Killing Lincoln

2013
Killing Lincoln
6.7| 1h29m| PG| en| More Info
Released: 16 February 2013 Released
Producted By: National Geographic
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/killing-lincoln/
Synopsis

April 14, 1865. One gunshot. One assassin hell-bent on killing a tyrant, as he charged the 16th President of the United States. And in one moment, our nation was forever changed. This is the most dramatic and resonant crime in American history—the true story of the killing of Abraham Lincoln.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

National Geographic

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Mr Black Well, I picked this up on blueray at a local story without knowing anything about it. Unfortunately, it is not what I expected. This is not a theatrical movie. IT's more like a documentary from the history channel or something. It was okay if you like watching TV but don't expect a movie. Historically it is very accurate but I did have some problems with this. For starters,, "from this point Lincoln has 12 days to live." Wow,, seriously? They kept counting this down. Very TV like. Secondly, why does everyone portray Lincoln as the slowest moving man in history? He wasn't that old. I'm pretty sure a guy his age could walk faster than a snail moving through molasses, but every actor seems to think Lincoln moved and walked like a 105 year old man! Finally,, and this is the one that really bugs me. Several times now, including in this movie,, actors doing narration refer to a horse mounted unit as THE CALVARY.. That is wrong. Calvary was the hill where Jesus was crucified. The word is CAVALRY - a horse mounted unit.. the V comes before the L. Does no one in Hollywood or the US. realize this? Why doesn't a script supervisor, set historian, or someone else say,, "Excuse me,, you're pronouncing that word wrong. It just cheapens the whole production.
gabriellkolmercc16 I think that this is a good movie. As for myself not being a huge documentary fan, that aspect of he film wasn't so much to my liking. I wish it had been more of a movie with a plot and storyline, without all of the narrating. However for the purpose that I was to watch it (a history class assignment) I learned a lot through it, and despite my negative feelings toward he narration, Tom Hanks does a wonderful job setting the viewer up and giving them a sufficient amount of background knowledge to be able to understand the happenings of the movie. Also at some points throughout the movie, the way that certain scenes were filmed seemed a bit shaken almost, unprofessional-like. Now whether that was done on purpose or not, I was not very pleased with that. I did like the way that before a new event began in the movie, or a new scene, the time, place and date were shown. Again providing the viewer with background information so they don't get too lost in following the story. As for the story itself, the story of the assassination of President Lincoln, in my opinion, was told very well through this movie. I liked the way that it seemed to take an objective approach and just told the story how it happened, without seeming to really advocate for either side more than the other. It was very informative and I thought that the casting was done well too. John Wilkes Booth's character especially fit, I think, because he just seems creepy the whole way through the movie, with his mustache and the journal entries he writes of his self justification for the terrible thing he has done. All in all I think that this movie was a good movie, and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to know more about the story of Lincoln's assassination or who particularly enjoy historical documentaries.
evening1 Just like the forces of al Qaida 150 years later, John Wilkes Booth had visions of decapitating the United States government.This made-for-TV adaptation of Bill O'Reilly's bestseller is an interesting account of the multi-pronged plot against Lincoln, his secretary of state, and his vice president one epochal night in 1865.Though no dead-ringer for the 16th president, Billy Campbell does a creditable job of portraying an ever-humble leader who seemed to genuinely care for the common man. "You are a free citizen; kneel to no one but God," Lincoln advises a freed slave.Jesse Johnson (son of Patti D'Arbanville of Cat Stevens fame) is believable as Booth, whose histrionics bordered on megalomania ("I stand with Brutus!").As in any drama about the assassination, this one might prompt you to wonder whether Lincoln had a death wish. Sure, he spoke of fearing rumors more than snipers, but riding alone at night through an isolated farm field when you are the most hated man in the South does seem a bit suicidal. Similarly, he was a true sitting duck at Ford's Theater. (And why was it initially a mystery who had fired the shot? I thought Booth was one of the most famous actors in America!)This drama mentions a number of interesting side players traceable on Wikipedia. Consider reading about Sgt. Boston Corbett, the military man who shot and killed Booth against orders. Now there's an intriguing bio!
richardcuccia If you watch this movie, you will know the facts of the events leading to, the events of, and the results of Abraham Lincoln's assassination. This is most excellently performed.The actors who portrayed both Lincoln (Billy Campbell) & Booth (Jesse Johnson) performed A plus roles. Both actors conveyed the feel of the age and the personality of both historical persons as history has made them known to us. Excellent. Johnson for sure deserves an award. Watching his performance, you will feel that you know Booth.If you are at all interesting in these events, watch this movie. You will be well educated, informed, and entertained. In this modern day, such a combination is rare, indeed.In the highest minded rationale, this is as good an expression of the TV art as there can be.