clareizaguirre Can Seth Rogan be a in a film without it involving pot? Is it in his contract or something? My partner loves him and all of his films. I don't. Because I am more into films we usually watch films I want to see, so something has to give. That means watching all three Bad Neighbor films. TBH I can't even remember the first two other than being scarred from the sex scenes between Rose Burns and Seth Rogan. And actually, maybe this is only the second? I don't know and I don't care and I'm not going to find out.The all-male writers obviously thought they had stumbled on revolutionary territory over the revelation that sororities can't have parties. Cue the rebellious Chloe Moretz (who by the way in this is cool, I liked her) setting up her own with two suddenly best friends. Of course it is in the old house where all the Frat problems of Rose Burn and Seth Rogan's characters first began. The girls meet Zac Effron, the man child with issues that force him to run around the neighbourhood without any shoes on. He is however as great as he possibly can be with his performance considering how basic his character is. Anyway it's another all out battle between houses as Rose and Seth want to sell their house blah blah with Zac needing to chose a side- his forever peter pan young side or his old past college side.Just one of those extra films that gets made to make money at the box office. Doesn't matter how bad the first, second or third films are if they do well in the box office expect more of them. Inane? Yep. But everyone keeps watching! This film obviously heavily involves pot smoking and how cool smoking is. I don't care about smoking but I am starting to think that Americans do it all the time and seem to think it's as rebellious and serious as getting out the old heroin syringe. So yeah, I can't really be bothered to summarise.

vleelaurie Purile trash. I'd rather go to the dentist. How do people get the money to make this crap?

Howlin Wolf Pretty obvious idea for a sequel... It seems like it's going in an interesting and potentially amusingly fertile direction at first - looking at how the different sexes are treated in their quests to have fun... but soon, it drops that angle, and just has the girls behave in the exact same way as the guys...Don't get me wrong, I fully support women getting to do the same things as men (drinking, swearing, lots of sex, etc) with the same absence of judgement... but they need to have a different approach to it, otherwise there's no point in swapping the genders, at all.Something like "Trainwreck" succeeded where the likes of this and "Bridesmaids" stumbled, in my opinion - by managing to provide a uniquely feminine perspective on bad behaviour, and yet still being funny.

Ateto van Dutch I have never imagined that the first review that I will write will be on a "movie" that I totally dislike. No plot whatsoever. If you consider that the first part of this disaster had plot, this one ruined it. Hopefully if you watched the first movie you will know who is who. This starts from nowhere and does not get anywhere. I am not a comedy watcher, but I've seen my fair share. This "movie" made me hate and laugh at all those "feminist, SJW, snowflakes etc" even more. The propaganda is really really strong in this one. Don't bother watching it. Trying to be something a comedy is not supposed to be. Generic humor, boring characters, points made on things that nobody takes seriously.