prguy721 Last Summer is a shockingly bold film for its time period (late 1960s) and very well acted, featuring actors who went on to virtual stardom at a time when they were just starting out: Barbara Hershey, Richard Thomas and Bruce Davison. Portraying restless teenagers at Fire Island for the summer, they meet and begin hanging out together, eventually encountering Rhoda (Catherine Burns), a teenager who doesn't quite fit their mold but wants to make friends. And this is where the story really gets moving. As the plot advances, it seems the behavior of the original three becomes increasingly edgy and even cruel. Meanwhile, Rhoda, with her sincerity and vulnerability, senses she is out of place but desperately hangs in to be part of the group, even though she sets herself up for embarrassment, conflict and possibly even danger. Unfortunately, copies of Last Summer are pretty much impossible to find and it is almost never shown on television. I saw it when it was originally released, but the only time I saw it on cable TV was in 2013; to my great disappointment, the print wasn't in letterbox and had been edited for content, reducing both the film's impact and significance.

hkfilmbuff I read this haunting tale by Evan Hunter in the late 1960's, and felt numb afterwards. It was a devastating story, but came across honest and true. I wasn't aware that it had been made into a movie until much later, but never felt compelled to "revisit" it, until it turned up on TV (TCM, I think) recently. The movie did capture the essence of the novel, unsupervised (neglected) adolescents from well-off, dysfunctional (hinted), families spiraled out of control when their ambiguous and budding desires fed off each other in a vicious circle, culminating in something akin to evil. The psychological and sociological overtones reflected the zeitgeist of the sixties - sex, drugs, violence, and the mob mentality.The sexually suggestive scenes and the violence was tastefully done, necessary but not exploitative. This film was definitely targeting a more mature audience, but surely will not unduly shock or traumatize the precocious youths of today. Nevertheless, portions of the story are unpleasant enough to discourage repeated viewing. In any case, the message is potent enough to come across loud and clear just going through it once.For the more inquisitive viewers who might wonder whether the worst had happened to Rhoda, I suggest a reading of the excellent book by Evan Hunter. ("The Blackboard Jungle" and "Mr. Buddwing" are among the films based on his books. In fact, he wrote a sequel to "Last Summer", aptly named "Come Winter". He was also well-known in another genre under the name Ed McBain.) In retrospect, I wish I had not read the novel before I saw the movie. I always prefer watching the movie before reading the book (if there is one). In my opinion, the medium lends itself to greater dramatic and emotional impact, and provides a more primal sensory experience, but there are invariably certain elements in a book that no motion picture can convey.I suspect my rating for this film would have been higher had it not been for the unpleasant and unresolved emotions and thoughts it provoked, but did (could) not provide any hope or closure in the ending.

dougdoepke There's no plot, no apparent theme, and little action. And an hour into the movie, I'm still not sure where it's going. So why is the 90-minutes as riveting as I think it is. For one, the filmmakers begin with that interesting seagull sequence that provides insight into Sandy's (Hershey) manipulative character and the boys' general submissiveness. However, in between the opening sequence and the final one, nothing much happens. Some scenes are overlong (the pot smoking, the hair washing), while the elliptical dialog is often punctuated by long, non- meaningful, pauses.Nonetheless, the three hedonistic kids are attractive, fairly realistic, and found horsing around at a scenic beach. But then, chubby Rhoda arrives, with her needy, yet judgmental, attitude, and it's curious where things will go from there now that an outsider is watching them.There's an undercurrent here, especially with Sandy, that's seductive. It's to the filmmakers credit, including the cast, that they manage to mesmerize with such spare elements. Oddly, the technique reminds me of the popular Swedish auteur Ingmar Bergman— especially his Virgin Spring (1959).I take the upshot as having to do with judgmental people who stand apart from the crowd and not being able to tolerate them. But however you take it, the movie avoids cliché (as others note) and continues to fascinate at a generally unspoken level. Too bad the Perry's didn't make more movies.

ronh1123 I hadn't seen this film in years. I did rent the VHS version. I thought it was really good. And wonder why they don't make films like this anymore. Most films today about teens are very silly or horror films. I don't even remember a recent serious drama about teenagers. The point of the ending (the rape scene)is very simple. All the sexual tension that Dan and Peter have towards Sandy is redirected by Sandy towards Rhoda. Sandy is extremely manipulative throughout the film. When the three kids leave, Peter stands on the dune and waits. Obviously he has second thought and wonders-What did I do! One of the best teen films ever made!! I did see the unedited version of this film, although obviously it was panned and scanned as a TV print.