dierregi Contrary to what written by some reviewers, knowledge of football is required to fully enjoy this movie. I have none, nor do I care about football. I even had no idea who Eric Cantona was. Even if it was easy to understand that he is a French ex-footballer who played for some English team, it was not so to understand what sort of person he is and why he was so popular.Besides, the main twist in the plot revolves around football supporters (the infamous British hooligans). Therefore, there is a lot of football, and not being interested in it is definitely detrimental to the enjoyment of the movie.The main character, Eric the postman, is a weak, insignificant man who dumped his first wife Lily, after they had a baby and then squandered his life, ending up with a depression and two no-good stepsons from the second wife. In an attempt to drag him out of this slump, his co-workers and friends football supporters invite him to follow a role model.The fact that Eric chooses a footballer as role model is already saying a lot about his standards. Suddenly Mr. Cantona starts appearing to Eric to guide him through the difficulties of his life. It is very difficult to understand how Mr. Cantona does so, because he speaks with a very thick accent that makes his speeches barely understandable. Also, the content of his advice seems quite trivial.However, thanks to this support, Eric manages to patch it up with Lily. Amazingly, she seems interested in getting back with the man who dumped her with a new-born baby for no reason, except lack of responsibility. He also manages to straighten up the situation with the almost-criminal older stepson. This happens in the movie finale and it is by far the funniest and liveliest part of an otherwise very boring movie.For me it was 80% boredom, as I could not empathize at all with spineless Eric and thought it was just right that the second wife dumped him, leaving a hot potato to tackle, just as he did with Lily. The 20% enjoyment comes from the final part –really unexpected twist, but still underlying the fact that hooligans will be hooligans.

Chrysanthepop In 'Looking for Eric' Loach takes a look at the complicated life of a down on his luck unhappy postman, Eric Bishop. He desperately struggles to cope with his dysfunctional home, ignorant kids and a sad breakup but all seems hopeless until he finds a way in the form of former football player Eric Cantona. Loach does a wonderful job by infusing humour, philosophy and football into the story.The presentation itself is very raw and suitably toned down. The sets and setting look authentic. The actors look like the common people one would see in bars. The intense scenes are very effective as the stark portrayal of Eric's struggle and despair is raw to the core. The humour comes as a welcome comic relief as it balances well. I really enjoyed the sequences with the two Erics. This is where Eric Bishop finds solace, peace and answers and his friendship with his imaginary friend is easy to relate to.Another theme that Loach beautifully presents in 'Looking for Eric' is the importance and love for football. Why fans excitedly watch a match and cheer or yell at the team they support, what football means to them, and the significant effect it has on the lives of fans are all wonderfully explored here.Steve Evets is great as Eric Bishop. His nuanced portrayal stands out beautifully. Eric Cantona perhaps delivers one of the most sincere performances I have ever seen from a sports player turned actor. Even though some may argue that he's just playing himself, I'd say that he's playing Eric Cantona from Eric Bishop's point of view, not his own. I also liked how Stephanie Bishop downplays Lily. The rest of the actors do a brilliant job.Ken Loach's little film is a winner all the way.

Lee Eisenberg The recent World Cup in South Africa brought everyone's attention to soccer (which most of the world calls football), but movies such as "Bend It Like Beckham" and "Looking for Eric" show why we should pay more attention to it. The Fall's Steve Evets plays down-on-his-luck postman Eric Bishop, who in his mind gets advice from footballer Eric Cantona (playing himself). Through this, Eric reconnects with his family. But when his son gets involved with a group of thugs, Eric has to take charge.This is only the third Ken Loach film that I've seen (the others were "Poor Cow" and "Kes"). As I understand it, Loach usually focuses on political topics in his movies. While this one isn't really political, it's still one that I strongly recommend. Everything about it feels so realistic. I'd never even heard of Eric Cantona before this. Without a doubt, the best scene in the movie is the home invasion towards the end.

bob the moo Postman Eric is pretty much at the end of his tether. His partner has not come back home despite her being released from prison over two months ago, leaving him looking after two teenage stepsons, neither of whom respect him or listen to him and appear to be heading down the wrong road in life. His own daughter Sam needs help with her own daughter and asks Eric to get in touch with her mother Lily, who Eric left as a young single mother. The pressures from all sides are clear to even his colleagues, who to their credit do attempt to help him. Rather than talk to himself, Eric confides in a poster of his idol, Eric Cantona only to find that the man himself appears in his room. With sage input from Cantona, Eric attempts to put his life in order while the external forces threaten to tear it apart.A strange film from Ken Loach this and one that doesn't ever really work as well as certain parts of it do or as well as the idea makes it sound like it should. As a film it is rather fragmented both in terms of tone and narrative and it is shame that the two could not have been brought together in a more effective manner. The first half of the film spends its time mostly focused very much on the mental state of Eric and, although some have said this part is dull I actually found it to be pretty engaging and clever. The importance of sport in the world of men (particularly working class men – sorry if that sounds snobby) should not be overlooked and I thought that the film had potential by using Cantona as a sounding board for Eric to work out his problems in a way that is made easier by virtue of his idol taking him mentally into that world where it is OK to let it all out, OK to cry, OK to be oneself – the world of the terraces as he describes them. This doesn't really happen though although it is close enough to that to keep it interesting and the passion of the football discussions does add a nice contrast to the reality of Eric's life.In the second half of the film a discovery starts a specific dramatic thread and it makes for a sudden change in the tone of the film – one that is most noticeable because the script becomes the F word for long sections. This rather gritty and violent dose of reality clashes with the fantasy of the first half and, while they are still linked I didn't think that they were linked well enough in terms of the tone and feel of the film. It is a shame because the second half does work and it does lead to a rather uplifting conclusion but even this doesn't quite fit into the thread that it concludes. I'm not describing it very well but the overall impression I'm trying to land is that the film has plenty of good ideas and isn't "bad" so much as it just has a lot of potential that goes unrealised.Cantona may be the name that draws the eye but Evets does very well in the lead role. He makes a very convincing character with all of his performance and if the material had been there with him, his performance would have been a big part of the film being consistent – as it is he cannot do it alone. Cantona is an enigmatic presence and, although hard to understand sometimes, this is what he brings to the film and he works very well with Evets as the solid, thoughtful sounding board of reason – again the material just doesn't seem to let their scenes have the meaning and impact that they could have done. The supporting cast are understandably outside of the main scenes but there are still good performances from Bishop, Kearns, Gumbs, Hudson as well as older hands like Henshaw and a few others.Overall Looking for Eric is an engaging but frustrating experience. It is engaging because of the potential inherent in the ideas and the narrative, however it is also frustrating because not all that potential is realised and the delivery seems disjointed and rather uneven in terms of tone and substance. Interesting enough and good enough to take a look but it is not the film it deserved to be and is not one of Loach's or Laverty's better films.