JohnHowardReid Copyright 12 July 1947 by Loew's Inc. An MGM picture. New York opening at the Radio City Music Hall: 9 October 1947. U.S. release: October 1947. U.K. release: 27 October 1947. Australian release: 28 August 1947. 10,788 feet. 120 minutes. SYNOPSIS: Robert Schumann's success as a composer seems assured when he marries the celebrated pianist Clara Wieck, despite her father's strenuous objections. COMMENT: Great music, marvelously performed (even by the normally lackluster MGM Symphony Orchestra), studding a story which although sometimes banal and always over-romanticized (and rather indifferently acted by Henreid and particularly Walker) maintains the interest. As usual, our complaint is that the scriptwriters would have made a more colorful and enthralling film out of the real facts instead of the half-truths here presented. For instance Professor Wieck opposed Schumann's marriage to Clara not only on the grounds of his lack of prospects but because of his mental instability and drunkenness. He had already attempted suicide in 1833. As for the acting, I think the producer should have switched the lead roles and cast Walker as Schumann, Henreid as Brahms. However, we have no complaints with the other players. Hepburn is perfect and her piano-playing looks so skillful, we can readily believe that she (instead of Rubinstein) is actually supplying the music. The movie's other stand-out performance is provided by Henry Daniell, who not only looks like Liszt, but conveys the vigor, the enthusiasm, the calculating passion that the great composer undoubtedly possessed. Although confined to a few early scenes, Leo G. Carroll makes a forceful impression as Clara's father. We like the way he sits behind her at the opening concert, whispering directions. Brown has directed the musical sequences with an agreeably fluid camera style that reinforces the baroque vastness of the concert hall sets, packed with costumed extras. Photography and other credits are likewise smoothly stylish in these musical recitals. By contrast, the domestic scenes are handled in a surprisingly pedestrian fashion. A few attempts to leaven them with slapstick comic relief seem both clumsy and inappropriate.A pity we don't see a lot more of Daniell, a lot less of Henreid and Walker. Never mind, the music and Hepburn's radiant acting and skillful miming, make up for a lot.OTHER VIEWS: Exquisite music in this talky but ingratiatingly acted (particularly by Hepburn and Daniell), superbly photographed and set, period comedy-drama. Hepburn gives a luminous performance. Even Walker is sincere and convincing, the costumes are A-1, the sets splendid with Brown and photographer Stradling making great use of them, the sound recording, while it has some unfortunately tinny moments, particularly during Liszt's recital, is of a higher standard than we might expect of MGM and a fine array of character players including Byron Foulger's court attendant, and Francis Pierlot's congratulating musician are on are on hand. Brown makes splendid use of Hans Peters' magnificent sets and the milling crowds of extras, even indulging in a few bravura effects like the dazzling dolly back through the miniature of the concert hall set (marvelous special effects by Warren Newcombe) right at the conclusion. Superbly atmospheric photography by Harry Stradling makes the sequences with dreary old Paul Henreid almost attractive to look at. Henreid is actually well cast as the lackluster Schumann who after his vigorous opening scenes in which he stands up to Leo G. Carroll's awesome martinet, spends the rest of the film being dominated by Miss Hepburn and feeling sorry for himself, through into effectiveness again in his concluding scene at the asylum (Clinton Sundberg as the doctor). This movie provides a feast for music lovers, and it's certainly good to get away from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer's usual escapist fare.

Boba_Fett1138 I don't quite understand how people can see this movie as a serious biopic. It has all the typical ingredients and feeling of a romantic/musical MGM movie from the '40's. Not much in it that makes this movie distinct itself.Yes, it's really one of those movies of when you've seen one of them. you've seen them all! Don't get me wrong, "Song of Love" is not bad, at least not worse than other same type of genre movies but it's also not any better. The movie is far too formulaic for that.You can say that the only real redeeming quality of the movie is its music. It features the music from composers Schumann, Liszt and Brahms (characters also appearing in the movie). It's really beautiful music to hear and it gets featured prominently in the movie.Nothing wrong with the acting in this one. Katharine Hepburn was real great. I also liked Paul Henreid, who has also appeared in another couple of good well known movies. Not every character gets ever really deepened out unfortunately. It makes the movie with its drama mostly shallow and therefor the movie also doesn't leave a very big impression.If you like these type of '40's MGM movies this is of course a perfectly good watch or you. It features all of the ingredients and way of storytelling and it also most definitely has the same typical atmosphere all over it.6/10http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

dschc535 First of all, Katherine Hepburn is badly miscast as Clara. She just can't be convincing as the devoted, selfless, rather smarmy wife that the writers have created.But the real weakness of the film is its shallowness in the face of a potentially great piece of drama. Schumann's bipolar (manic-depressive) disorder amounts to "Oh, oh, I have a headache" and the occasional angry word. Suicide? The word is used, but there's no sign of it in domestic scenes and when we see him in the mental hospital he's calm and subdued and smiling and optimistic. A superficial treatment. And Brahms is so upright and bourgeois - no sign of his gruff humour, his love of tweaking the noses of the establishment, no sign of his tortured attitude toward sex and women resulting from spending his youth playing piano in brothels. And was Clara's long concert career entirely about promoting Robert's music, or was she, in fact, a remarkable pianist who wanted a career for herself, a female pianist carving out a place for herself in a male world? Any sort of treatment of the lives of great artists is better than none, but this is a standard Hollywood, middle-of-the-road approach, particularly disappointing because the real story is so much more dramatic, so much more interesting, so much more human.

JBall75487 Yes,we can ignore the opinions of the pedantic musical historians who belittle this film, because this is one for anyone with a love of music ! In essence, historically accurate - Brahms was a friend of the Schumanns, Robert did suffer from a brain disorder which drove him to attempt suicide and caused his early death, Brahms undoubtedly loved Clara, but she remained faithful to Robert for the rest of her life, whilst she pursued the career of a piano virtuoso (which she was).All of this adds up to a romantic story with all the necessary ingredients plus the music of Schumann and Brahms,(played with customary brilliance by Artur Rubinstein) surely a guarantee of success. The three principal characters are played with a reasonable degree of authenticity, indeed, Robert Walker bears such an uncanny resemblance to Brahms as a young man that one suspects he may be a descendent ! And what a tour-de -force is Miss Hepburns characterisation of Clara Schumann, a woman, by all accounts, possessed of steely resolve and immense courage. The only relatively weak link is Paul Henried, who bears not the slightest resemblance to Schumann, and fails to convey Schumann's determination and musical genius - perhaps a little pedestrian and lacking conviction. The performance of Henry Daniell as Franz Liszt is superb, projecting the personality of 'the Master' to perfection, and particularly worthy of note is his 'performance' of Schumann's 'Widmung', where his simulated pianistic technique is incredibly accurate, indeed, one suspects that he may well be a competent pianist in his own right. The whole essence of this drama is conveyed with a flair and a grasp of the subtle nuances of the various relationships which generates an astonishing degree of authenticity, almost as if we are seeing the events as they actually happened. Add to this the music, the pianism of the incomparable Rubinstein, and a classic has been born to stand the test of time ! As a matter of interest, Schumann composed the song 'Widmung' (Devotion) at the time of his marriage to Clara - the music 'played' by Henry Daniell is,in fact, not the original song, but an arrangement by Franz Liszt.