vengeance20
Just when you think the Child's Play franchise couldn't get any worse, it does! With this 5th installment in the now ever disappointing franchise, you can hope for worse if not flatness to come!This installment explores the son of the killer doll, but not in the way you'd think. Bride of Chucky was one thing but this... wow... took the cake! Flat out terrible! All the seriousness & dark twisted humour, not to mention basic serious story-line of the first 3 films that everyone knows & loves has gone right down the crapper! Whatever last ounce was seen in Bride of Chucky is completely gone here!The story-line was dumb & completely ludicrous! The deaths (although gory) were dumb & laced with twice as more humour as the previous film! Not to mention the film felt campy & just completely lost in the post Child's Play universe! This film is definitely the worst in the franchise hands down!The humour is wasted in this as a Child's Play sequel & really makes you question if you even are watching a Child's Play film let alone a horror film in general! It's seriously pathetic & I really don't know where to start! Utterly Terrible! 2/10
Eric Stevenson
As another film in this seemingly never ending series just like every other slasher movie, it's hard to judge. The main fault is that a lot of this film just doesn't make any sense. It's hard to tell if there are scenes that are meant to be genuinely heartwarming, funny or scary. The movie's plot is that the baby seen at the ending of "Bride Of Chucky" named Glen is now older and became someone's ventriloquist dummy. He leaves his master to find his parents, Chucky and Tiffany and they just literally never talk about the ventriloquist for the rest of the movie. They never even say how Glen was able to get over the Atlantic Ocean!He uses voodoo to resurrect them and they try to get new bodies again. The weirdest thing is that Glen has some split personality and the movie ends by revealing that Tiffany was able to split his soul into two twin bodies or something? Oh, and she kills someone at the end even though she just said she was going to stop killing? I admit that it's at least unpredictable and I'm surprised it has the lowest score here of any of these movies. I will admit I love the scene where Chucky says he's fed up with trying to transfer his soul and is better off being a killer doll. It's mostly bad but isn't among the worst in the series. **
SnoopyStyle
The child of Chucky and Tiffany has been used to perform for ventriloquist Shitface as Psychs in England. It is haunted by murders and has become a pacifist. It escapes from Shitface and heads to Hollywood to find its parents. Chucky and Tiffany are being used as props for a movie with Jennifer Tilly. She is desperate to be in Redman's next movie and is willing to do anything. Chucky and Tiffany is reanimated and reunited with their child Glen/Glenda. To Glen/Glenda's horrors, they have a disturbing plan to procreate. Joan (Hannah Spearritt) is Tilly's assistant. Pete Peters (John Waters) is a spying paparazzi.There are some hilarious stuff going on but there are also some very twisted disturbing stuff too. I do love the comedy but the disturbing story is very uncomfortable. It's not horrifying as much as awkward. First off, Glen/Glenda is creepy as hell. Chucky has a cuteness to his design but that's not close for the androgynous Glen/Glenda. Pulling down the pants is hilarious but the face is disturbing. I get the sense that this franchise is going experimental to see who is willing to follow it. I'm maybe half in. I can't condone where this is going. The franchise is going off in weird directions that may be story dead ends.
Paul Magne Haakonsen
"Seed of Chucky" isn't the strongest of the movies in the "Child's Play" franchise. Why? Well, because they tried a bit too hard to incorporate way too much comedy. Don't get me wrong here, it is still an adequate movie, and the other "Child's Play" movies also do have elements of humor in them, but it was just a bit too much in "Seed of Chucky".As for the story in "Seed of Chucky", well I will say that it overall felt like the soup was a bit too thin, and they should have stopped the franchise a while back.The acting in the movie was good, though, as it has been in the many previous "Child's Play" movies too. But there is no doubt about the fact that it was Brad Dourif and Jennifer Tilly who carried the movie all the way.Director Don Mancini had cut down on killings in "Seed of Chucky" compared to the previous movies, and instead putting most of the focus on the dysfunctional relationship between Chucky, Tiffany and their odd son Glenn.While it is still an entertaining movie, it was just lacking the elements of the early years in the franchise, and you can say that "Seed of Chucky" sort of is a light variant of the "Child's Play" movies. As such, I am rating it a mediocre five out of ten stars.