Rodrigo Amaro "Rodrigo D: No Futuro" is one of those films that doesn't necessarily aspire to be one of the greatest films you've ever seen but it has that one special quality that endures and stays with you after seeing it. I've seen several films through the years, dealing with many realities and outcomes, and lately was avoiding similar topics dealing with poverty, crime, harsh realities due to the fact you'll always get the same scenario of despair, brutal murders and stuff. To me, that trend was tiring already and wasn't adding much to me. This film, however, made an impact with me. Having never seen a film from Colombia, this was my first experience, it left me very impressed and hooked through the whole thing, and I was able to take a different perspective on things, examine how similar Brazil and Colombia were and are even today. I couldn't stop thinking about it and that's the kind of effect you expect from movies, specially from ones you expect more of the same. Víctor Gaviria's first feature film revolves around the title character (nicely played by then newcomer Ramiro Meneses), a teenage boy who dreams of forming a punk rock band. Problem is: this is 1988, he lives in the Medellín slums and there's no other interesting alternative for anyone except to join the crime world. Maybe that's not entirely accurate because Rodrigo gets offered some job by his father but he doesn't go. He prefers to stick with his loyal mates, all of them who are into punk music, play some music here and there but mostly focus in stealing motorcycles, cars and consuming drugs. In between crimes and music, Rodrigo and his friends go through life just finding ways to get easy money and escape from authorities, always having to find different hideaways. Here's a film that presents life as it is. Far from giving us a character who faces obstacles to fulfill a dream and building up to something, the story focus more about his reality, the environment surrounding him and how the choices for a life change are so narrow yet so invisible to Rodrigo and his mates. But since they're limited to a place that only presents them the bad side of everything they make the best they can with that: if not usually robbing innocent people, they're teasing each other or making poor music performances...but it's the best they got. My favorite scene from the picture is in fact one of those "poor" performances. After a lousy audition from some punks, Rodrigo and one friend decide to make a small jam session: Rodrigo in the drums and vocals and his mate playing the guitar, singing some bits. That was the highest point of the film in terms of seeing, without any other kind of explanation or a line of dialogue, why music is so important to them. The sense of liberty, release and complete abandon of all society rules, for that brief moment is what brings the characters closer to the dream or at least to some new reality that makes it worth living. That's what punk rock is all about besides the rebellion; in fact, those characters have a lot more to rebel against society than the actual punk creators.Gaviria's film is a near-perfect film - sure, there's some errors at times, characters that come and go and we don't know exactly who they are. But I believe he made a movie that echoed life with its uncertainties, problems, conflicts and misery. The closing credits is a depressive statement on that, when he dedicates the film to four actors who were murdered in between the film's making and its release, all of them dead before reaching their 20's. That's the fact that actually got me the most, remembering everything those characters went through, their stories and friendship and then...life's thrown back at you in such a devastating way, a statement that defines the picture almost in a hopeless way. But not completely. As evidenced by the prominent soundtrack, the film features music from many Colombian punk rock bands (the main theme "Dinero" is unforgettable). So, even in that unending state of despair there was some way out. And that's what Rodrigo believes. A way to leave the crime/drugs world behind and also the talks of his family thinking he's no good.Besides having a title character with the same name as me, another thing that hooked me (later on as I discovered) is the film's full title. Due to proximity of languages, I've always interpreted "No Futuro" as if being "Rodrigo D: In the Future". But looking out for the English version I came to realize that it's actually "No Future", which seems more appropriate due to the nature of the film and the punk aspects (Sex Pistols, baby). But with this title play or lack of translation here, it made me appreciate it even more because for one particular moment you can imagine what's the road Rodrigo will travel in and what possible outcome audiences will like to see it happening. 9/10

david1765 Rodrigo D is not the best film ever made, it even has some glitches and in the version that I watched a character gets murdered in two different scenes (a confusing screw up). But this is what makes the film so authentic, the actors are natural residents of the slums basically acting themselves, and in reality many die before the movie is even featured. The slums are just a labyrinth of houses made from whatever material, and people just seem to walk from the steps to the roofs thanks to its disorganized assembly. Many of the rooftops are bare; this was to continue building in the future and rent the subsequent floors, but most roofs remained bare for the coming years. Pure authenticity portraying the internal feelings most higher classes and foreigners take for cold blooded assassins.If you are having a hard time understanding the scenes, or are looking for the movie online to watch with English subtitles, there's a good article post on Hubpages with the entire movie explained in English. Its called: "Rodrigo D No Futuro Complete Movie Online and Critic Review (with English subtitles)"

