Needful Things

1993 "Buy Now. Pay Later."
6.3| 2h0m| R| en| More Info
Released: 27 August 1993 Released
Producted By: New Line Cinema
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A mysterious new shop opens in a small town which always seems to stock the deepest desires of each shopper, with a price far heavier than expected.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

New Line Cinema

Trailers & Images

Reviews

dannydenshaw Needful Things isn't one of Stephen Kings better novels; it's overblown and leans heavily on gory horror and satanic menace rather than the compelling psychological tension that characterises his later work. The book's saving grace for me is the wit and charm of King's narrative style, which is inevitably lost in a screen adaptation.This film pares down the story considerably: not necessarily a bad thing, though it leaves several loose ends for anyone familiar with the novel. Bolstered by strong performances from Ed Harris and Max Von Sydow in the leading roles, the result is a good horror film that's worth a watch, though it's several leagues below the likes of The Shining and The Green Mile.
Coventry Where can you still get some kicks if you have already existed for many centuries and, thanks to your manipulative talents and supernatural evil forces, were involved in – or even directly responsible for - the greatest tragedies and cataclysms of our not-so civilized world's history? Here's an idea; why not install yourself in a remote little New England community, full of naive and easily influential villagers, and gradually cause them to exterminate each other! Meanwhile you just stand at the sideline and observe with a devilish smile on your immortal face! This is exactly Leland Gaunt's intention when his old-timer Mercedes arrives in the sleepy little town of Castle Rock, Maine. In his charming antique store named Needful Things, Gaunt offers a unique item per resident that they either always craved or desperately require, whether it's a rare collector's item baseball card, an authentic 1950's football jacket or a cure to chronicle pain. Leland Gaunt does not ask for a payment, he asks for a favor. And these favors are to bring harm to others, which eventually brings the entire community at a state of war. "Needful Things" is an adaptation of a Stephen King novel and that brings me to repeat my unpopular opinion that he's often a plagiarist… This is at least the third time already that I encounter a movie of which the basic premise looks an awful lot like that of a much older and far more obscure horror gem. King's widely acclaimed novel and movie "Misery" bears a lot of resemblance to a rare 70's exploitation gem entitled "The Strange Vengeance of Rosalie", his mini-series "Storm of the Century" is actually an elaboration of the forgotten 80's low-budget flick "A Day of Judgement" and this "Needful Thing" could pretty much be described as a re-telling of Ray Bradbury's "Something Wicked this Way Comes". The surrounding is different, with an antique store instead of a traveling circus, but the rudimentary plots are exactly alike: how ordinary people are so easily prepared to exchange moral values and sense of civilization in favor of petty desires. Although personified in a mysterious stranger passing through a small village, the real devil is called avarice and selfishness and he homes inside every person. If you watch both movies (or read both novels) back-to-back, it's nearly impossible to deny that Stephen King didn't just borrow Ray Bradbury's bright ideas and altered a few minor details. Of course by this I don't mean to say that "Needful Things" isn't enjoyable. In an overall weak decade for the horror genre in general, this is in fact one of the best efforts, mainly thanks to a terrific ensemble cast and a few ingenious fright-moments. Max Von Sydow depicts a splendid evil caricature and other respectable names like J.T. Walsh, Ed Harris, Don S. Davis and Amanda Plummer go over-the-top exactly the way they should. Admirable direction as well, by Fraser Clarke Heston. Yeah, Charlton's son!
TransAtlantyk I'm not a big Stephen King fan but the premise to this story is just great. It should make for a great film but for some reason the film disappoints. Not terribly but you feel like you should have gotten more.Enter Max von Sydow. The man is an absolute pleasure to watch in any film he is in and no matter how long he appears in a given film it is better for his involvement. Without question one of the world's greatest actors of the twentieth century. This is obviously not his best role but he lends a wonderful Old World charm to this American story, his turn as the shopkeeper saves this movie from being low- quality and brings it up to a decent spooky story.I have heard that the TBS version is much better as it feature more characterization (what I found to be the weakest part of the film) but I have not seen it. If anyone has any idea where to acquire it please leave a comment.
Maz Murdoch (asda-man) "Needful Things" is by no means a bad film, but neither is it an amazing film, it certainly feels like it has a great story (like all Stephen king stories) it's original and engaging, but something is missing and I can sort of put my finger on it.So "Needful things" has a really interesting plot, an old man comes into the town and seems to know everything about everyone (you need to have a really open mind when you find out why!) He sells what people most desire but in return they must do something bad! At first it seems innocent enough, like chucking mud at someones washing, but it quickly turns into something much more sinister and quite cleverly satisfying.Max Von Sydow is also really good as the shopkeeper, he's got a sweet old man exterior but then turns into a completely evil human being! He plays the character memorably and also makes him quite likable, just because of his childish mischief-making.The score is also really good! It's really dramatic and over the top which sets the right tone for the film. Music is used brilliantly and sometimes humorously throughout as well. All in all it is an entertaining film and certainly isn't boring. But then what is wrong? I think the feel of the film isn't quite fitting. It looks like a TV movie and the directing isn't that spectacular enough to live up to the spectacular storyline. The cinematography is also kind of messy. With the right director and perhaps a bigger budget this film could be a memorable classic! Unfortunately it's not and this lets it down big time.Don't avoid this film, if you get the chance to see it then see it! But, prepare yourself for a ridiculous yet entertaining storyline with some decent acting (Max!). But, it might leave you feeling empty and wanting perhaps some meatier directing. Nice idea, not so nice execution.