JLRMovieReviews Patricia Neal is a blind married woman, who's a victim of hysterical blindness, a term for blindness that is caused by psychological reasons, instead of anything really wrong with the eyes. It seems she was traumatized by something and refused to see things the way they really were. By way of how she relates to sister Samantha Eggar and husband Curt Jurgens, we enter her world. I read one review of this movie that called it turgid. I was never sure what turgid meant. And. sometimes the dictionary only tells you a synonym type of definition, with not enough of an explanation. But if turgid means to tell a story with exaggeration instead of subtlety. Then, I would agree to an extent, but I think this type of film, the story itself, the mood and setting, and its way of telling the story all go well together, up to a point. Things certainly get worse, before they get better. But I liked Ms. Neal's performance (as usual) and I particularly liked the ending, instead of getting a startling and shocking climax which the film feels like it's heading for. It may not be much on the whole, but I would watch this over and the family dynamic and dysfunction only adds to its appeal as a curiosity piece for the Patricia Neal fans.

sol ***SPOILER*** Slow moving and at times boring psychological drama that has nothing at all to do with the movie "Psycho" which by its title-Psyche 59-it can easily be mistaking for.Alison Crawford, Patricia Neal, has been blind for five years since on that fatefully summer day in 1959-the year that the movie's title indicates-when she feel down a flight of stairs at Grandma's, Beatrix Lehmann, place in the country and ended up losing her sight. Told by her doctors that there's nothing wrong with her eyes in them being perfectly normal it's obviously that Alsion's loss of sight has to do with her mind not wanting to see whatever she sees! That has to do with what Alison saw just before she fell and lost her sight five years ago! What she saw was so shocking that she not only forget what she saw but never wants, psychologically, to see again! See!Married to successful businessman Eric Crawford, Curt Jurgens, Alison has settled into the life of a sightless person not really that interested in whats going on in the world until her kid sister-13 years her junior- Robin, Samanta Eggar, shows up at the Crawford's elegant flat in downtown London for a visit. Even though Alsion can't we could see that Robin and Eric have been lovers for some time in how they interact with each other during their time together at the Crawford flat. In fact Eric's good friend Paul, Ian Bannen, who's really got the hots for Robin and wants to marry her is rebuffed every time he tries to get It on with her in favor of Robin being "lovey Davy" with Eric!Eric for his part is very uncomfortable with Robin being around the house in the unwanted advances she make at him with his wife Alision, Robin's sister, totally unaware of what happening between the two. It's when Eric and Robin together with Paul and the Crawford kids Jean & Susan, Shelley Crowhurst & Sandra Leo, go visit Grandma's country home that the shocking truth in what caused Alisons blindness comes dramatically to the surface! In her almost ending up with a brain concussion when she was hit by a runaway horse, that Robin was riding, in the garden.***SPOILERS*** The big and shocking surprise ending in the film "Psyche 59" was so obvious that it shocked practically no one not even those in the films cast. The fact that anybody could see whats was going on between Eric & Robin with the exception of the blind Alison made the surprise ending a no brainier! By far the biggest and only surprise in the film was how Eric reacted, is wife's revelation about him and Robin, to it that totally psyched me out!

Poseidon-3 Made at a time when psychological dramas were enjoying popularity and at a stage when what could be depicted on screen was being tested with each new film, this movie showcases the talents of its star trio fairly well. Neal plays a blind woman, married to Jurgens, who is blind not because of any substantial injury or illness, per se, but because she has suffered some sufficient mental trauma to render her sightless – hysterical blindness. Her husband dotes on her while simultaneously seeming to resent her. Things get even stickier when Neal invites her baby sister Eggar back home to live with them. Eggar dates family friend Bannen, who already has a flirtatious rapport with Neal, while Jurgens struggles with an attraction to Eggar. Eggar, an unbelievably brazen and selfish person, leads him on deliberately, sometimes right under the nose of her sight-impaired sister. When Neal and Eggar head out to the country to visit grandmother March, with the gentlemen soon joining them, things take on a more upsetting tone, culminating in yet another traumatic series of events which call Neal's vision into question again. Neal, fresh off an Oscar win for "Hud," is captivating to watch here and retains most of the film's focus. Jurgens, although top-billed, is somewhat less central though he does an excellent job. His steely eyes are well-served by the stark black and white cinematography (which is wonderful throughout.) Eggar is impossibly young and delectable. She shows off an array of 60s fashions and hairstyles, but also gives a strong performance in a role that could have been played very one-dimensionally. Bannen is likable and solid in his less-than-magnetic character. He has the bad luck to be in love with a vixen. March portrays with some degree of restraint the highly atypical grandmother who seems almost devoid of affection and doesn't hand out praise easily. This type of film will not appeal to all viewers as it is at times heavy-handed and strains to be artsy. However, for those willing to take it in, it's a very interesting and engrossing piece. Certainly, the work of the three leads is very strong. In the second half, the focus gets blurry, the pace begins to drag and the motivations of the characters get a bit cloudy, but there are some great moments of tension and anxiety on display. A heavily dramatic score by Kenneth Jones punctuates the opening credits and the emotional scenes. Fans of the leads really can't afford to miss out on it.

numberone_1 This film came on Turner Classic Movies recently, with the host mentioning that it was the film's debut on that channel, and the first film Patricia Neal made after winning the Oscar for Hud.The story concerns a privileged upper-class blind woman named Alison (Neal), her husband Eric (Jurgens) and her younger sister, Robin (Eggar). At first all seems perfectly OK, given the circumstances, but bits of conversation are dropped here and there, darting looks are thrown here and there, and soon we realize that there is something lurking beneath the veneer of a privileged life. Alison, in the final stages of her second pregnancy, suffered a fall in her home that rendered her blind, though as she states early on, it's not that her corneas don't function, it's that her brain won't permit her to see images (paraphrasing here). Apparently this happened in 1959, hence the "'59" in the title: The story then takes place in 1964, five years after this fact, over a time period that seems to be about a month, or maybe two, when Robin re-arrives back into the lives of Eric and Alison after what appears to be a 5-year absence.The black-and-white cinematography adds much to this film, such that I believe if it were in color, it would not be as effective. The language, dialogue and subject matter covered was ahead of its time, at least by U.S. standards, but stylistically, this matches a number of thrillers and socially-conscious dramas that came out of England in the early- to mid-1960s (e.g., Victim, Pumpkin Eater, etc.).The first part of the film, set in London, sets up the story beautifully, and it isn't long before we start to realize that something's "up" - the carefully-worded dialogue, with certain key words and phrases omitted, or the glances of the blind Alison behind her sunglasses, to the beat of her words...you see that all that glitters is not gold, so to speak.The second part of the film takes place at the characters' country house, located near a coastline; It is here that the set-up for what could be a riveting tale, as depicted in the first part of the film, loses steam and slows to a crawl, such that the conclusion is neither climactic nor satisfying; this is a shame, because it could have been done much better. Besides that, I do agree with the comments made by a previous observer, including that the grandmother doesn't seem quite grandmotherly (and actually, I'm sort of confused as to why this character is even in the picture).Nonetheless, the acting is superb by all the leads, and particularly by Neal, who carries the film, in my opinion. Pay attention to every movement she makes, whether it's with her eyes, her head or her hands; listen intently to every syllable she utters, for it is through her character that we understand the real story of what has happened, or is happening, to these three people.The movie is based on a book by the same name by Francoise des Ligneris, which is available online.