lose touch with our perspective. Instead it remains firmly rooted in reality and thus allows us to see ourselves in the hero's role. That's where this movie draws its power to affect us. It's the story of us all. Watch it and learn about yourself & the people around you.Other great, obscure movies that this reminded me of: a Michael Keaton film called "The Merry Gentleman" (2008), a must-see Korean movie called "The Foul King" (2000), and a powerful Australian flick called "Noise" (2007).

twiswall The acting was tolerable...but who could really care about the acting. The movie was boring, the story line was idiotic, I don't have enough time to write how much my wife and I hated this movie. At this very moment I can't even say why I sat through the whole thing...bad bad boring movie.One last comment...a comedy...are you serious??!?!?! This was a depressing story about a guy who loses everything because he was prescribed a medication that had really bad side effects. That in no way shape or form is a comedy...a tragedy yes...but a comedy...I think not. Did I say this was a bad movie yet....?