pudge76-1 I saw this movie because one of the actresses in it was a friend from high school. I was excited to see it for this very reason. I must say I was happy to see her in the movie, but this was an excruciating film to sit through. I felt like the person responsible for this film's creation was simply trying to put out a movie for the sake of putting out a movie. Very poor in just about every aspect I could think of. Boring and mundane. I can't imagine producing something like this. Any credibility I might have had as a film maker would be flushed right down the commode. I can't believe a product like this would even make it to the shelves of a movie store. Honestly, my kids could probably produce something more entertaining with their camcorder. Unbelievably painful to watch. Please watch paint dry. You will feel you spent your time more productively than if you watch this film. I am embarrassed to admit I watched it from beginning to end.

Irigy First of all, the poster to this movie (with the nailed hand) is very misleading, if you want to see the movie because of that - as I did. You most likely will be disappointed, since there's a similar scene in the movie, but it's by no means representative for the movie; don't expect another Saw / Hostel clone.While I liked the basic idea of the movie, the implementation was lacking in all aspects. The acting was (for this kind of B-movie) OK, some more realism in the way the cops handled their guns would have been appreciated, the effects (what little there were) were done acceptably and cutting/camera work was decent (again, you see a lot worse in the category of movies).My main problem with the movie was that there were several scenes that a) didn't make any sense towards getting the movie going or b) seemed to be a constant iteration of things that already happened / any awake viewer already understood. If you'd cut all the gratuitous scenes you might end up with a 45 min episode for Tales from the Crypt (they do have higher production standards, tough) but you wouldn't be half as bored as watching the movie as it is.The other major downer was that fact that there was no acceptable explanation for the things that happened (there was some kind of explanation, but it didn't make any sense whatsoever and left many points out).In the state the movie is I can't really recommend watching it.

lovgren1 This was one of the worst movies i have ever seen. To even call this a horror move is totally wrong, it isn't scary at all,It brings nothing new to the table. A complete waste off time. Im against fast-forwarding movies but in this case its necessary. And i read somewhere that this would not be a low budget movie .Bah! The acting is really bad.So a big warning. Don't watch this.There are so much better horror-movies out there,in the genre that they are trying to be part of. For instance Ringu,A tale of two sisters,1408 and the saw movies.Uwe Boll could have made this movie.... Enough said

la-nive I saw 'Nailed' at the Westwood Film Festival last month and was blown away! It is a MUST SEE! From beginning to end, 'Nailed' keeps you engaged and guessing. This is not your typical horror flick...it doesn't bombard you with a lot of superfluous blood and guts, but it's so creepy, that I watched a few scenes through my fingers. It was apparent to me that this film was a labor of love; the writing was believable and the acting superb! Sam Sarpong gives a stand out performance as Scott Scott, he's subtle--you won't catch him acting in this film. The cinematography is excellent, with surprising angles and a certain grittiness that compliments the story. I give 'Nailed' two thumbs up!