anakinahsokageek18 Watching this, I thought I was going to hate it, for I hated the one called "In Plane Site," but boy was I wrong. At first I was like, "Okay, what do these wars have to do with 9/11?" And when I received my answers, my jaw dropped to the ground. But I don't believe everything this documentary said, but it certainly gave me a whole different view on this horrible day. And to learn that we will never know the full truth since all the debris from the building was removed really insulted me, for we will never ever know the full truth thanks to the evidence being removed. Although I never had any connection to 9/11, I feel as if I do. And along with the families of the victims, I too would have protested in removing the crash site. Thanks to that, we'll never know the full truth! But this is worth watching.

dorkchop56 Well we obviously have a graduate from the Micheal Moore School of Documentaries here. This is the biggest piece of crap I have watched that wasn't his. I would say this is full of lie after lie but that wouldn't be true...they sprinkle in some half truths and a lot of "Huh? what's that got to do with anything?" You can't really blame them though, as when your premise is so absurd it doesn't leave you a lot to work with. They even go to the steel doesn't melt absurdity(how is it made then you genius). Two pictures of "the same area", but having completely different landmarks. Lies of when Bush was told about the towers falling, omissions of important facts like the short times the flights were in the air(by design), explosions from the "bottom of the buildings" while they show video of the buildings falling from the top(take a physics class moron), an "interview" with someone from the Department of Agriculture that supposedly had an odd conversation with one of the hijackers that was never reported(and no video of her saying any of it), and a general naiveté of life in general. They quote few to none of their "sources", except the left wing nut jobs that have the same no proof that they have. This is a slap in the face to anyone with common sense, the people that died on that horrible day, their families, and to be honest the United States of America. They should be ashamed of themselves, and should not claim to be Americans. This work of fiction could be considered a comedy, as most of it is so laughable, if it weren't for the screaming you will do at the TV for being insulted, and the huge crap they take on America and the families affected. A don't mind a dissenting view in a documentary or otherwise, but it should be at least close to fact based. This lacks anything that could be considered fact, and leaves you scratching your head wondering if anyone is dumb enough to believe any of this to the point of putting this mindless drivel on film and releasing it. Please, if you watch this, use your brain on the pathetic obvious things, and do research on the rest before you look as dumb as these film makers in public.

mikel weisser I've been a skeptic of the 9/11 myth since 9/11/2001, just based on what i saw and heard that day. When i began to learn others questioned the official story i was thrilled to learn more. Then in 2007, when Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe produced their first edition of this documentary i was overwhelmed and have shared the film in its various incarnations with well over a dozen screenings. It always has an impact. I see that other IMDb reviewers have labeled people who challenge the official version of 9/11 as the "tin foil hat brigade," but considering the number of times our government has straight up lied to us and then been caught, i was say the tin foil club are the people who blindly accept whatever swill our government puts out. As Jesse Ventura recently vented on "The View, "My government killed 58,000 of my generation in Vietnam on a lie, what makes you think they wouldn't sacrifice 3,000 to get what they want?" Over the past several years, initial small-timers now transformed into internationally acclaimed activists, Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe have challenged the official story of 9/11 with a series of spectacular documentaries, not just re-edits, but whole new films, continuously evolving their presentation as newer evidence comes in. In a scientific approach, they have formed hypotheses, presented them, and then rejected and replaced them in favor of other approaches as different info comes to light. The several different installments of "Loose Change" have continuously refined the message,tossing aside the more sensational claims made in earlier incarnations and now Avery and Rowe have formed a pretty solid indictment by the time they finished "Loose Change: An American Coup." The problem for me, was i liked the sensational stuff of the earlier versions better. And the breathless narration and the driving music. Once upon a time "Loose Change" was a sensational knockout that felt as subversive as its subject matter, now it's a very good, very serious film. The dilemma for us as audience is that veracity has come at a price of entertainment value, not by much but enough to where it is worth noting if the viewer hasn't seen any other versions. The second edition i felt was the strongest version,though it turns out some of their original assertions didn't hold up. But the pacing and the music of the earlier versions of this film series were so much more entertaining, it is sometimes hard for me to remember the newer editions are "improvements." This most recent edition is also more polished, done with a bigger staff, more elaborate in establishing its veracity and more historically grounded, just not as pulse-pounding. Don't misunderstand though, this series is one of the most important docs ever to circulate and one of the biggest causes in American history and this edition has the best set of facts presented in the most rigorously evaluated way. Show this version to anyone who hasn't seen any versions since its version of the truth is the most probable.All that said, after you've seen their "truest" vision, go back to earlier editions for the more exciting film making. Maybe Avery and Rowe still haven't found all the answers, but they make a solid effort with a series of progressively more professional quality films. I don't know if they'll ever get to the bottom of the mysteries around 9/11, but they've certainly learned how to be movie makes par excellence while on the quest.

michael_madsen I've seen all the versions of the "Loose Change 9/11" and this is absolutely the best one. It has the most facts, since more facts have been discovered since the first edition was released. The first edition of "Loose Change 9/11" was actually what made me interested about 9/11 and made me dig into other literature about it. I've seen dozens of videos and read a lot of different articles/debates about it and there is (of course) a lot of speculation and guessing involved. However some facts remain: - Scientists have discovered nano-thermite in the dust from the worldtrade collapses. - 3 highrise, steel-reinforced skyscrapers collapsed into their own footprint at near-freefall speed.This should be more than enough to argue for a real (truthful) investigation, since these facts can not be explained by the pancake theory.Then on top of these facts, there are tons of other issues that are just insane coincidences, eyewitneses and other questions that are not answered by the official explanation.And remember, you can't argue against the facts with questions like: "Yes, but thousands of people should have been involved and so many people can't keep a secret", since this is also just speculation.