The_Rascal_Multitude When you go into a film like "Motor Home Massacre", you expect to see either: 1) A surprisingly well crafted film that actually delivers some genuine suspense, even if it is low budget. (Extremely unlikely.) or 2) A movie that makes you burst out in peals of laughter at the sheer ridiculousness of it all.What we have here is a case of the second option. Basically, the story concerns a group of kids who are portrayed in the crudest possible stereotypes that you'd expect in a "dead teenager" film. They go camping, and have a fateful encounter with a machete wielding maniac.That's it, pretty much. The villain doesn't even use a chainsaw for the killings, which was odd, being that there's a bloody chainsaw on the cover of the DVD. One of those little things that makes you go "Hmmm..." The direction, atmosphere, and acting in this film ranks somewhere in between a softcore porn film you'd see on Cinemax at two in the morning, and a film class project made by high school students.That's not to say that there wasn't anything about "Motor Home Massacre" that I didn't enjoy. One memorable part involving a gas station cashier and the soon-to-be machete meat had me in stitches. "What kind of troubles?" "DEAD PEOPLE TROUBLES." Whoever wrote the script for this film was a mad genius.

redneckdan76 i had high expectations for the movie than what i saw, bad acting, stupid ending, too much sex scenes...if ya want porn rent porn, but i wanted a horror thats why i rented this.also im sick of movies having the redneck character be stupid, filthy, perverted, mean, drunkard etc. im a redneck and i ain't like the ones they portray in movies. towards the end when the killer is hacking at people, it just don't seem real, you can tell the hacking is fake, and then the dude that has his arm cut off and just lays there like its funny? then the killer gets knocked in the head with a heavy frying pan and still stands like it was nothing. tho i did like seeing a bunch of cocky young people get killed, thats always a plus. but yeah with a name like motorhome massacre, yad expect a better movie, the way they're doing remakes, maybe lionsgate can redeem themselves and remake this one. im cool with movies having unknown actors. but god, get some decent ones. the music in the movie was cool tho, so thats good . the sex scenes made me mad cause i don't care for them, but also thats time they could of been spent on showing people get killed and mutilated. all and all tho i liked it, if ya ain't picky about low budget movies then ya oughta see this one.

reeves2002 I wasted my money on renting this horrible movie and wasn't even able to get a refund or exchange.The only reason i rented it was because of the interesting cover art.It also sounded interesting by the movie description so i wanted to see it.I thought it would be similar to something like Friday the 13th since they were going out deep in the woods and were being stalked by a maniac.I watched a bit of this movie and then skipped from scene to scene hating it even more.I finally turned it off and watched something else which wasn't the greatest movie either but at least watchable. This film must have been either a student film or a very very bad B movie.I don't even know how it ended up in this DVD rental shop. The acting was worse then porn star acting.There was no plot and it looked like a rough cut of some movie made by a total amateur. I love horror movies and am open minded but this was absolute garbage!

davitalvitch I expected nothing from this film other than a way to help me recover from my three-day 35th birthday celebrating, a day I spent watching films in bed. I expected even less from it once that horrible "I'm a trucker" main titles song was played. The Roger character was the worst of the bunch for he was so over-the-top obnoxious and revolting that he'd not be anyone's polar-opposite friend at their age. Therefore, the very set up that these "types" (wigger, sexist pig, dweeb) would be still be friends as adults is ridiculous.You have to understand that this is actually a comedy, which became evident once the dweeb fantasizes that when the girl in bed slowly, teasingly lowers the bed sheet, she reveals not her breasts but a report card featuring two A+'s.However, it's a very trying film to sit through. I think I stopped it at one point to check e-mail. Even for low-budget, there are scenes which are just so stupid they're not even bad-enjoyable. Case in point: the convenience store scene. This seemed written by two 14-year-olds. Dreadful. And note how the owner tells them how there was a murder "last night" and concludes his tale by stating that "they never found out who did it." Ah, speed investigations...In fact, I'd be surprised if the script HADn't been written by various persons for there seemed to be different styles of writing. In contrast, a tied-up-in-bed scene produces an amusing conversation during the fishing-out of a pocket knife from the male's pants.Justin Geer, who played the dweeb, was fun to watch, for he actually can act. Tanya Fraser, the black girl whom is twice befriended, was good, and game even when being referred to as "tar baby." She has a very funny scene later in the film involving one of the blondes and a frying pan.The film gets better, in its bad-self way, as it nears its conclusion for it becomes simply ludicrous and over-the-top. (If one wishes to be let in to the RV before it drives away, perhaps going to the FRONT of the RV where, you know, the WINDSHIELD is, is better than pounding on the back of it.) It's played as a joke by the remaining cast, and if you're drinking and/or toking with friends, you'll chuckle. This is simply a film one cannot take seriously as horror or as a full-on comedy, but I find myself liking it, in a limited way. I'd watch it again with friends on "Bad Movie Night," but skip past certain scenes.