Alan Hathaway I first saw this film a few years ago, and I thought it was pretty good. It was entertaining, kind of funny, and overall a pretty good movie for children. However, not that long ago I came onto IMDb to check what rating it had. Now I wasn't expecting a huge score, maybe a six point something, five at the very worst. But 4.9! That is completely underrating a film that really isn't that bad!There really wasn't too many faults in this film. There was a bit of fantasy, some quirky characters and some pretty good special effects. The plot wasn't some sort of masterpiece, but it was straight forward enough for children to understand, which is good, because it's a children's film. I quite like the way the story was told, how it was narrated from the main character's point of view and how they didn't quite tell it in order. I think one of the reasons why this film was hated so much, is because most of the people who did hate it were adults, and this is a kids movie. For example, lots of the comedy in it would be humorless to adults, but would make kids crack up. But like I said before, this film is meant for young kids, so why does it matter if an adult doesn't find it entertaining?So while this movie isn't any masterpiece, it is still a good film, and one that has been looked down upon. So if you're and adult, maybe you could let this one pass, but for young kids, it's definitely worth a watch. Alan Hathaway

maitreya21 I love James Spader, he's a very talented actor and i watched this rubbish, for him. I hated it.Jon Cryer is wonderful on Two and A Half Men but in this movie we can't see him. There are a lot of children and they can't act at all.Robert Rodriguez is a good director but can i ask him "what the hell is this?" This is not movie for child i think, kids don't watch this movie, because it's really a rubbish.And the little girl Helvetica is the new version of Christina Ricci, but only she can act. Two stars, for her.If i could wish something, i would wish this; "Please don't play in this movie, James Spader, i'm begging you".

brownah18 There is a black box that does everything you need and it provides so many jobs for the town including Jimmy Bennett (Toe Thompson) parents Leslie Mann (Mrs. Thompson) and Jon Cryer (Mr. Thompson). Toe finds a rainbow rock that if you are holding it, you can wish for anything you want which everyone in the neighborhood seems to figure out once they get a hold of it.Jimmy Bennett, recently played the younger James T. Kirk in the new "Star Trek" does a really great job narrating you through this movie and has been moving his way up starring in more acting roles. Mann and Cryer are well known actors as well as Kat Dennings and William H. Macy also starring in this film. This movie gives you laughs and is really interesting to see if you had a rock with the powers to do anything what you would actually wish for. A great movie to watch with the whole family and I'm sure even the adults could get into the movie too.

DonFishies Told in a very disjointed style, Shorts tells the tale of a group of children and adults living in the secluded Black Falls community where the popular Black Box all-in-one gadget is created. A rainbow coloured "wishing rock" falls from the sky during a rain storm, and bizarrely imaginative wishes are granted one-by-one for everyone that gets their hands on it. But not all wishes are as good as others.Robert Rodriguez, an all-in-one filmmaker unlike any other, has created another imaginative family film I imagine he is proud of because he can sit and watch it with his children. While the man made his bones on bullet strewn bloody epics like Desperado and Frank Miller's Sin City, he has never been one to shy away from the family genre. But with every entry, the work just continues to become sloppier. Inspired by his children or not, Rodriguez must have known Shorts was a bad idea from the start. But this clearly mattered very little.I am clearly in the wrong demographic to even begin deciphering what works and what does not in Shorts, but the film is a mess from start to finish. Employing a bit of the style of his buddy Quentin Tarantino, Rodriguez fashions the movie to work as smaller, unorganized stories within a grander framework (thus explaining the title of this opus). It is never confusing, but it becomes really annoying listening to the narrator, main character Toby "Toe" Thompson (Jimmy Bennett) tell us he does not remember the way the story goes every time the story jumps back or forward. Even worse is the addition of rewind, fast forward, and pause buttons that keep appearing during the film. Sure it is quirky and amusing the first time it shows up, but it just becomes bothersome and irritating as the film goes on. It really makes no sense why it is not told in any chronological order and just seems like Rodriguez mixed it up just to make the film a bit more interesting than it actually is.The film's storyline, as simplistic as it is, really offers nothing new to the family genre. Inherent issues about crumbling family units, making friends, and just genuinely finding your place in the world have all been done to death, as have stories about people wishing for things. And while some of the issues do succeed in being imaginative and unique, the stereotypical family film issues are anything but. Rodriguez throws them all into the film (and even a minor subplot about small green aliens) with a no-holds barred attitude dictated by a man who could care less what people think. And when the film reaches its credits, it really feels like all he did was throw ideas at the wall and went with the ones that stuck.As said, the imaginative wishes provided throughout the film by every character are what make the film. A booger monster, walking crocodiles and a baby who can speak to other through her mind are just the start of what you can expect to see during Shorts. And as the film goes on, the ideas just become sillier and more creative as they go along. But sadly, they do not appear all appear to be coming from the mind of Rodriguez. And that is where the film hits another bad turn: the special effects that create these wishes leaves a lot to be desired. Almost every single one looks freakishly amateur and unpolished. I know Rodriguez does a lot of the work himself, but after watching something as digital and special effects friendly as Frank Miller's Sin City, and how realistic that looks, it is a bit sad to look at this mess of a film as being from the same film-making group. It just feels all too disappointing, and like it was just pumped out too quickly before it was really perfected.The acting, much like the rest of the film, is not all that great. Bennett is amusing in the lead role, giving everything he can as a child actor. Yet it does not seem like he was provided much to do outside of what the script asks for. He has a much stronger presence as a supporting character in Orphan, and was better even in his minuscule role as Young Kirk in the recent Star Trek reimagining. I was much more impressed with newcomer Jolie Vanier as the villainess Helvetica. She appears to have really dug into her bad girl role, and is given ample opportunity to make something of the role. And in a movie like this, that is never really all too hard. Adult actors like Kat Dennings, William H. Macy, Jon Cryer, Leslie Mann and James Spader are all given a fair amount to do, but never really seem to give it their all. They just seem to be going through the motions, acting as ridiculous and goofy as they need to, and not doing much else.I started writing this review a few weeks ago after seeing the film, but forgot about finishing it. After watching the movie, it feels like Rodriguez acted the same way when he was writing and putting the film together. There are a few shells of interesting ideas that are on display at various points throughout the film, but they are never fully realized. I can really appreciate the family aspect of the production, and how much of a one-man team Rodriguez is. But this is just not a great film. It has imagination, but it lacks the ability to really stretch and mold it into something worthwhile. It easily could have been made into a stronger film if anyone on the team really put some effort into it. As it is, the newcomer Vanier is the only real reason to even attempt to sit through it.3/10.(Portions of this review originally appeared on http://www.dvdfanatic.com).