letig1994
This Fellini's movie opens in a white, half-empty room. A kind, old man guides us through the history and the current purpose of the oratory until the musicians arrive. He's nostalgic of the old days of which he often speaks, comparing them to the present decay. The relationship between present and past in music is also evoked by the orchestra leader. The past is always represented as the ideal period opposed to the time infected by media. The television is there to film the orchestra rehearsals: musicians are asked to talk about themselves: it's beautiful how each one of them remembers their encounter with music and the instrument they're playing. The characters are all unique: they have different stories to tell but they share the same passion. Everyone wants to impose the importance of its own instrument without realizing that magic is accomplished with the presence of every single one together. The orchestra leader complains about the public who, in his opinion, is unable to understand music, or art in general. Like T.S. Eliot's line "the women come and go talking of Michelangelo", the orchestra leader expresses his dissatisfaction with the public. The second half of the movie is an act of rebellion where the musicians refuse the orchestra leader's role. The seizure of power doesn't last very long: they end up destroying and ruining the oratory. The orchestra leader takes control of the situation and when everything seems to be back to its own harmony, the sound of disappointment echoes in the dust of the room.The music of the movie is sublime, composed by the incomparable Nino Rota. The acting is simple but pure and it perfectly reaches Fellini's intent.
ElMaruecan82
The poet William Congreve said: "Music has charms to soothe a savage breast" yet according to Woody Allen, listening to Wagner gives him "the urge to invade Poland". I guess the truth about music lies somewhere between these two conflicting interpretations.For some, music is the perfect embodiment of men's capability for abstraction. Whether for love, ideals or faith, it's the only universal language meant to awaken hearts and souls before intellect. And because of its so high and noble purpose, music can also be a devil's tool and inspire the most aggressive and vindictive reactions. It's a double edged-sword, maybe the most dangerous form of artistic expression precisely because anyone provides his own meaning.The great achievement of "Orchestra Rehearsal" is to offer us, for the first and only time, the opportunity to understand the value of an instrument from the intimate and privileged perspective of the player. The film has such an immense pedagogical value that I recommend it to any music teacher, for its magnificent illustration of the variety of instruments that enrich the world of music. Each instrument has a personality eagerly embraced by the player, as if man became the obedient tool of a greater instance. Fellini makes it so obvious that the characters should be, in fact, defined by the name of their instrument.Violins, first, are arrogant because they're the first and longest-running players; oboes hate them because they play a greater role but they don't get the same recognition. Free-spirited and youthful percussions are naturally bored by their colleagues' pompousness; harp is elegant, sweet and introverted. Tuba has low self-esteem. What else? Piano is classy and very seductive, clarinets are solemn, flute is lively and eccentric. And so on and so forth, listening to each player speaking of his instrument and acting according to it, is of the film's greatest delights.Yet variety is worthless when not tending toward complementarity. The project of the orchestra is the same of any other society: to make people coexist in harmony, literally this time. Only harmony will allow all these personalities to express themselves as an ensemble, many egos for one expression that will touch our individual hearts. That's what orchestras are for, and this is why they need a conductor, like a society needs a leader to maintain order, not the easiest task in "Orchestra Rehearsal".The musicians all meet in a dirty and creepy crypt-like place in the middle of the town. Although the sanctuary is dedicated to music and only music, fact is that these musicians brought the town in it, and are far from the devoted or disciplined artists we used to see. The reasons they don't get along with each other exceed their instruments' "rivalry": they're of different generations, men and women, old-fashioned professionals, young long-haired leftists, geeky losers; idealistic dreamers and disillusioned pragmatists who think more in terms of syndicate hours. What a gallery! What more to ignite their hatred, the place is filthy, a rat can play the uninvited guest, the German conductor is difficult to work with, and there's hardly a place to sit and focus on the partitions without smelling the neighbor's bad