Falconeer There is no linear story to be found in this documentary style film from director Victor Gaviria, so fans of typical mainstream style films probably will not like this, very important film. "Rodrigo D. No Futuro" is basically a glimpse into the lives of a group of Medellin teenagers, living a pointless existence. With no opportunity for work, or escape, they spend their days hanging out in the streets, drinking, and sometimes robbing people who they see as being in a better position than themselves. Never having money unless they rob someone or sell some stolen goods, they have nothing, and nothing to lose. Rodrigo, according to his sister, is a bum, with no ambition, and no purpose in life. This is not really true, as he does have one dream, and that is to start a punk band. To do this, he needs a set of drums. Rodrigo is a likable character, and we want this guy to somehow realize his dream, to get his drums, to form the band, and to possibly find the way out of a bleak situation. But as the film goes on, we see that this will not be, for any of the young people in this place. As far as a story goes, that is pretty much it. The director, rather than casting professional actors, instead used real teenagers, from the barrio in which this is filmed. Of all the kids featured here, only the main actor, Ramiro Meneses continued to make films after this one. Four of the others died shortly after completion, murdered some say, because of their involvement with this film. I believe that fact makes this movie all the more important, as these guys should not be forgotten, and their stories and lives should reach the attention of as many people as possible. Everyone turns in great and powerful performances. There are scenes of the kids interacting with their families and friends, and although they have so little in the way of material things, they do seem to have some feeling of family in their community, as everyone lives so close to each other. The landscape of the environment is that of a brutal, treeless urban desert, with the hot Colombian sun forever beating down, adding to the general feeling of hopelessness that this film has. There are no artistic camera angles, no scenes of typical artistic merit, and I believe this to be intentional. The tone and style simply reflects the lives of these teenagers. Some complain that it is unfocused, and that nothing happens in the course of it's 90 minute running time. But that is the point, to show lives with no focus or direction, or future. Rodrigo D. has a small cult following among punk rockers, and for good reason. There is some good street punk music throughout the movie, and the main characters are punks, listening to and wearing t-shirts of bands like Sex Pistols and Exploited. And there are so many great scenes, like the band rehearsal in the hills, and 'Little John's' funeral, and the scenes of Rodrigo arguing with his sister, or his dad, who is forever trying to talk some sense into his rebellious son. And Rodrigo is forever banging his drumsticks on walls, and everywhere else, always trying to get those drums. But he never does, there is no happy ending. I recommend this film to people who are interested in looking beyond their own lives and worlds, to see other cultures, and to understand their struggles and dreams. Unfortunately this is a hard title to find, but if you get the chance, see this special film.

cocoshell After a long and, I have to admit, exhausting pursuit I finally laid my hands on a bad VHS copy of this old Colombian film about troubled teenage boys on the streets of Medellin slums. Highly recommended by quite a few people with similar taste in movies as mine, I was expecting a hidden gem, an accurate representation of everyday issues of youth life in a third world country's poor neighborhoods. Gee, what a shock it was to see this film has none of what I hoped to find in it. The title implies it should be about a certain Rodrigo, teenage school drop out growing up in a shanty town of Medellin with nothing but crime and aimlessness all around him, finding his only release in a dream of being a drummer in a punk rock band. If the director decided to follow Rodrigo's story, with an emphasis on his broken home and the reasons why he does ( or doesn't ) the things he does maybe the final result would've been at least an average motion picture. But instead of concentrating on Rodrigo's story and the gradual unfold toward his tragic ending, director Victor Gaviria goes with a stack of more or less uninteresting characters, grinding the storyline into incoherent pieces with no practical value for the viewer. I say uninteresting characters because we get to know absolutely nothing about them. Where do those kids come from? Where are their families? How in the world are they surviving? What is the reason for their apathy towards the world? The vague clues to those questions are placed here and there in course of the movie but they surely don't clarify the path those youths decided to take. Gaviria's piece has a lack of fundamental part in storytelling : humane characters. No matter of their nature, one as a viewer has to be able to understand their motivations, open the door into their lives to be able to comprehend it. You will get nothing of that in "Rodrigo D-No Futuro". The script is not in place either as I was struggling to keep my concentration until the very end. I have nothing against slow plots if they serve the purpose but this just drags on forever and one gets a feeling of pressing the eject button and throwing away this whole nonsense. From the 10th minute until approximately 85th you know nothing more than you did at the initial point. Just a perpetual motion on bunch of kids loafing around, wasting time, stealing vehicles, drinking, smoking pot..and listening to some really amateur, awful punk rock. What surprises me about "Rodrigo S" is a fact that supposedly it has a small, but devoted following among punk rockers and it doesn't even do the iconographic part of the job right. Since when do punk rockers wear t-shirts with swastikas?? I always thought punk rock movement is rigidly anti Nazism and I know for a fact that just a small outcast group of punk rockers( called skinheads ) embraced Hitler's ideology of hate. I don't know, maybe at the time when the film was made it was different in Colombia than here in the Western civilization. As I stated earlier, the characters are dispersed between limited screen time and therefore completely uninteresting since this should be a story about human lives, not a Steven Seagal flick where rationale does not matter. When the fateful events occur at the end of the movie you don't know what's going on nor why it happened. I've seen more than a few Latin American films that deal with the similar subject in a superior way ( Cidade de Deus, Pixote, 1st story of Amores Perros, Bus 174 ).... Gaviria's grave mistake with "Rodrigo" is not knowing what he wants the film to be : a pseudo-documentary with no content or a movie with documentary feel and no storyline??!! Whatever he had in mind did not work for me as I felt betrayed instead of touched as I should be. If you still want to see it go ahead but don't expect poignancy as you will not get it. "Rodrigo" could've been a much better movie if placed in the hands of a director with a vision, sensibility and dexterity of telling a story about unfortunate kids trying to swim in a hollow pool of nothingness...Not recommended ( 4/10 )