Jackson Booth-Millard I found this Polish film in the 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die book, I read that the director Andrzej Munk was partway through making this film, when he was killed in a car crash, Witold Lesiewicz completed the film with the footage available and imagery. Basically German woman Liza (Aleksandra Slaska) is coming back to Europe on a transatlantic ship, she has recollections from the past come back to she notices and recognises the face of another woman, Marta (Anna Ciepielewska). Liza is married, she explains to her husband that during the Second World War that she been an overseer at Auschwitz concentration camp, but she also says that she has saved the life of Marta, a former inmate at the camp. Also starring Jan Kreczmar as Walter, Irena Malkiewicz as Oberaufseherin Madel, Leon Pietraszkiewicz as Commandant Lagerkommandant Grabner and Janusz Bylczynski as Capo. The film is made up of the remaining footage filmed by the director before his death and still images from the true events, it certainly delivers the message that the Holocaust may belong to history, but it will never be forgotten, the camp sequences are certainly horrific, overall it was an interesting enough incomplete documentary style wartime drama. Worth watching!

Polaris_DiB It is very unfortunate that this movie wasn't finished, but it's also a little bit more unfortunate that people chose to finish it to the extant state it currently holds. Andrzej Munk's bits and pieces about a Nazi Concentration Camp officer and her relationship to a young Jewish woman she seems somewhat obsessed with has some quite obvious power. What he managed to capture before his untimely death is gorgeous moments of uncertainty, uncertainty in the actions, in the motivations, and in the ambiguous acting of the lead character. To be sure, the finished product would have had a lot to say about the strange relationship between life and death the Nazi's had while running the camps.Unfortunately, he died before he finished. So others took on the task of finishing it, filling the holes with sometimes literal voice-over ruminations of what Munk might have intended. So we have the intentional ambiguity of the primary text and the ambiguity of what that "intentional" was, meaning we're basically treated to an incomplete movie that basically begs for us to try to figure out how to complete it ourselves. The problem with that is that we already have that historical narrative with the Holocaust anyway, and the nature of the imagery Munk shot shows that he was leading somewhere significant.For one thing, much of the horrible imagery of the Holocaust, the stuff that's become trope for narratives about it, is kept in the background: the foreground is the face of the actress Alecsandra Slazka, which is achingly compelling and probably the reason why others felt it was necessary to finish the work despite itself. Many of the actions are not actually resolved, and plot holes and gaps that are literally unfilmed parts of the plots and missing imagery leave some unintended ambiguities that simply detract from the main story. It's clear that Munk was going somewhere. This film doesn't take it there. So it's kind of depressing to watch it go nowhere.--PolarisDiB

SomethinglikeSarah What the hell is this? I can appreciate a good avant-garde film but this just takes the mickey. Firstly its only half a film because unfortunately the director died before it was complete, there's hardly any dialogue and it kinda just jumps all over the place. Cinematicly its brilliant but the content isn't so good. I would direct people to 'Fateless' which is a much better independent Hungarian film. Yes I appreciate it was made in the 1960s at a time where there wasn't hardly any films on the subject of the holocaust and in that context then I would say its pretty ground breaking, however, i think audiences are harder to please these days and so you might end up just a little confused wondering why you spent the last hour on this film.Don't bother watching this unless you have no other options. I can't believe i wasted £10 on this.

liehtzu It's difficult to make an accurate assessment of this film because it's incomplete. In fact, it's far from complete. Still, from the pieces of what is left we can see that "Passenger" may well have turned out to be a masterpiece. Like Jean Vigo, Andrzej Munk was considered a cinematic genius who died too soon (in a car crash in 1960). Munk is less well known than Vigo but he is still important, especially in the development of Polish film. "Passenger" is the story of a German woman on a cruise-liner who catches a glimpse of who she believes to be a Jewish girl she was in charge of at a concentration camp during the war. She recounts to her husband in flashback the story of how she tried to protect the girl from her vicious captors. Later on though, in another flashback, we see what really happened: the woman was not the girl's protector, but a sadist who relished her position of authority and her control over the lives of the prisoners she guarded. The cruise-liner scenes are all done using still shots with a narrator (or, the "restorer" of the film) trying to decipher how exactly Munk intended to piece the film together, while the flashback scenes are actual moving images, shot in fine black and white widescreen compositions. As the "narrator" tries to understand the film, what it would have become, so do we as viewers. In this way the film itself becomes perhaps even more labyrinthine than it would have been had Munk completed it, and we have an added level of mystery that is as frustrating as it is exciting. The incomplete film entices us to guess how it would have turned out, and while its certainly not a substitute for the completed film, this fragmented "Passenger" is brilliant and tantalizing nonetheless.