paulclaassen Although not a favorite or a classic, the film was (much) better than I expected it to be. (It certainly was a hell of a lot better than that awful '2012'!! The visuals are absolutely incredible, so if this was the only thing you wanted to see in a disaster movie, you've come to the right place. Planning and making this film must have been a huge undertaking. The film suffers from the same cliches as most disaster films do, though, where a failed marriage is saved by disaster. Enough already, Hollywood, find other ways to cause conflict between the protagonists.I thought Alexandra Daddario was particularly good (in the role of Blake Gaines). With a little more film experience I think she should be opted as the new Lara Croft. On the other hand, Ioan Gruffudd was terrible! (but maybe only because his character was such a jerk!).In general, the film was exciting and entertaining, and I'll say it again: the visuals were simply AMAZING!

Michael Ledo PLOT SPOILER REVIEW???Ray (Dwayne Johnson) is ex-military working for LA Fire and Rescue. In the opening scene, God rightly attempts to kill the world's most distracted driver, and Ray foils the plan with a helicopter that has its own swagger music. In a subplot that never connects, Paul Giamatti plays Professor Hayes at Cal Tech who predicts the big one, i.e what happens in Vegas, happens in LA.The basic plot is the same as an Asylum disaster movie plot. A great disaster happens, and the film concentrates on one typical 2.3 child family trying to come together. In this case substitute a new male friend and his brother for 1.3 kids. The main difference is that Ray is separated from his wife (Carla Gugino) who is going to live with her new boyfriend Daniel (Ioan Gruffudd) and his daughter Blake (Alexandra Daddario). Yes I had "Taken" plot flashbacks and wondered if they were going to include Albanians. Liam Neeson would have stopped the looters.As far as the plot, I really don't have to say anything more. Unless you are younger than the film rating, you will have the whole thing figured out in the first 10 minutes. Even the action within the scenes are predictable, like the Hoover dam scene hand off.The soundtrack was typical. What separated this from an Asylum flick was the special effects, actors, and lack of insignia gaffs.If you want on overly predictable action/disaster film, this is it.Guide: 1-2 F-bombs. No sex or nudity.

shakercoola It's entertaining and there is good spectacle but there are far too many miraculous escapes and a far-fetched premise from overexplanation. Any tension achieved crumbles with too many collapsing buildings. The Brits are made predictably weak and overly wholesome to accentuate American heroics.

svr-2200 San Andreas: Movie Review.San Andreas is an okay film with some spectacular stunning visuals and effects and an amazing 3D, and entertaining performance by Dwayne Johnson.San Andreas has some epic disaster action visuals and visual style but offers nothing more than that. Dwayne Johnson delivers an enjoyable performance but seems and feel very underutilized at certain times. The rest of the cast and characters feels very underdeveloped. The movie also has some very unnecessary, boring and irritating characters that are totally useless in the film. San Andreas has many flaws and issues. The movie falls back in the terms of story plot, script and character development and lack of script originality in a disaster movie. And some times too much over use CGI effects in the movie makes it little bit of less interesting.(Please Note: That This Review represent only my professional point of view and my personal honest opinion about the film, and does not represent others. Thank You).