daniel-mannouch Having seen near enough every micro budget Brit crime film going within the past twenty years, i found Killer Bitch (or Killer Babe for its original title) to be the most entertaining, bar none. Most of them were insincere. faux-Hollywood Shi'ite in my honest opinion and Killer Bitch threw me back with its rawness and don't give a damn attitude. It made me believe again that there was still fun to be had in the commercial British film. I sincerely wish more British filmmakers would take inspiration and stop waiting around for a seven figure budget and get off their seats and just make something or tell a story for the pure love of it. Liam Galvin's unpretentious exploitation debut has is faults, definitely. There is no getting around facts such as the story being just a straight jacket to hold the insanity in, that no one starring is a 'professional' actor, impoverished production values and that is was shot on cheap camera equipment. But anyone familiar with the film industry will understand that more money means less freedom. This is because it is run by gentrified carnies, fear of every medium not film, and fallible means of measuring revenue and audience approval. Compare Killer Bitch to something like The Hooligan Wars, a lesser known film by the White Collar Hooligan guys. Better camera equipment, actors, yet boring as all hell. This was because it had to stay within genre, within a formula, to secure the amount of revenue desired by the filmmakers. I wouldn't put it pass the guys at Press on Features that their output exists more to fatten the portfolio of those involved than to be anything considered entertainment. Killer Bitch has none of these problems. It is a film that was manufactured to be an after pub crawl screening. Other efforts attributed to this kind of lad audience have more on their mind, attempting to have a message or ponder or some other don't care at all, then balls it up because they get split personality disorder and can't decide whether to be genre or drama, and there IS a difference people. Killer Bitch is straight genre. Exploitation. Unlike such hipster wastes of space like Zombie Hunter or Hell Ride, this film is the real deal. Genuinely offensive and somewhat misguided in places, however also intentionally funny in others and cut together with a machine gun pace, there is no reason other than prudishness that can explain why someone would be 'bored' by this film or find it a waste of people's time. It does the job it was conceived to do; coo the inebriated. Killer Bitch is not a film for everyone. But it is film that knows what it is and displays so much personality, on and off screen that it stands out as an oasis in an otherwise dry and baron wasteland of write off tax revenue tarted up as film productions. Blame that war criminal (you know the one) for the craptitude of the UK film industry as well as the shysters that operate within it; not blue moon bursts of eccentricity such as this film. Absurd, hilarious, outrageous, explicit and inept, both intentionally and un, if such productions like Killer Bitch are the future of British independent commercial film, i, for one, will not be complaining.

BadgerBoy4444 Not only is this the worst film I have EVER seen, It is quite possibly the worst film ever MADE! Even referring to this garbage as a "Film" is an overstatement. It seems as if the actors were plucked from an idiot convention, dragged onto the set, given their lines for the first time, and simply read them out in front of the camera and "Yeah brilliant take guys! we nailed it!" The ONLY plus point for me with this film was the fact that Alex Reid was hardly in it! His acting was actually worse than all of the rest of the cast (seriously... THAT bad...).The hardest part to believe about this film for me was that the director must of watched it back at some point, and actually WANTED to put his name on it. The "guns" used were atrocious, I used to own a more realistic cap gun when I was a child, they didn't even overlay the noise of a real gun you literally just hear a slight "pop" and then the guy being shot slowly lays on the floor.Now, I have nothing against low budget films, but if you MUST have shootings in your low budget film, at least use camera cuts so that you don't see the gun making no damage to the victim, in one of the scenes in a boxing ring, a guy is laying on the mat and is shot at point blank range in the stomach, NOTHING happens to him, no body jolts, no blood, just nothing, I mean come on, talk about bad movie making.I could rant about this feeble excuse of a film for hours, but the truth is, no matter what you read in this review, or no matter what people tell you about this film, it is far far worse than you could even imagine, I would recommend watching it JUST to see how impossibly bad it really is.This film actually made me angry, angry that this piece of crap actually had any budget at all, angry that it even got the 'go ahead', angry about the whole-new levels of cardboard acting, I honestly think you could not make a film as bad as this if you tried! Now to try and erase the memory of this despicable film from my brain...

trashgang Someone in the UK mentioned this flick to me to see it. I did and I was surprised what I just saw. Not coming from the UK I don't know all the actors, sigh, that are in this turkey. A bit of research told me that the most of them are in the boxing scene. Whatever, the back ground is not important. If you are making a flick then you must know what you are doing. I guess the reason why it was released was the fact that Alex Reid, winner of the final series of the UK's "Celebrity Big Brother" was in it. And of course the use of almost pornographic material. Yes, you will see an old man with a belly running around with his dick naked. You will see a lot of fake breasts in extreme close up and the film starts with an almost pornographic scene. To make it shock, well, that part surely worked. There are also a lot of shootings, well, see them drop dead, I mean, fall. The worst acting is in it, the red stuff flows, there's a lot of bare fist fighting and boxing and of course a lot of dialects, so typical for British flicks. Nothing is explained, why she has to kill 5 persons, I just don't know. If you want to see fat bodies full of tattoos, some boxing promo and fake juggs, go ahead, otherwise avoid it.

David O'Brien This is like someone going around with a cine camera filming famous London lowlifes, porn stars and Z-list actors. The plot is non-existent. The "famous" rape scene is absolutely ridiculous. To rape someone, you have to have removed their underwear first! I wouldn't mind if the gore was realistic. It is actually laughable in the extreme. Don't insult your intelligence by sitting through this. Cass Pennant is not a professional actor and he gives the "best of a bad lot" performance of anyone in the film. I am assuming this film had a budget of around 50p. That's what it looks like to me. You'd do better yourself on YouTube !