cmovies-99674 PROS: To start off, the acting in what should've been a poor film, was in reality very well crafted. Each character was injected into the plot with so much finesse that you couldn't help but feel what they felt. The actors took on some deep, deep circumstances and they pulled them off phenomenally. All the scenes in the movie were so separate while staying just as significant to the central point. The idea of mini stories coming together to create one big one was creative and like no other. This made for an unconventional build up of tension, but it wan't bad. I liked the mini climaxes, and the character development that this set up created. But overall, I enjoyed the creative style of the progression of intensity and the acting which helped carry this dark film.CONS: A simple thing that one could point out was then ending. I enjoyed the climax getting us to the resolution, I just didn't like the resolution itself. The reason for me not liking it was probably because it didn't enhance the movie for me. The requirements for a "technically" good ending is to clarify questions that help inform the watcher while simultaneously not taking away from the watchers overall viewing experience, to leave a lasting impression, and to enhance a point at which the film was trying to drive home; that can be anything from self preservation, blood must have blood, or even horror is fun. But this movie just missed the mark on a few key elements of a good hardy resolution.www.chorror.com

sestrom Sure, some movies can portray violence in a tasteful way. It can be used to show a variety of things, raw human emotion being one of them. I'm no enemy to violence in movies, but this was one of the most disturbing things I have ever seen. There is an extremely graphic rape scene, and a good portion of the movie is just sexual violence. But still, the movie could have perhaps redeemed itself had Chris simply got his revenge on Ilya. But he didn't. Instead, he terrorized Ilya's underage daughter (in the same sexual manner Ilya terrorized Alicia), eventually killing her. Other things to note: the setup was terrible, the Tarantino quote from Jackie Brown was awkwardly slipped in within the first five minutes. I can understand what Levan Bakhia was going for, but it was just an absolutely disgusting attempt at a Tarantino copycat and I think it could've been much more original. And nobody wants to see graphic rape scenes, just for the record.

Pob 75 There is something very wrong with the rating for this (currently over 6/10). The only reason I'm giving this 2/10 is that it is slightly better than some truly unwatchable films I have given 1/10. If I could give this 1.1/10 I would.The story is wafer thin, contrived and poorly written. None of the characters feel real or engaging. The dialogue, performances and plot are annoying.There are some pretty bad films that I enjoy or find something in that I like, but I can find nothing of merit here. I cannot believe the reviews singing its praises are genuine and unbiased.

sanienjao !!!Spoiler alert!!!TBH I was bored and just found some random movie to watch. I had zero idea what I was about to watch. The movies is indeed very well made and it captured the helplessness very well. If I had known it was this disturbing I wouldn't have watched it. Because of one crazy fat guy 2 innocent girls dies and all their lives are destroyed. I have no idea who the director is but he has done a very good job making a movie out of 2 scenes really, a small camp at the mountain side and the house. I never felt that this was a budget film at all, something that you often do with low budget movies. The actors are great. I really felt their despair and I hate the fat guy and wish through the hole movies that I could be the one to put a bullet in his head! That being said all the credit of course goes to the actor. He did a fine job playing a***** :-DDisturbing most disturbing.