breathe or touching his elbow. The film, set in real time, borrows some elements from Sidney Lumet's "12 Angry Men" through its parallel between a claustrophobic setting and pressure, inevitably leading us to an explosion of emotions, given that they're more than 12, and they're too unfocused to get back to the only thing that puts them on the same wavelength: music.And to make things worse, there is TV. The film, shot like a TV documentary, highlights TV's effect on people in general. Instead of focusing on music, their ego is suddenly awakened by that camera's eye staring at them and inviting them to express freely while there's no freedom in classical music. And as required discipline progressively fades out, aggravated by the conductor's exuberance, the musicians start to wonder what can of values music should express and decide to rebel against harmony's diktat.The film was said to be inspired by the anarchist movements in post-60's Italy, but there's more to it in my opinion. Music is depicted as a fascinating paradox. It's a discipline that demands patience and dedication, that can't do without the admiration of a mentor, and long hours of pain, works, mistakes and humiliations, with a divine result as a pay-off. In one of the film's most thrilling moment, the musicians seem to be touched by the divine grace, and play a magnificent piece named "Galop" and the tune celebrated 'freedom', 'anger' and 'excitement' more eloquently that any political slogans.Music can express freedom but is not a free expression for all that. Cinema is. And maybe this is why Fellini admitted some defiance toward music, too restrictive an art. Yet his "Orchestra Rehearsal" is perhaps the greatest celebration of music ever done in film. And Fellini's owes a lot to his all-time companion Nino Rota, for having musically elevated films like "La Strada" or "8½" to their legendary status. This tribute to music was long overdue for Rota and any other composers, and Fellini and Rota couldn't have a greater last collaboration (one year before Rota's death) and this is why any Fellini fan can have a soft spot for 'Orchestra Rehearsal".The ending can be regarded as a triumph of music. After the chaos resulting from the rebellion, fueled from a 'urban' thirst for anarchy, the entrance of a bulldozer nearly destroying the crypt reminded the musicians of the city's alienation they all escape from when they play music. The antagonist in the film might not be the conductor, but town and TV, the greatest catalysis of individualism, disorder and resentment, what precisely goes against music's values.François Truffaut said "I demand that a film express either the joy or the agony of making cinema." Replace 'Cinema' by 'Music' and you have "Orchestra Rehearsal"
Ymir4
This is likely the finest make-believe documentary that I have ever seen. The setting is a rundown Medieval Roman chapel, now an oratorio where an orchestra gathers. A television crew is making a documentary about this orchestra (while the orchestra is dealing with a union dispute). The bulk of the film's first half focuses on individual musicians, many of whom reminisce about their first encounter with the instrument they play. When the musicians talk about their instrument, they often share thoughtful and stimulating metaphors about the meaning and the function of their instrument. There are a few times during the film where the action is interrupted by a large rumble in the building. We don't know what this is exactly until the end of the film. The film transforms from poetic, to pure comical delight, to complete chaos, to lyrical beauty when the musicians play the music. Composer Nino Rota's contribution was an immense one. He composed all of the pieces the musicians play in the film, and I believe they the music is absolutely wonderful (my personal favorite of Rota's compositions for "Orchestra Rehearsal" being the final piece the orchestra performs). This was the last time Rota scored a Fellini film, he died the next year.I also must comment on the top-notch cinematography, which is quintessentially Felliniesque (ex. incredible long shots of the orchestra playing, shots of musicians lined up in very particular angles, and a couple of sweeping pans). Anybody who loves orchestral music will like this film to some degree. I happen to immensely love Fellini, Rota, AND orchestral music, so for me, this film is nothing short of absolutely marvelous entertainment!
Marat Parkhomovsky
Fellini's "Prova d'orchestra" was originally made for television, and there it should have stayed. As a cinematic event, it does not deliver. Yes, it's well directed and nicely acted, it has an interesting idea in it, but it's not enough for me to enjoy it. Eventually it looks like an exercise by some cinema student and not like a piece by Fellini, one of a few cinema genius of our time. I was disappointed, even though I enjoyed parts of it. My Grade: *** (out of *****)