MJB784 The visuals looked incredibly fake and ugly looking. It was easy to tell what was computer animated because there was way too much fast forward movement that didn't blend very well. Neverland looked really dirty. The colors in Neverland were ugly shades of red, purple, blue and the locations in Neverland looked like sets. I don't know if Hook was better or not. If you want to watch Peter Pan, stick with the Disney cartoon. Also, the crocodile has more realism. Watching the characters fly across obvious green screen doesn't seem real.

pronetomovies I've grew up watching this film and watching it again just gives me so much emotions, it brings back my childhood. I didn't see Peter Pan's point why he didn't want to leave neverland back then because it seems to me that it's sad he doesn't have parents and he just lives alone with a tiny girl called "tinker bell" but now I know exactly why he doesn't want to grow up, I now know why he doesn't want to leave neverland because if I was him I would probably do the same. I thought growing up was fun and adventurous, maybe it is in some kind of way but it's still scary. If everyone has a chance to go to neverland I'm pretty sure the world is empty right now like who wants to get old, get wrinkled face and grey hair nowadays, right?

Eddie_weinbauer I re watched this today,after first watching it back in 03 when it came out. My first impression was right.The movie is stinker.Well maybe not if you're a child. The sword fighting is really sub par,but I think that comes from the fact that they didn't have time to rehearse them. If they had time to rehearse properly, I think the sword scenes would have been a lot better to look at. Cause the way they come off in the film,they seem like two actors trying way too hard to make it look real. I think they have spent much of the time, practicing flying instead.Captain hook comes off pretty okay. Not too creepy-scary, just evil- scary.The way kids like it I guess.But still a lot better than Christopher walken did as CAPT.Hook. Wendy plays out okay as the slightly worrying mother figure for the boys,but still clenches on to the child in her self Peter pan looks a bit like a girl. Kind of made me wonder if they were opting for a girl all along,but got turned down by the studio exec somewhere along the road. Personally I fell for tinkerbell's acting. She did an excellent job,and I got the impression she was suppose to be the comic sidekick relief. Her acting was just brilliant and she completely steal the show whenever she was on screen. She manage to be both mischievous,with a hint of evil meanness to her, and funny and likable at the same time.What I felt was wrong though, was the sudden use of narrator midway through the movie.I can accept the use of it in the beginning of a movie,but not when they start reusing it midway.Than it just annoys me

Badauta Starting with the introduction: a night sky, the chime of bells and the first lines of the narration, we meet with a magic creation, full of enchantment and nostalgia. A very thorough production, down to the last detail. Thanks to its imaginative wonderland scenery and its focus on an individual language for every character, this film has created a unique atmosphere. The storyline is witty and thankfully lacks the monotonous pattern of many fairy tale adaptations. Most important, throughout excellent acting – from an utterly convincing Peter Pan, to a refreshingly lifelike Captain Hook, and an admirably selfless Mr Darling – turns this film into an unforgettable experience.