Little Fockers

2010 "Kids bring everyone closer, right?"
5.5| 1h38m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 21 December 2010 Released
Producted By: Paramount Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

It has taken 10 years, two little Fockers with wife Pam and countless hurdles for Greg to finally get in with his tightly wound father-in-law, Jack. After the cash-strapped dad takes a job moonlighting for a drug company, Jack's suspicions about his favorite male nurse come roaring back. When Greg and Pam's entire clan descends for the twins' birthday party, Greg must prove to the skeptical Jack that he's fully capable as the man of the house.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Paramount Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

JoeKarlosi The third, probably the last, and definitely the least of the "Focker" trilogy. All the principles return, only this time there's no real idea what to do for a story and thus this thing veers all over the place. Despite its title, the script is not really about the offspring of Ben Stiller's loins, either. Robert De Niro's character has a heart attack, and so he begins to think about having Gaylord Focker (Ben Stiller) as his successor. Trouble brews when dad has yet another contrived reason to mistrust his suspicious son-in-law. Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand make very limited appearances as Gaylord's parents. It's not without a very rare chuckle on occasion, but it's a hit and miss-miss sequel that is easily skipped. ** out of ****
Baleegh Shaw The movie "Little Fockers" was the third installment in the series of the Fockers family series and it has lot of number of flaws like what was the role of Ms. Jessica Alba in the movie; who knowing well that Mr. Gaylord Focker was a married man jumps into the movie and started hugging him, and making snaps with him while kissing on his cheek and further pasting the same on her web page was totally out of the line. She doesn't stop here rather she dropped him off to his under constructed house and showed up again with bottle of wine and Viagra sort of tablets and eating them and then starts undressing herself and throwing herself onto Mr. Gaylord Focker and creating a scene was totally out of proportion. She is not that hot, that she thought of herself and just removing clothes for nothing I guess. The same goes for Mr. Owen Wilson who was the ex-fiancé of the Ms. Pam keeps on jumping around in all the three movies without a sufficient reason, he was once rejected by Pam's father so why he was showing again and again was a confusion at least I failed to understand. In the third movie he made to tattoo of Pam on his lower back and he is giving decisions and helping the family with zero intention. It was forcefully funny with good acting of Mr. Gaylord Focker, and I will rate this movie 5 out of 10.
SnoopyStyle Greg Focker (Ben Stiller) is more successful, and drug rep Andi Garcia (Jessica Alba) is proving to be a beautiful temptation. Jack (Robert De Niro) is distressed after Dr Bob left Debra and he has a heart attack. Jack decides to anoint Greg as the Godfocker. However, the return of Kevin (Owen Wilson) and the beautiful Andi leads to misunderstandings, doubts, and conflict.This movie suffers from a lack of funny gags. The cat is barely here. The kids don't add much comedy. Jessica Alba is hot, but her character should be a lot more funnier. The movie needs it. The only saving grace is the family relationships. And in this one, I like Greg a lot more. It's like a get together with old friends but the new material isn't working. There is only so much that De Niro can do with his stink eyes.I also don't understand the title. I assumed this was more about the kids. Instead the kids add little more. The better title would be 'The Godfocker'.
alex-caruso1 Just like everyone else has pointed out, the 3rd Fockers movie just sucked plain and simple. I just watched it at a friend's house the other night, and all I noticed myself NOT doing was laughing. Whenever a humorous part was about to happen, not only was it not funny, but it was so predictable, and you knew what was going to happen. You could tell for sure that the movie was trying hard to be funny, but when you know a movie tries hard to be funny, you know it's going to fail and that you won't get a single laugh out of it. I've seen the first one, but haven't seen all of the second one. All I know is that I got laughs out of the other two, but surely not this one. What a let down, and how humiliating that Robert De Niro gets a shot to the penis. Like that's how HARD they were trying to get you to laugh. But all I did was cringe when De Niro got stabbed in the dick with a needle.